Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Suspension balance question/help

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2015, 10:12 PM
  #16  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Reiver
Interesting approach....how did you decide upon that combination..you'd seen that done or what?
The guys at Rebel S assured me that going with the 150# Eibach springs was the perfect equivalent to the 27/28 rear bar. That may be so, but my car is on such a diet that it ended up being too harsh and nowhere near a match for my 21mm bars up front. In reality I think the reason I was steered toward the 150# Eibach springs is because Eibach doesn't make a lighter spring. I found the 60# and helper D Faulkner springs online after the fact and after searching for a solution. Turns out that D Faulkner springs are supposed to be a tightly held secret I am not supposed to know about. Even Steve W uses them on race builds. Actually got to talk to the owner of Faulkner and he assured me I would love his springs and that racers around the globe swear by them....he was right. Using the 2.25 dia will work on any Bilstein application, front or rear coilovers. Someday I will swap in the 100# Faulkner springs for the current 150's.
http://www.dfaulknersprings.com/acatalog/Specials.html
Old 12-22-2015, 10:46 PM
  #17  
Reiver
Drifting
Thread Starter
 
Reiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Posts: 2,526
Received 115 Likes on 76 Posts
Default

Pretty cool there Doug.
Old 12-22-2015, 10:59 PM
  #18  
race911
Rennlist Member
 
race911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Roseville, CA
Posts: 12,312
Likes: 0
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by amber lamps
The guys at Rebel S assured me that going with the 150# Eibach springs was the perfect equivalent to the 27/28 rear bar. That may be so, but my car is on such a diet that it ended up being too harsh and nowhere near a match for my 21mm bars up front. In reality I think the reason I was steered toward the 150# Eibach springs is because Eibach doesn't make a lighter spring. I found the 60# and helper D Faulkner springs online after the fact and after searching for a solution. Turns out that D Faulkner springs are supposed to be a tightly held secret I am not supposed to know about. Even Steve W uses them on race builds. Actually got to talk to the owner of Faulkner and he assured me I would love his springs and that racers around the globe swear by them....he was right. Using the 2.25 dia will work on any Bilstein application, front or rear coilovers. Someday I will swap in the 100# Faulkner springs for the current 150's.
http://www.dfaulknersprings.com/acatalog/Specials.html
We fiddled with all this in the '80s, and even into the '90s, based on similar that was going on with the 944 world. (944 Turbos were just starting to be developed, and they needed help in the rear.) Likely it was that combination of not being able to acquire a low, low rate spring, coupled with a pretty unsophisticated world of damper modification.

My one car at the time, a ~2400 lb. 3.5L running 225/245 tires was two seconds a lap slower on the then-new 1.9 mile Thunderhill layout with the last setup I used--a Bilstein racing shock wrapped inside a torsion bar/spring combo that was said to provide about a 600 lb/in rear rate.

One hilarious place I experimented was for the road course at PIR. No data in those days, but I had so much wedge with dissimilar springs (and ride height) left to right you had to turn the car to the right to go straight. But it definitely worked on the high-ish banking that is T3 and T4 there. (Sadly, that road course has been obliterated to make way for NASCAR--and in 2016 again, Indy Car--garages.)
Old 12-23-2015, 12:29 AM
  #19  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

The cool part for me is being able to adjust ride height and camber in a matter of minutes.
Old 12-23-2015, 01:27 AM
  #20  
Mondrian
Three Wheelin'
 
Mondrian's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 1,369
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

One of the specialist on this side of the pond has developed a set up with KW coilovers in front but TB's/dampers in rear. I haven't driven that setup but all the experienced guys who have rave on about it. Have not actually come across anyone that is happy with full coilover conversion for road use over here and a few who actually reverted back to TB/dampers.

Fitting SSI will be challenging if not impossible if you go the coilover route on rears too.

Doug you must do a whole thread on your suspension setup as it sounds pretty unique.
Old 12-23-2015, 02:05 AM
  #21  
Amber Gramps
Addict
 
Amber Gramps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Alta Loma Alone
Posts: 37,770
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 12 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mondrian
One of the specialist on this side of the pond has developed a set up with KW coilovers in front but TB's/dampers in rear. I haven't driven that setup but all the experienced guys who have rave on about it. Have not actually come across anyone that is happy with full coilover conversion for road use over here and a few who actually reverted back to TB/dampers.

Fitting SSI will be challenging if not impossible if you go the coilover route on rears too.

Doug you must do a whole thread on your suspension setup as it sounds pretty unique.
I've got the opposite of what you site. I've got normal 21mm Tbars up front with revalved Bilstein Sports inserts (off Ed's Ruby) in Bilstein struts. All bushings are stock or Elephant rubber with turbo tie rods and a strut brace. I do also have 930 brakes with floating rotors on Rebel S hats and a 23mm MC....Insane.

Out back I've got an old set of Bilstein Sports that were rebuilt by Bilstein San Diego with new valves, seals, 14mm rods, oil, bushings, serial numbers, and such and matched to the 27/28mm spring rate with the coilovers described above from Rebel S. Rear also has adjustable drop links and WEVO swaybar mounts. All bushings are stock rubber

I've collected the proper banjos, bolts, and lines to reconfigure my rear brake lines after creating a **** storm over doing it "wrong" the first time.

https://rennlist.com/forums/attachme...ors-brake8.jpg

https://rennlist.com/forums/attachme...arage-dang.jpg

Anyway, you get the point...

http://forums.pelicanparts.com/porsc...alipers-6.html

Old 12-23-2015, 01:43 PM
  #22  
rfloz
Advanced
 
rfloz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

IIRC when Porsche was developing the 935 they couldn't get enough stiffness with the maximum sized T-Bars that would fit and the rules required the they use T-Bars. So, they just added "helper" coil over springs.

Just one of many rules Porsche bent with that car, e.g., the rear window opening had to be retained. It was, they just built a new rear half roof with a more aero rear window. Same w. stock door panels, rear bumper, etc., etc.
Old 12-24-2015, 05:49 PM
  #23  
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems
RL Technical Advisor
 
Steve Weiner-Rennsport Systems's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Portland Oregon
Posts: 11,871
Likes: 0
Received 64 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rfloz
IIRC when Porsche was developing the 935 they couldn't get enough stiffness with the maximum sized T-Bars that would fit and the rules required the they use T-Bars. So, they just added "helper" coil over springs.
Actually, they started that practice with the '73 RSR, '74 RSR, and 934.



Quick Reply: Suspension balance question/help



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:30 PM.