Notices
914/914-6 Forum 1969-1976
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

1970 914, V8

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-10-2002, 03:31 AM
  #1  
deni durrell
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
 
deni durrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: LA, Calif., USA
Posts: 1,887
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post 1970 914, V8

Yes another one bites the dust.. take a look at what we've been talking about:


<a href="http://forums.rennlist.com/forums/ultimatebb.php?ubb=get_topic&f=15&t=006443" target="_blank">Check out this former 914...</a>


ouch!

Old 05-10-2002, 03:48 AM
  #2  
hitbyastick
Three Wheelin'
 
hitbyastick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Livermore, California
Posts: 1,781
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

It don't look bad. It looks pretty modern, or at least 80's. But why a Buick V8? Why not a 3.0 or something Porsche. <img src="graemlins/c.gif" border="0" alt="[ouch]" />
Old 05-10-2002, 01:15 PM
  #3  
Charles Navarro
Rennlist Member
 
Charles Navarro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Momence, IL
Posts: 2,447
Received 1,070 Likes on 556 Posts
Post

<strong>It don't look bad. It looks pretty modern, or at least 80's. But why a Buick V8? Why not a 3.0 or something Porsche. <img src="graemlins/c.gif" border="0" alt="[ouch]" /> </strong>

I agree. It must have taken some serious time, money, and pain and sweat to get the body that refined. Its really modern looking, and for what it is, is an amazing piece. After prototyping products in fiberglass, I think I never want to every touch a resin again, let alone put it on my car.

But I agree about the V8. We work with a speed shop with alot of our prototyping, and you get people that come in an see our 2.6 L type 4 based powerplant and say- "why not throw a chevy in there or a corvair motor, i bet it will haul *** then..." Little do they care about the weight (let alone the weight distribution). They also tell us- "I had a bug with a 454 and it was fast as all hell." But did it handle? I think not. That is why people fork out the big bucks for a Porsche vs a Corvette. 0-60 times are not all that matter. Its how you use the power

Take care,

Charles Navarro
LN Engineering
<a href="http://www.LNengineering.com" target="_blank">http://www.LNengineering.com</a>
Aircooled Precision Performance
Old 05-10-2002, 03:49 PM
  #4  
JPIII
Advanced
 
JPIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver, WA
Posts: 75
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

That's an alloy V8.... early Olds/Buick.
The more modern 4.2L Rover V8 is based on this motor.
Old 05-17-2002, 05:40 PM
  #5  
zymurgist
7th Gear
 
zymurgist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Hagerstown, MD
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

What does putting in a V8 do to the weight distribution? Since the engine is in the middle, it doesn't change it that much... does it? Just curious...
Old 05-18-2002, 03:22 AM
  #6  
Tabor
Drifting
 
Tabor's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 2,779
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Not that this car is "bad" or anything, buy why? It doesn't look like a 914, it doesn't sound like a 914, it doesn't have a 914 engine (or Porsche for that matter). Why even start with a 914? Why do this to it?

To each his own I guess.
Old 05-26-2002, 08:53 PM
  #7  
CBass
Racer
 
CBass's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Posts: 257
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Probably because it is cheap, light and mid engined.

I can tell you why they used a Buick 215 V8 though, it is lighter than the 4 cyl.



Quick Reply: 1970 914, V8



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:37 AM.