Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

89 turbo, It's gotta go

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-13-2004, 11:35 AM
  #16  
tifosiman
Race Director
 
tifosiman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Heart of it All
Posts: 12,208
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Originally posted by 944S2NUT
Pardon me.
Old 07-13-2004, 11:38 AM
  #17  
944S2NUT
Drifting
 
944S2NUT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Canada
Posts: 3,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally posted by tifosiman
Pardon me.
Old 07-13-2004, 02:13 PM
  #18  
NeedPorscheSpeed
Three Wheelin'
 
NeedPorscheSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally posted by tifosiman
Respectfully, I must differ with that. Not all 89's are M030.
Wow, this is new information to me. In the 12 years of following and the 5 years of owning my 1989 Turbo, I have never heard of one not having the M030 package... I had always thought that all 1989 Turbos were built to the exact same specifications as the 1988 Turbo S, hence, the reason for the 1988 Turbo S buyer's rage when Porsche decided to not make the Turbo S a 700 car limited run after all... Or so I thought. Any 944 Turbo experts out there who can shed some light on this topic?
Old 07-13-2004, 02:27 PM
  #19  
Waterguy
Three Wheelin'
 
Waterguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 1,388
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Thats funny. The factory service manuals identify all the M030 components (928S4 front brakes, 26.8 mm front sway bar, 160lb springs/25.5 mm torsion bars, Koni height adjustables front/single adjustables rear) as being standard on MY 89 cars and optional on MY 90 and 91. Club Sports are also listed as the standard wheels in 89. The one difference is the reduction of the rear sway bar from 18 mm to 16 mm in mid-89, which was done for all cars (951 & 944S2) whether they had M030 or not. Because the equipment was standard, 030 may not have shown up in the option codes, although it does on my (US model) car.
Old 07-13-2004, 03:18 PM
  #20  
Cyrus951
Rennlist Member
 
Cyrus951's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: 951 -> 958 (SOCAL)
Posts: 3,726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Umm.. out of all 1,385 89 951's produced, they all came with M030.
Old 07-13-2004, 03:20 PM
  #21  
Epic2112
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Epic2112's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Silver Spring, MD
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Well, mine has M030 suspension and brakes. That's about all I can contribute to this conversation.
Old 07-13-2004, 03:54 PM
  #22  
tifosiman
Race Director
 
tifosiman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Heart of it All
Posts: 12,208
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Well, I just spent some considerable time this past weekend looking at and driving Wade's 89 951 and it does not have the 928S4 calipers, and the front struts appeared to be the normal 951 units. I can take photos the next time I am there.

As far as the 951S people getting hacked off back then, I think it was because they made more than 700 units in 1988, not 1989's cars that were not called specifically "TurboS".
Old 07-13-2004, 04:00 PM
  #23  
GOBOGIE
Budding Photographer
Rennlist Member
 
GOBOGIE's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: A Quiet Little Lake In The Middle of Nowhere
Posts: 7,007
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Does Wade know for sure that his car has not been modified? As in things haven't been changed since it was new? Hard to believe that someong would take stuff like that off, but I've seen wierder things!!!

Just a thought... as I don't know much about how long he's had it and previous owner and such.
Old 07-13-2004, 04:11 PM
  #24  
tifosiman
Race Director
 
tifosiman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Heart of it All
Posts: 12,208
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

Dunno. I know of another 89 as well that only has the smaller standard 951 front calipers (and thus no M030 spindles) here in town, it was at the TajMaGaraj show last year.

I could be mistaken about Wade's car, but that was one of the things that stuck out in my mind from that day. (I wasn't drinking anything other than water either, I promise, so no alchohol can be blamed) I guess I will need to email Wade to verify.

My "Excellence Was Expected" will arrive here tomorrow, gotta pull that out for reference on this as well.
Old 07-13-2004, 04:17 PM
  #25  
Friendan
Drifting
 
Friendan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Vancouver, BC, Canada
Posts: 2,310
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

I can also vouch for this car...I saw it before Lance bought it...what an absolutely gorgeous automobile, my dream car too...a black on black 89 Turbo, totally flawless!!!
Someone BUY THIS CAR!!!
Old 07-13-2004, 07:32 PM
  #26  
MachSchnell
Pro
 
MachSchnell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: Boca Raton, FL
Posts: 726
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Weren't there a few 'comfort' ordered cars that were M030 delete for MY89? I thought that had been an explanation put forward back some time ago for this phenomenon...am I mis-remembering?
Old 07-13-2004, 08:11 PM
  #27  
K27
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
K27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 1,153
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Could it also be they are built in 88 registered in 89 ?
Old 07-13-2004, 09:19 PM
  #28  
Bill
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: A suburb of Silicon Valley, CA
Posts: 2,099
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

hence, the reason for the 1988 Turbo S buyer's rage when Porsche decided to not make the Turbo S a 700 car limited run after all... Or so I thought.
Porsche originally planned to make 1,000 1988 Turbo S's. This amount grew to 1,635.

The 88 Turbo S does differ from the 89 in specific ways. All 88 TS's were intended to be painted the same metallic silver/pink color of Silver Rose. The interior was the custom design featuring a bright "Studio" pattern in shades of pink for the seat inlays and door panels, over a burgundy solid color. However some complained about the color scheme and so some 88's were made to the standard color chart as a special order. I have not seen any official counts on the non-silver rose 88 cars but there are very few. The Silver rose color scheme was not available on any other model year.

Also the stylised "Turbo" decal for the top of the right front fender was originated for the 88 TS.
Old 07-13-2004, 10:39 PM
  #29  
Dmitry S.
Rennlist Member
 
Dmitry S.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Menlo Park, CA
Posts: 1,703
Received 10 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Bill
I have not seen any official counts on the non-silver rose 88 cars but there are very few.
Isn't Efren's 88 an S model? It's red too.
Old 07-14-2004, 02:40 AM
  #30  
NeedPorscheSpeed
Three Wheelin'
 
NeedPorscheSpeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 1,336
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Regarding the confusion about the 1989 Turbo (S), I dug up this excellent information that I first read about 5 years ago on the St. Louis PCA website:

"The initial run of 339 1988 Turbo S cars were painted a special "Silver Rose" color with an ordinary plaid burgundy interior. They had no sunroof, air conditioning or power windows in order to save weight. Dealers sold those so fast the factory increased production to a total of 1000 cars, 716 of which ended up in the United States. However, the silver rose color was dropped and all standard Porsche colors and options were now available. Most of the later "S's" were loaded with air, leather seats, sunroof, premium sound and power windows."

"In 1989, all 944 Turbos came with this "S" package so that's why you don't see a 1989 944 Turbo "S". The only thing they dropped was the "S" designation!"

My guess is that Wade's car and any others that are without M030 that year must have had parts replaced that were not M030 spec. Wade's car, for example, has 250K miles, and I would imagine those original S4 calipers have had to be replaced. I imagine that when it came time to replace those calipers, a mechanic erroneously put regular '88 Turbo/'89-'91 brakes instead of the original S4 brakes. It could be that a previous owner wanted to save money, as well.

Also possible, although less likely, is that a few buyers wanted a softer ride and had the M030 option deleted. With Porsche's reputation for building cars any way the buyer wants, I'm sure they would have honored a potential buyer's request. If this is the case, those cars have to be quite rare, because I have never heard of a non-M030 1989 Turbo.

Just my thoughts.


Quick Reply: 89 turbo, It's gotta go



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:10 AM.