Andial v Kokeln intercooler
#1
![Post](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Dear All
Many posts suggest Kokeln intercooler is preferred (assuming air con etc is kept).
Is anybody aware of performance difference between this unit and Andial's "sport" intercooler.
Am asking because I will be sourcing some parts from Andial
Thanks
Many posts suggest Kokeln intercooler is preferred (assuming air con etc is kept).
Is anybody aware of performance difference between this unit and Andial's "sport" intercooler.
Am asking because I will be sourcing some parts from Andial
Thanks
#2
Three Wheelin'
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,276
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Post](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Kokeln has a "competetive analysis" on their website:
Charged side face area in square inches; Cubic inch mass
Stock 21.4; 258
Andial (Garretson) 72.6; 508
Ruf 53.5; 498
Kokeln 73.0; 642
You can view this at <a href="http://www.kokeln.com/INTERCOOLER.HTM" target="_blank">http://www.kokeln.com/INTERCOOLER.HTM</a>
I have a Kokeln IC as that is what was recommended to me by many people. I have no doubt though that the Andial IC is very good - I have never heard anyone say bad things about Andial products (other than they are expensive
Charged side face area in square inches; Cubic inch mass
Stock 21.4; 258
Andial (Garretson) 72.6; 508
Ruf 53.5; 498
Kokeln 73.0; 642
You can view this at <a href="http://www.kokeln.com/INTERCOOLER.HTM" target="_blank">http://www.kokeln.com/INTERCOOLER.HTM</a>
I have a Kokeln IC as that is what was recommended to me by many people. I have no doubt though that the Andial IC is very good - I have never heard anyone say bad things about Andial products (other than they are expensive
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)