Notices
912 Forum 1965-1969

Compression test question

Old 04-12-2015, 12:49 AM
  #1  
911F1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,013
Received 309 Likes on 191 Posts
Default Compression test question

I'm looking at a car that has the following compression numbers:
1) 145psi 2)140psi 3)120psi and 4) 150psi

#3 is 10% lower than the others. Is this a problem?

I was told this could be the potential problem-
"The cooling air to #3cylinder is blocked by the oil cooler so it tends to run hotter and as a result it tends to wear faster than the other cylinders."




Any help is much appreciated.
Thanks
Old 04-12-2015, 01:32 AM
  #2  
Grease Monkey
Instructor
 
Grease Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I had similar numbers on my 68 on my #3, drove it a all last Spring and Summer and burned about a quart of oil every 500 miles, opted to overhaul the engine this Winter. The #3 piston and cylinder were pretty ugly when I pulled them, hope to have it back on the road in the next few weeks.
Old 04-12-2015, 01:01 PM
  #3  
911F1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,013
Received 309 Likes on 191 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Grease Monkey
I had similar numbers on my 68 on my #3, drove it a all last Spring and Summer and burned about a quart of oil every 500 miles, opted to overhaul the engine this Winter. The #3 piston and cylinder were pretty ugly when I pulled them, hope to have it back on the road in the next few weeks.
Hmm, seems like a potential big job issue. Can you share how extensive a repair and bill you had? Did the car smoke on start up? or just eat oil?
Thanks
Old 04-12-2015, 02:09 PM
  #4  
Grease Monkey
Instructor
 
Grease Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Yes it a pretty big job. I am doing most of the work myself, new pistons, rings, cylinders, bearings, and seals. I have not totaled all of my receipts (afraid to know).

It did smoke a little at start up. What I found when I disassembled was that the piston ridge between the top 2 piston rings had broken loose in a 2 inch section on the #3, all the other pistons were good.
Old 04-12-2015, 02:43 PM
  #5  
911F1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,013
Received 309 Likes on 191 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Grease Monkey
Yes it a pretty big job. I am doing most of the work myself, new pistons, rings, cylinders, bearings, and seals. I have not totaled all of my receipts (afraid to know).

It did smoke a little at start up. What I found when I disassembled was that the piston ridge between the top 2 piston rings had broken loose in a 2 inch section on the #3, all the other pistons were good.
Very cool your doing the work yourself. Do you remember your exact compression numbers?
Old 04-12-2015, 07:19 PM
  #6  
Grease Monkey
Instructor
 
Grease Monkey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 126
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I don't remember the numbers. I should have written them down. I do remember all the cylinders except #3 where with in specs. but #3 was slightly below the specs. The car had sat for almost 20 years so I was hoping it was a stuck ring. I squirted marves mystery oil into the cylinder and let it set overnight.
Old 04-13-2015, 10:23 AM
  #7  
Mr Michael B

Lifetime Rennlist
Member

 
Mr Michael B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Central US of A
Posts: 2,325
Received 66 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

For compression numbers I take the highest number & look for the other numbers to be close to within 15% or so / for what can be considered acceptable street engine use & performance (this does not apply to race engines).

So say 150 is your highest... With my 15% range I would find a reading of 127 as your lowest to be within acceptable parameters. That is not saying that your 120 low reading wont work for you, but it does exceed my acceptable mechanical range for normal use & performance.

Now as Monkey said you could have a stuck ring in that cylinder, or the car may just benefit from a spirited drive or two that could perhaps improve the low cylinders readings. These engine are that simple.

Test it twice to confirm. Follow up with a leak down test to pinpoint the potential weak area.
Old 04-13-2015, 07:44 PM
  #8  
911F1
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
911F1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,013
Received 309 Likes on 191 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mr Michael B
For compression numbers I take the highest number & look for the other numbers to be close to within 15% or so / for what can be considered acceptable street engine use & performance (this does not apply to race engines).

So say 150 is your highest... With my 15% range I would find a reading of 127 as your lowest to be within acceptable parameters. That is not saying that your 120 low reading wont work for you, but it does exceed my acceptable mechanical range for normal use & performance.

Now as Monkey said you could have a stuck ring in that cylinder, or the car may just benefit from a spirited drive or two that could perhaps improve the low cylinders readings. These engine are that simple.

Test it twice to confirm. Follow up with a leak down test to pinpoint the potential weak area.
Mr Michael B, I sent you a PM. in regards to PPI's in St Louis. Much appreciated!


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Compression test question



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 04:04 PM.