Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

air intake mod...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-20-2008, 03:22 AM
  #1  
rnln
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
rnln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default air intake mod...

This is a nice air intake set up, right? Would I gain anything if I mod similar setup into my 911? Of course just the right side, and maybe lead it up to the inside of the tea-tray tail, and of course cold condense air is better than engine hot air, but proximately how much different will it give?

Old 08-20-2008, 04:52 AM
  #2  
JackOlsen
Race Car
 
JackOlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,920
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

Zero difference, unless your 911 is water-cooled. When the main engine blower is running under full throttle, so much air is sucked into the engine compartment that the temperature difference between the air inside the engine compartment and the air outside approaches zero.

(I've done the measurements.)
Old 08-20-2008, 10:18 AM
  #3  
scarceller
Racer
 
scarceller's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackOlsen
Zero difference, unless your 911 is water-cooled. When the main engine blower is running under full throttle, so much air is sucked into the engine compartment that the temperature difference between the air inside the engine compartment and the air outside approaches zero.

(I've done the measurements.)
100% agree, I have a WideBandO2 control system and have recorded intake air temps via the AirFlowMeter's intake air temp sensor and while doing normal street driving the intake air temp = ambient air temp.

The only time I could maybe see this not to be true would be with AC on. Most of the air comes into the engine bay via the deck lid entrance but if AC is on this air must first pass through the AC Cond. which could cause slight heating of the air. I do not have AC system so only a theory.

Don't waste good money on cold air system for these cars.
Old 08-20-2008, 11:02 AM
  #4  
ked
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
ked's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hsv AL
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think that air intake set-up is a fine approach... along w/ the rest of a 959 drivetrain.
Old 08-20-2008, 04:22 PM
  #5  
rnln
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
rnln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

:lol: ok ok... got it.
I have read related threads many times but still hope it'll make a little different. One of the thread Jack found that soon the car starts moving, fresh air circulate into the spot, but what about those seconds when you start off the line? Will it make any different when accelerate from stand still?
Thanks guys.

Originally Posted by ked
I think that air intake set-up is a fine approach... along w/ the rest of a 959 drivetrain.
Old 08-20-2008, 04:33 PM
  #6  
JackOlsen
Race Car
 
JackOlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,920
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

It compromises efficiency to make the engine suck air through a long straw. With water-cooloed cars, that trade-off can be worth it, since there is (more or less) stagnant air in the engine bay. But the blower on the 911 makes it a fundamentally different issue.

Those ducts you see on the 959 are coming from the intercoolers. Cooling intake temps on a turbo are a different game than with a normally-aspirated 911.

I'm not knocking the impulse to improve things. I tested a snorkle type intake and also a box that sectioned off intake air from the rest of the engine compartment. In my experience, neither provided any improvement.

But I can't judge anyone. After all, I'm the guy who tested a front wing.



(For the record, it was a bad idea.)
Old 08-20-2008, 06:11 PM
  #7  
flatsixnut
Burning Brakes
 
flatsixnut's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Tampa, Florida
Posts: 1,239
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by JackOlsen
But I can't judge anyone. After all, I'm the guy who tested a front wing.



God, I can see it now...after pics of this circulate to the civic forum.
Old 08-20-2008, 06:23 PM
  #8  
old man neri
Drifting
 
old man neri's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Newfoundland
Posts: 2,022
Likes: 0
Received 89 Likes on 53 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by flatsixnut
God, I can see it now...after pics of this circulate to the civic forum.

Actually, now I am really tempted to post it on the honda forum. So very tempted.
Old 08-20-2008, 09:12 PM
  #9  
ked
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
ked's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Hsv AL
Posts: 3,495
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Jack; you were on the right track, but a bit compromised... did you try going either higher up or further forward?
Attached Images   
Old 08-21-2008, 12:46 AM
  #10  
JackOlsen
Race Car
 
JackOlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,920
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

What I wasn't thinking (and that list is long, honestly) was that a wing creates a lower-pressure (and turbulent) zone below and behind it. Theoretically, this meant it was 'pulling up' on the body of the car even as it 'pushed down' on it through the support struts. In fact, at a sustained 100 mph that thing caused a huge amount of fluttering across the length of my lightweight fiberglass hood -- and actually pulled a section of the hood gasket up and out.

No improvement, based on my ride height sensors. However, all the other junk you see there that I was trying did have a repeatable and demonstrable effect.

I didn't try getting it up higher or putting it out further (and lower) in front. Both of those approaches would probably work -- but both would be at least as ugly and a lot more complicated to engineer.
Old 08-21-2008, 03:18 AM
  #11  
rnln
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
rnln's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: CA
Posts: 798
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OMG, are you turning that car into a... monster looking machine? ... In that case, why not make the low bumper lip bigger and sturdier instead of the front hood wing?
Alright, I'll give up the idea of cool air intake.

Originally Posted by JackOlsen
It compromises efficiency to make the engine suck air through a long straw. With water-cooloed cars, that trade-off can be worth it, since there is (more or less) stagnant air in the engine bay. But the blower on the 911 makes it a fundamentally different issue.

Those ducts you see on the 959 are coming from the intercoolers. Cooling intake temps on a turbo are a different game than with a normally-aspirated 911.

I'm not knocking the impulse to improve things. I tested a snorkle type intake and also a box that sectioned off intake air from the rest of the engine compartment. In my experience, neither provided any improvement.

But I can't judge anyone. After all, I'm the guy who tested a front wing.



(For the record, it was a bad idea.)
Old 08-21-2008, 12:43 PM
  #12  
MUSSBERGER
uninformed gas bag
(contemplating on whether gas bag is one or two words)
Rennlist Member
 
MUSSBERGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne Beach
Posts: 20,514
Received 171 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

At first I thought it was like the Jackalope pictures.You have earned my eternal respect by posting that picture. Not too many would have the set to do that.
Old 08-21-2008, 03:29 PM
  #13  
JackOlsen
Race Car
 
JackOlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,920
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

That was an aero test day where I went out to try everything but the kitchen sink on a remote stretch of road where I could reliably make two sustained 100 mph runs in opposite directions with my data logger measuring any changes in ride height.

Everything you see there bolts on and off and fits inside the car. By the time I was making the drive home, it looked normal again:

Old 08-21-2008, 04:00 PM
  #14  
JackOlsen
Race Car
 
JackOlsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 3,920
Received 62 Likes on 48 Posts
Default

And rmln, I did end up going with a more aggressive (and simpler) front setup:

Old 08-21-2008, 04:41 PM
  #15  
Daviboy
Advanced
 
Daviboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cape Town, South Africa
Posts: 95
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Jackolsen kudos to you gorgeous car!!!


Quick Reply: air intake mod...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:38 PM.