Suspension mods
#31
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Hmmm.. Too much traffic at a DE. I've ran faster laps at DE's than I have in the races actually. Still haven't figured out how that's worked out, but for me so far, that's the case.
Here's 15 laps at VIR at the First Settlers PCA DE in May:
http://www.1barsystems.com/videos/VIR15Laps.wmv
Here are the lap times from that session, in order (you can tell the laps where I run up on traffic and get held up):
2:08.50
2:08.45
2:08.56
2:08.32
2:08.77
2:09.38
2:08.51
2:11.63
2:09.97
2:09.05
2:08.31
2:09.69
2:08.86
2:11.12
2:08.84
This was on Hoosiers R3S05s that had 25+ cycles on them,with stock gearbox. I ran those tires for 3 days at the Zone2 PCA DE in April, the May CMP race with NASA, then the Friday and Sat at the FST event, and the video/times were from the last session on Sunday, so those tires had 8 days total on them, figure 3-4, sometimes 5 sessions per day, 25 sessions may be a conservative cycle count.
I don't know what the different C class/D-stock, and all that stuff means in PCA (too much mumbo jumbo to read if you asked me), but if he ran 2:09 in a stock 930 he's the man. I've ran VIR for 5 years, and have about 10K miles on the track, and I've ran against 964 cups, 930s, etc. Every 964 Cup, 930 or 965 turbo I've ran against at VIR I've passed at will and left, unless they've had Dunlops, and even then, I've still passed them in almost all instances that I can recall, I've just left them at a slower rate.
Not trying to argue. I just know what I've seen over the past 5 years at that particular track. I wish I had $5 for every time someone told me I should be running 2:05s at VIR. Then I wish I had $100 for every time I've taken them for a ride and they've said "I think you're gettin all you're gonna get".
Regarding A930Rocket's original question, he's not trying to compare a 965 turbo, or 964 cup car to his car. He's asking about coilovers, on a 930, at a specific track, and asking for those lap times.
Brian
Here's 15 laps at VIR at the First Settlers PCA DE in May:
http://www.1barsystems.com/videos/VIR15Laps.wmv
Here are the lap times from that session, in order (you can tell the laps where I run up on traffic and get held up):
2:08.50
2:08.45
2:08.56
2:08.32
2:08.77
2:09.38
2:08.51
2:11.63
2:09.97
2:09.05
2:08.31
2:09.69
2:08.86
2:11.12
2:08.84
This was on Hoosiers R3S05s that had 25+ cycles on them,with stock gearbox. I ran those tires for 3 days at the Zone2 PCA DE in April, the May CMP race with NASA, then the Friday and Sat at the FST event, and the video/times were from the last session on Sunday, so those tires had 8 days total on them, figure 3-4, sometimes 5 sessions per day, 25 sessions may be a conservative cycle count.
I don't know what the different C class/D-stock, and all that stuff means in PCA (too much mumbo jumbo to read if you asked me), but if he ran 2:09 in a stock 930 he's the man. I've ran VIR for 5 years, and have about 10K miles on the track, and I've ran against 964 cups, 930s, etc. Every 964 Cup, 930 or 965 turbo I've ran against at VIR I've passed at will and left, unless they've had Dunlops, and even then, I've still passed them in almost all instances that I can recall, I've just left them at a slower rate.
Not trying to argue. I just know what I've seen over the past 5 years at that particular track. I wish I had $5 for every time someone told me I should be running 2:05s at VIR. Then I wish I had $100 for every time I've taken them for a ride and they've said "I think you're gettin all you're gonna get".
Regarding A930Rocket's original question, he's not trying to compare a 965 turbo, or 964 cup car to his car. He's asking about coilovers, on a 930, at a specific track, and asking for those lap times.
Brian
#32
Rennlist Member
Originally Posted by BrianKeithSmith
Yes Van. I'm still running whatever was on the car. Haven't changed anything other than sway bar settings.
I definitely paid Ken too much for this thing!
Brian
I definitely paid Ken too much for this thing!
Brian
#33
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Mount Pleasant, South Carolina
Posts: 7,568
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
Sounds like a nice guy. LOL
I gotta say it looks great, Brian drives it like he stole it and I wish I could keep up.
I gotta say it looks great, Brian drives it like he stole it and I wish I could keep up.
Originally Posted by VZ935
Don't feel too bad.. you may have paid too much , but he never finished paying me what he owed ! I ended up getting the 3.4 crank fired twin plug single turbo motor back and the short bell 4speed. I had to fly to NC and "repo " it !
#34
Nordschleife Master
Originally Posted by BrianKeithSmith
the May CMP race with NASA
...
I don't know what the different C class/D-stock, and all that stuff means in PCA (too much mumbo jumbo to read if you asked me), but if he ran 2:09 in a stock 930 he's the man. I've ran VIR for 5 years, and have about 10K miles on the track, and I've ran against 964 cups, 930s, etc. Every 964 Cup, 930 or 965 turbo I've ran against at VIR I've passed at will and left, unless they've had Dunlops, and even then, I've still passed them in almost all instances that I can recall, I've just left them at a slower rate.
...
I don't know what the different C class/D-stock, and all that stuff means in PCA (too much mumbo jumbo to read if you asked me), but if he ran 2:09 in a stock 930 he's the man. I've ran VIR for 5 years, and have about 10K miles on the track, and I've ran against 964 cups, 930s, etc. Every 964 Cup, 930 or 965 turbo I've ran against at VIR I've passed at will and left, unless they've had Dunlops, and even then, I've still passed them in almost all instances that I can recall, I've just left them at a slower rate.
And yes, Chris Castagna was in a stock '89 930 on Hoosiers when he did a 2:09. He car was in C class, so he basically had a a stiff suspension, a short R&P and some big Hoosiers. And that was on a weekend were it rained most of the time and he only got in a few dry laps. It was alos the same weekend as a pro race (grand am?) so there were only 2 runs per day. He likely would have gone significantly lower with better conditions & more track time.
From what I have seen, NASA racing is not quite up to PCA club race times yet. Ron Savenor destoryed the entire field at the NASA Watkins Glen race, and he was dawdling along in the 2:09s (he ran 2:05 at the PCA race...).
To get this back on point, a well driven 930 with super stiff TBars can be very fast on the track. But coil-overs allow you to go to even a stiffer setup, and ultimately the car will be faster. How much faster will depend on the track. At bumpy tracks like Lime Rock or Sebring, coilovers will probably not do much good as you don't want a super stiff suspension. But at a really smooth track like the newly repaved Mid Ohio, I'd guess they could be a 1-1.5 second difference. VIR, assuming it is still smooth, would likely be about the same 1-1.5 seconds (I haven't been to VIR since 2002).
#36
Nordschleife Master
Originally Posted by BrianKeithSmith
And from what I've seen, the PCA guys just like to wreck alot.
I actually am going to do a couple of NASA races next year. VIR might be one of them. I think I'll be in GTS3, but still need to do a dyno.
Btw, have you ever run Watkins Glen?
#37
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Concord, NC
Posts: 2,882
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
No ,never been there.
You ever been to CMP? 930s don't even get into 4th gear there, we only use 2 gears (2nd and 3rd). By the time you get some boost you have to stand on the brakes to make the next corner.
My best lap at CMP is a 1:46.9xxx.
I guess I just suck. There can be no other explanation...
Brian
Brian
You ever been to CMP? 930s don't even get into 4th gear there, we only use 2 gears (2nd and 3rd). By the time you get some boost you have to stand on the brakes to make the next corner.
My best lap at CMP is a 1:46.9xxx.
I guess I just suck. There can be no other explanation...
Brian
Brian
#38
Nordschleife Master
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Mount Pleasant, South Carolina
Posts: 7,568
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes
on
3 Posts
A five speed and a short R&P is a huge difference to a stock 4 speed and R&P with Dunlops bought used (and who knows how many heat cycles).
And yes, Chris Castagna was in a stock '89 930 on Hoosiers when he did a 2:09. He car was in C class, so he basically had a a stiff suspension, a short R&P and some big Hoosiers.
Originally Posted by 38D
And yes, Chris Castagna was in a stock '89 930 on Hoosiers when he did a 2:09. He car was in C class, so he basically had a a stiff suspension, a short R&P and some big Hoosiers.
#39
Nordschleife Master
Originally Posted by BrianKeithSmith
You ever been to CMP?
Originally Posted by BrianKeithSmith
I guess I just suck. There can be no other explanation...
Then, you go to a couple of NASA races. Sure there are 7-8 faster cars, but they are not in your class, so again, you don't really have too push hard. Nor do you have a good benchmark of what your car/class is capable of. You're winning you class easily, and beating all the lower GTS classes. Again, you don't have to push to be fast.
Ron Savenor is registered for the NASA nationals at Mid Ohio. He'll be in a 964 Euro Cup in GTS4. He is one of PCA's best, so will be a very good yardstick.
#41
Rennlist Member
Yep.. my old car . Woody and Tom drive those things every weekend . I wouldn't be surprised if they drive them to get groceries ! Here is what it looked like when I first got it
Then changed to match the black car in 2001
Then changed to match the black car in 2001
#43
Instructor
Thread Starter
Didn't mean to open a can of worms on the coilovers vs torsion bar debate! It's time to refresh the suspension and I'm looking for a reasonable cost effective plug and play kind of solution, that I only have to do once. I know that pretty much whatever I do it will be a huge improvement over the 25 year old stock stuff but I don't want to get overly complicated since, I'm not at the track at every oopportunity. Reading through all the posts has given me a few ideas that I can kick around - thanks!
#44
Former Vendor
Too much of the advice in this thread reads like one-size-fits-all. It doesn't.
VZ935 drives .....wait for it....... a 935. And has a lot of racing experience. Coils are the right solution for him and probably a handful of others reading this thread. But these needs are not in line with the vast majority reading this thread.
There is no inherent performance benefit to coil overs. Their advantage is they are easier to change out track-side and can achieve higher wheel rates than tbars. Down side - cost and the need to reinforce the chassis. If you don't plan on running super high rates or changing springs trackside, you will do just as well with tbars.
Bottom line is that coils are right for a few, but the vast majority of the people reading this thread can save their money and stick with tbars.
VZ935 drives .....wait for it....... a 935. And has a lot of racing experience. Coils are the right solution for him and probably a handful of others reading this thread. But these needs are not in line with the vast majority reading this thread.
There is no inherent performance benefit to coil overs. Their advantage is they are easier to change out track-side and can achieve higher wheel rates than tbars. Down side - cost and the need to reinforce the chassis. If you don't plan on running super high rates or changing springs trackside, you will do just as well with tbars.
Bottom line is that coils are right for a few, but the vast majority of the people reading this thread can save their money and stick with tbars.
#45
Rennlist Member
Actually Chuck I never mentioned my 935 . RSRS saw my old 935 running at his local track and made a post I responded to.
I have driven my 930 track car more than any of my other cars . I have had that same 930 since 1994 so I have been racing it for quite a long time. You may have missed my post in this thread where I based my opinion on experience from 10 years or so ago when I went from TB to CO . I became considerably faster than any other 911/930's in my area ( same as your area I am in Burlingame) after that up grade and I had previously had the trick TB suspension . I think that experience applies to the thread . I wasn't talking about my 935's.This is a 911 turbo forum so I assumed that is what we were talking about.
I don't follow the development of TBs these days so I guess it is possible the continual evolution of the torsion bar has closed the gap .Bottom line is we are talking about Porsche's.. inherently they handle and brake well.. so torsion bars or coil overs...I don't see how you can go wrong either way. Your gonna have a great time with your car.
I have driven my 930 track car more than any of my other cars . I have had that same 930 since 1994 so I have been racing it for quite a long time. You may have missed my post in this thread where I based my opinion on experience from 10 years or so ago when I went from TB to CO . I became considerably faster than any other 911/930's in my area ( same as your area I am in Burlingame) after that up grade and I had previously had the trick TB suspension . I think that experience applies to the thread . I wasn't talking about my 935's.This is a 911 turbo forum so I assumed that is what we were talking about.
I don't follow the development of TBs these days so I guess it is possible the continual evolution of the torsion bar has closed the gap .Bottom line is we are talking about Porsche's.. inherently they handle and brake well.. so torsion bars or coil overs...I don't see how you can go wrong either way. Your gonna have a great time with your car.