Notices
924/931/944/951/968 Forum Porsche 924, 924S, 931, 944, 944S, 944S2, 951, and 968 discussion, how-to guides, and technical help. (1976-1995)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

944 becomes avgerage

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-21-2004 | 12:43 AM
  #1  
Ben Plaisted's Avatar
Ben Plaisted
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 467
Likes: 0
From: Portland, Maine
Default 944 becomes avgerage

I was searching 0-60 and 1/4 mile times on Car-stats.com and looked at the averages for the year 2003 they are almost exactly identical to the times posted for my 944. It took 15 years for the world to catch up. here are the links:

1989 944 NA http://www.car-stats.com/stats/shows...tsgivenid.aspx

Year 2003 avg: http://www.car-stats.com/stats/showstats/averages.aspx

Old 02-21-2004 | 12:47 AM
  #2  
jabbadeznuts's Avatar
jabbadeznuts
Race Car
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,844
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OR (this place is a sh!t hole)
Default

Yes, however, the 944 was (still is) a sports car in the '80s. It was quick then. Now it's about as fast as an Accord.
Old 02-21-2004 | 01:25 AM
  #3  
Blue S2's Avatar
Blue S2
Race Car
 
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
From: Washington, D.C.
Default

Yeah but its a lot more fun than an accord, and still looks better than most cars produced. And it still out handles most cars.
Old 02-21-2004 | 01:29 AM
  #4  
jabbadeznuts's Avatar
jabbadeznuts
Race Car
 
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 4,844
Likes: 0
From: Salem, OR (this place is a sh!t hole)
Default

Originally posted by Blue S2
Yeah but its a lot more fun than an accord, and still looks better than most cars produced. And it still out handles most cars.
Old 02-21-2004 | 01:33 AM
  #5  
MTM's Avatar
MTM
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 591
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, California
Default

How come that site says the 944S is slower than the 2.7L 944? The S makes like 188 horsepower, whereas the '89 944 is 162, right?
Old 02-21-2004 | 02:30 AM
  #6  
Epic2112's Avatar
Epic2112
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 3,879
Likes: 1
From: Silver Spring, MD
Default

That site is way off. I looked up 87 and 88 M3s, which are identical cars, and the stats were different.
Old 02-21-2004 | 03:50 AM
  #7  
theedge's Avatar
theedge
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 14,242
Likes: 3
From: Canada, Eh?
Default

IMHO I dont give a crap that some new sedan might be faster...

Chances are mine cost less to buy, and again IMHO a 944 is miles ahead in the exterior and interior looks than 99% of new cars.

So many new cars today have such horrendous interiors...
Old 02-21-2004 | 04:41 AM
  #8  
MTM's Avatar
MTM
Pro
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 591
Likes: 1
From: San Jose, California
Default

You know, even if those numbers are all accurate, it's probably not representative of the actual average. I bet a honda civic counts for just as much of the overall average as a ferrari 360, but in real life there are way more civics than ferraris.
Old 02-21-2004 | 10:47 AM
  #9  
BeerBurner's Avatar
BeerBurner
Unbannable
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 11,965
Likes: 92
From: Sterling, VA
Default

Today's economy car is yesterday's sports car and last week's race car.

BB.
Old 02-21-2004 | 10:57 AM
  #10  
Awoir's Avatar
Awoir
Banned
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
From: York, PA
Default

Is it just me or is that site WAY off? It says an 86 944 NA goes 0-60 in 8.9 sec...but I know I can do that in about 7...=\
Old 02-21-2004 | 11:15 AM
  #11  
Luis de Prat's Avatar
Luis de Prat
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 9,714
Likes: 7
From: Barcelona
Default

Yeah, I'd like to see where those new "average cars" are 20 years from now. Probably recycled into some hybrid automobile.
Old 02-21-2004 | 12:26 PM
  #12  
Kurt's Avatar
Kurt
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
From: USA
Default

Originally posted by jabbadeznuts
Now it's about as fast as an Accord
Until you turn the steering wheel!
Old 02-21-2004 | 01:00 PM
  #13  
JimV8's Avatar
JimV8
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 26,390
Likes: 497
From: Ontario
Default

Right on Kurt, the steering on the 944 definately is a tad above average. All in all the 944 is about quickness and precison. The only things quicker are gokarts.
Old 02-21-2004 | 01:16 PM
  #14  
Sach951's Avatar
Sach951
Pro
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 725
Likes: 0
From: A2, MI
Default

Anyone timed their NA/S/89 0 - 60?
Old 02-21-2004 | 02:37 PM
  #15  
KuHL 951's Avatar
KuHL 951
Hey Man
Rennlist Member

 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 16,525
Likes: 188
From: Nor Cal, Seal Rock, OR
Default

I'm always amazed at what cars weigh today compared to our mid-80's 944's. Even with front wheel drive, light-weight components, and reduction in glass area many of todays models are porking up due to crash test requirements, air-bags, dB reductions, and larger wheel-tire combos. Even an early 90's Miata at 2200 lbs has gained about 200+ lbs over the years. The 944's have always impressed me more for useable mid-range power than killer 0-60 times. I'm curious what the track guys have been able to get their 951's down to as bare bones racers?



Quick Reply: 944 becomes avgerage



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:31 PM.