They are off on the S2 0-60! ERRR its faster than that.

http://www.albeedigital.com/supercou...0-60times.html

 

doesnt have times for the 912.

 

912 whats that?? heheh kidding. Actually this link is crap some of the times are propostorous.

 

old car did it in 9.2, new car in 6.0...

I shaved a nice 3.2 seconds off the time, not bad...

(civic-->951)

~Eyal

 

heres the original, stock 912 specs per the 912 registry website, in seconds. stock 912 engines are 1600 cc. mine is 1750cc, with big bore kit.


0-60
912 11.6 sec
912E 13.0

0-80
912 19.9
912E n/a

0-90
912 24.7
912E 29.5

1/4 mile
912 18.1
912E 18.2

top speed
912 119mph
912E 110mph

hp
912 102sae /90 din@5800
912E 86@4900

torque
912 120sae /90Din@3500
912E 98@4000


to see more specs and details visit http://912registry.org/faqs/origspec.htm

 

Not porsche related but I'm still amazed my old buick grand national, bone stock from the factory 0-60 4.9. still one of the fastest cars ever built. great link

 

For a more comprehensive list of 924, 944 and 968 results, see http://www.weissach.net/924-944-968_...stSummary.html

If you're interested in 964/993 results, see http://www.weissach.net/964-993_RoadTestSummary.html

Sorry, no 912 lists... yet.

Karl.

 

i second that! my dad and i have two '86 t-type's and they are sweet

 

Maybe your S2 is faster, but October 1989 Road & Track has the S2 at 6.7 & 14.7@96mph. with a skidpad of .86 & slalom of 63.6 mph.

and +- 5.8 & 14.4 @ 98mph for the 93 camaro is what motor trend, car & driver & autoweek have for the camaro in 93. SLP says thier level one suspension (basically what is in my camaro) brings the skidpad up from .86 to .90G.

Check out this link
http://www.lingenfelter.com/powertoweight.asp

 

How do you find your camaro in terms of straight acceleration compared to the S2?

 

1986 Porsche 944 Turbo 6.0 14.6
1988 Porsche 944 Turbo 6.6 15.1

Umm...THAT is not right. The times on this list are waaayyy wrong in places.

 

you have to understand that these are compiled by different sources. While motor trend tends to get fairly good times, hence good drivers, Road and Trac often tend to get horrible ties and data, hence driver we would own. thats what you see that difference.
~Eyal

 

the camaro pulls much better than the S2. 0-60 doesnt register the torque the car has. when i bought the car it had BFG 275/40/17 tires on it. without trying the rear end lit up in any gear just by pressing the gas.

turns were a whole nother story. the solid axle sucks. i got most of the bugs out but the stock 944S2 handles better.

 

C'mon I realize that an 84 944 is no speed demon. but 9.0 seconds to 60, give me a break.

I know I can beat a Kia.

 

whats up with that. Its the same car.