Notices
911 Turbo (930) Forum 1975-1989

New To board...Best year turbo of the 80's

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-14-2004, 07:44 PM
  #1  
BrandonHentges
1st Gear
Thread Starter
 
BrandonHentges's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Green Bay, WI
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default New To board...Best year turbo of the 80's

Im currently an ower of a 87 toyota supra turbo. My car has around 450rwhp, so im pretty familar with the maintence, etc. As the title says, im looking for an 80's porsche 911 turbo manual . Can anybody help me on distinguishing the differences or which year in the 80's made the best turbo. Im looking for the price not to exceed 30k, Im pretty sure I could get one with great miles for that price. I am also a fan of the 930 turbo slantnose, but it must be a hardtop Im just really looking for the year with few problems and great potential. Any help would be greatly appreciated thanks guys
Brandon
Old 12-14-2004, 08:46 PM
  #2  
jhunt@huntinter
Pro
 
jhunt@huntinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1979
Old 12-14-2004, 09:11 PM
  #3  
A930Rocket
Nordschleife Master
 
A930Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Mount Pleasant, South Carolina
Posts: 7,568
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

87
Old 12-14-2004, 10:03 PM
  #4  
turbocarrera.
Racer
 
turbocarrera.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: SK, Canada
Posts: 328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

77!.. jk :P

I'd go with the 78 or 79, though they are basically unchanged from 78 to 89 - they changed the rotors to a less expensive, non-floating type sometime after 79(I think) and they got 16x9 wheels in the rear for 86. The 89 got a 5spd tranny. The 80-85 are grey market so they need the proper federalization paperwork.

Any year 930 has great performance and massive potential.

Rocket, why do you pick the 87? You probably know something I don't - wouldn't be the first time...
Old 12-15-2004, 12:17 AM
  #5  
LukeSportsman
Racer
 
LukeSportsman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Indiana
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Doesn't the 78-79 have better flow potential? I don't think you'll want to go 86-87 as your choice for $30k target. I might just use quality vs. $$$ and leave the year where it falls. They are all getting old and for a turbo air cooled engine......maintenance is the key. You didn't say if your getting rid of the Supra. Is this going to be the next hp toy or are you wanting a sunny day fun ride. I would put more value in newer if "sunny day" car like maybe a lucky 3.3 car.

76-77 are non intercooled and would probably seem mild and slow coming from where you are.

Also, do you want to pay for "stock" or pay for "mod's"? You don't want a garage queen that has sit around and are charging big $$ for low mileage. I'd rather pay for a car that is driven and maintained.

For any 911/930 most of the $$ hangs out the back end. Brakes, trannys, and even body panels are all within reason. Interior pieces are not much different than any quality car (a new leather seat for my truck runs over $2500 so I'm not sure what that says). Mod's are the $$ in a hole option. Best way is to pay for them, if done correct, is penny's on the dollar at purchase rather than list later, if your interested in such. Suspension upgrades may not add much cost, but will save you much hassle later if you like the choices.
Old 12-15-2004, 12:40 AM
  #6  
JBH
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
JBH's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Putnam Valley, NY
Posts: 3,259
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I would also say the 78-79 years are best for upgrading to higher hp and torque. The fuel distributor on those cars was same as the Euro counterpart. Although I never made the comparison, I would expect these years to be lighter weight.

Getting to 400 rwhp is going to cost you a lot more than a Supra. I suggest you try to find one that has the basic work already done: SS exhaust system, larger intercooler, 7200 HF turbo, cams

With a 1 bar spring, that will get you close to 400 rwhp. Much beyond that, you need to change over to a different fueling and engine management system. Of course, a 5 speed tranny with close ratio gears would also be nice.
Old 12-15-2004, 03:15 AM
  #7  
jhunt@huntinter
Pro
 
jhunt@huntinter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 605
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

'78 and '79 fueling and engine management is just fine to 450hp. I know, I did it and tested it.

BTW: mine is for sale

www.my930.com
Old 12-15-2004, 10:01 PM
  #8  
A930Rocket
Nordschleife Master
 
A930Rocket's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Mount Pleasant, South Carolina
Posts: 7,568
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

No reason. Just the year I have. LOL

Originally Posted by turbocarrera.
Rocket, why do you pick the 87?
Old 12-16-2004, 02:46 AM
  #9  
Kesepton
Racer
 
Kesepton's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 265
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

hah, more than enough of a reason.
Old 12-16-2004, 09:10 AM
  #10  
Sameer
Race Car
 
Sameer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Singapore
Posts: 3,811
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

If your going to leave the car stock, go for the 89 turbo with bigger a/c vents, g50 g/box etc etc. If your going to modify it, than go for the earlier ones with the euro fuel distributor. Off course have the car inspected first inside out.
Old 12-16-2004, 03:03 PM
  #11  
NO-H2O
Instructor
 
NO-H2O's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 149
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I say 79
Old 12-16-2004, 07:57 PM
  #12  
UDPride
Thinking outside da' bun...
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
UDPride's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Dayton, Ohio
Posts: 11,529
Received 470 Likes on 242 Posts
Default

I will ***** the 88 model year 930. I believe the last 4spd slushbox production Porsche ever built.
Old 12-17-2004, 01:50 PM
  #13  
MitchB
Burning Brakes
 
MitchB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Dallas, then Annapolis - now Laguna Beach CA. Well, not so fast - I'm back in Dallas. For good!
Posts: 765
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I guess I'll weigh in too...
If you can find an '89, the fith gear is worth it. I have a 4 speed and it is really my only complaint.
The updated interior from '86 up is a significant upgrade IMHO. For that reason I would stay with the '86 and up...
As far as motor differences - face it - if you're here, you're going to mod it anyway....
Old 12-20-2004, 01:20 PM
  #14  
BlkBird
Intermediate
 
BlkBird's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Atlanta GA
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

1989 with a five speed. Makes all the difference.

A few changes later and... 389 rwHP and 425 ft.lbs torque at 4400 rpm.
Old 12-20-2004, 01:45 PM
  #15  
pete77930
Racer
 
pete77930's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Greensboro NC
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

77 930...The short stroke motors rev up faster. and once you go to 3.2 ltr p's/c's you can run with any of the 3.3 and 3.4 ltr cars. And as sson as I can afford EFI I'll be able to pass em too.


Quick Reply: New To board...Best year turbo of the 80's



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:15 AM.