Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Considering 93 C2 - problems?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-21-2002 | 03:04 AM
  #1  
clubted's Avatar
clubted
Thread Starter
Track Day
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post Considering 93 C2 - problems?

I'm considering a 93 Carrera 2, actually an RS America, kind of my dream car. Any pitfalls with this car as earlier C2's, i.e. premature valve guide wear, weak head studs, etc? Thanks for any info.
Old 06-21-2002 | 04:14 AM
  #2  
Adrian's Avatar
Adrian
Addict
Lead Rennlist
Technical Advisor
Rennlist
Lifetime Member

 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 8,027
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 16 Posts
From: Parafield Gardens
Talking

Again. Go to the 964 board. Most 964 owners hang out there.
The RS America is a very nice 964. You cannot go wrong really with these RSAs. Every engine wears. You pay your money you take your risks. The major contributing factor to the two items you mention is the person behind the wheel and attitude to ownership and where it was driven. I can asssure you that not every 964 3.6L engine suffers from worn anything. Many are heading towards 150,000 of your miles and have never been disassembled. Others have failed at 30,000 miles. However if you look into ownership you find some major differences in the environments they were used in,
Ciao,
Adrian
911C4
Old 06-21-2002 | 11:49 AM
  #3  
Drew_K's Avatar
Drew_K
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 1,003
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Texas
Post

I'm not aware of any chronic problems with the RSA's. The 964's haven't really had problems with weak head studs or premature valve guide wear, at least to the extent of the 911 3.2's. The 964's do have their own issues, but you'll avoid most, if not all, of these problems by purchasing a '93 or '94.

Drew
92 C2 Coupe
Old 06-21-2002 | 02:53 PM
  #4  
JonSeigel's Avatar
JonSeigel
Pro
 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 577
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
From: Sausalito, CA
Post

No problems with my '93. Not an RSA though.
Old 06-21-2002 | 03:32 PM
  #5  
Jim Michaels's Avatar
Jim Michaels
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
From: Blacksburg, VA
Post

Early '93 RSAs had the Freudenberg DMF that had a slightly higher "early failure" rate. Now it's too late for any more early failures. Later RSAs (starting with the May 13, 1992 build date, I recently read) got the LUK DMF. Early RSAs also didn't get the distributor vent kit. The kits are cheap and easy, so many have had those installed, but some of those may have somewhat weakened distributor drive belts from exposure to bad air before the venting.

The early C2 problems you mentioned had apparently been resolved before the RSA run started. I've been very pleased with my RSA. By this time (ten years) I've usually bought a newer P-car, but the RSA has been so right for me that I don't know when I could let it go. For its tenth birthday I got it new Alpine sound and Bilsteins. Nothing's too good for my baby. If you want to sound this sickening, get yourself a RSA.
Old 06-21-2002 | 07:16 PM
  #6  
Bill Gregory's Avatar
Bill Gregory
Technical Specialist
Rennlist
Lifetime Member
 
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 5,853
Likes: 0
Received 20 Likes on 17 Posts
From: TX
Post

Aside from normal maintenance, highly recommended!
Old 06-22-2002 | 02:39 AM
  #7  
clubted's Avatar
clubted
Thread Starter
Track Day
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 20
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post

Hi,

Thank you all for the advice. Thoughtful and useful as I've come to expect from this site.



Quick Reply: Considering 93 C2 - problems?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:27 AM.