Notices
911 Turbo (930) Forum 1975-1989

Andial v Kokeln intercooler

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-10-2002, 08:32 AM
  #1  
jat930
4th Gear
Thread Starter
 
jat930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Andial v Kokeln intercooler

Dear All

Many posts suggest Kokeln intercooler is preferred (assuming air con etc is kept).

Is anybody aware of performance difference between this unit and Andial's "sport" intercooler.

Am asking because I will be sourcing some parts from Andial

Thanks
Old 04-10-2002, 02:44 PM
  #2  
ZCAT3
Three Wheelin'
 
ZCAT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Kokeln has a "competetive analysis" on their website:

Charged side face area in square inches; Cubic inch mass

Stock 21.4; 258
Andial (Garretson) 72.6; 508
Ruf 53.5; 498
Kokeln 73.0; 642

You can view this at <a href="http://www.kokeln.com/INTERCOOLER.HTM" target="_blank">http://www.kokeln.com/INTERCOOLER.HTM</a>

I have a Kokeln IC as that is what was recommended to me by many people. I have no doubt though that the Andial IC is very good - I have never heard anyone say bad things about Andial products (other than they are expensive
Old 04-22-2002, 05:27 PM
  #3  
JonM..
Instructor
 
JonM..'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: CA
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

DWAYNE DEMENT (OWNER OF KOKELN) ONCE WORKED FOR ANDIAL, AND COPIED ANDIALS, SO I'M SURE THEY ARE PRETTY MUCH THE SAME OTHER THAN A SMALL CID DIFFERENCE.



Quick Reply: Andial v Kokeln intercooler



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:41 AM.