Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Model Differences - 944 and 944s

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2004, 03:09 PM
  #16  
Dave
Race Car
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Springfield NJ
Posts: 4,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The weight difference is only a few lbs, the '84 is pretty heavy for an NA (more steel than the later cars and adds PS to the '83) and the '87S isn't much heavier than the '86 (the lightest NA). I found a higher number for the NA than Tifo did (2840 Lb) and couldn't find a number for the S but 50-90 Lb is a good guess.
As per Tifo's post, the S gearbox has a steeper 1st, 2nd and 3rd than the NA but the NA has stiffer gearing in 4th and 5th. I have to admit to being confused by the comment about the final drive ratio, the NA and S both have a final ratio of 3.89:1, I don't recall the number but the turbo's final is numerically lower than the NA/S.
Old 06-21-2004, 03:15 PM
  #17  
tifosiman
Race Director
 
tifosiman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: The Heart of it All
Posts: 12,208
Received 16 Likes on 10 Posts
Default

I pulled those numbers right from the factory manual. I guess it could be off though.........
Old 06-21-2004, 03:16 PM
  #18  
Dave
Race Car
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Springfield NJ
Posts: 4,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally posted by FormulaOne10
...As for the car itself, it won't feel quite as nimble. My 84 felt lighter. This could also be due to the longer control arms in the later models. I'm not sure why it feels like this, but it does.....and later offset wheels can be fit, meaning you can run many of the new porsche model wheels. I run 02' 996 wheels on the street and they are terrific...
More unsprung weight would cause this. I'm guessing your '84 had cookies or Fuchs on it, pretty much ALL the newer wheels are heavier and since they are almost all larger the weight is further from the center of the wheel. Get lighter wheels and the S will have more of the feel of the earlier car, of course if you have ABS there is a little extra mass that isn't helping the handling.
Old 06-21-2004, 03:21 PM
  #19  
Dave
Race Car
 
Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Springfield NJ
Posts: 4,937
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally posted by tifosiman
I pulled those numbers right from the factory manual. I guess it could be off though.........
You know how it goes, two factory sources rarely match! (eg Guards and India red are both mentioned by the factory for '86) Either way it is a pretty small weight difference when viewed as a percentage.
Old 06-21-2004, 03:52 PM
  #20  
Porsche-O-Phile
Banned
 
Porsche-O-Phile's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: In self-imposed exile.
Posts: 14,072
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

My early '85 has front & rear sway bars, although the rear one is kind of small (I'll probably end up upgrading it to a larger one). Mine came with the "factory handling package" so this might've been an option as opposed to standard equipment on the later "S" models. So an early car MIGHT have a sway bar, might not.
Old 06-21-2004, 04:39 PM
  #21  
Jim 944S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Jim 944S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: boca raton, florida
Posts: 4,577
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Dan...

35? as in "hundred" right?

I paid 4500 $ for mine about four years ago. All records (although those just indicate that the PO paid to have something done, it doesn't guarantee that it was Done correctly), All leather, etc. Runs great.

Wonderful car!!! Good Luck and, hopefully, welcome to the double cam club!

Jim 1987 944S
Old 06-21-2004, 07:17 PM
  #22  
Tom
Pro
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Rear sway bars were an option on both cars. My 87 S feels more powerful that my 84. It also has 16" wheels as opposed to 15" on the 84 but 15" Phone dials were standard 944S. I think the performance difference is within driver difference a good driver in the 84 will beat an average driver in the S. I noticed that I had more headroom in the earlier car and I seem to sit closer to the windshielt with the later dash car. Brakes on the S are a bit more prone to fade. The S likes to run more freely in the upper (3500+) RPM range. The big maintenence difference is paying attention to the chain tensioner ($300 every 100,000 mi). S owners should have lurking in the back of our heads that the cam gear sprockets will eventually wear out.
Old 06-21-2004, 07:22 PM
  #23  
Tom
Pro
 
Tom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 721
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Forgot to mention the climate control on the newer cars is a great improvement but the 944S has put me through sunroof gera hell where I never had a problem with the "old" style on the 84.
Old 06-21-2004, 07:44 PM
  #24  
v944god
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
v944god's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 1,865
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

3500 is pretty cheap, I would buy one for a family member if I found it at that price.
Old 06-21-2004, 08:19 PM
  #25  
elvisizer
Racer
 
elvisizer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: el cerrito, ca
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

yeah, 3500 isn't bad at all. mine was $3000, and the paint is shot, and it had 215,000 miles when I bought it. of course, it did have complete maintenance records going back to the original purchase, and everything except the paint was in good shape.
i've had it for about 2 years, and i've spent about another $3000 on maintenance at 2 porsche specialist shops. (timing belt + rollers + seals, new chain tensioner, main rear seal, all new water hoses, new exhaust system from the header back, and other misc. stuff)
Old 06-21-2004, 10:41 PM
  #26  
FormulaOne10
Rennlist Member
 
FormulaOne10's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 537
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

On a side note, I did run my S at the track with the phone dials (similar weight to the fuchs on my 84) and the handling didn't feel quite as nimble. I actually still run the phone dials with R-compund for autocross and use the 996 wheels for street and DE. I did run a good deal of negative camber on my 84 and I'm thinking that it could also be the culprit.
Old 06-22-2004, 01:23 AM
  #27  
Redlyne_mr2
Racer
 
Redlyne_mr2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Alberta
Posts: 493
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

143hp..I always thought the NA's had 163....which would make sense because I dynoed 131whp which thus makes 143hp undrated..does anyone have any feedback?
Old 06-22-2004, 06:25 AM
  #28  
944Play
Pro
 
944Play's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 617
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

ROW cars (10.6[?]:1 CR) made 163.
USA cars (9.5:1 CR) made 143 (claimed - improvements were made without raising the numbers).
The 1988 world market engine (10.2:1 CR) made 158.



Quick Reply: Model Differences - 944 and 944s



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:09 PM.