Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Motor rebuild at 76k on an '84. Is this normal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-30-2004, 11:10 AM
  #1  
Tom R.
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,201
Received 116 Likes on 84 Posts
Default Motor rebuild at 76k on an '84. Is this normal?

I just spoke to the original owner of an 84 im going to look at this weekend. He said compression was bad in 2 cylinders when the car had 76k.

Is this abnormal? What would it be a sign of. The good news is at least the motor is relatively fresh, as long as a decent mechanic did the rebuild.


I thought the valves went bad closer to the 100k mark.

thanks
Tom
Old 04-30-2004, 11:43 AM
  #2  
Jay H
Drifting
 
Jay H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: WI, US
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

It seems the typical mileage for valve guide wear, if this rare problem even shows up, on the 3.2 motors is in the 40,000 to 60,000 mile range. This car definitely could have had this problem at that mileage.
Old 04-30-2004, 12:15 PM
  #3  
NeverLift
Intermediate
 
NeverLift's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Santa Clara, CA.
Posts: 30
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I didn't see valve guide issues till 125K. A top end rebuild will be needed to fix valve guide issue but it is rare to has this happen under 80K usually its well over 100K. I had my top end rebuild done and put in C2 cams. My wrench say the car should be good for well over 250K! When the engine was open (142K) I couldn't believe how great the cylinders looked. Just like new. These engines are built to last minus the valve guide issue. My wrench also stated new modern valve guides will last much longer.
Old 04-30-2004, 12:20 PM
  #4  
Tom R.
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,201
Received 116 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

it was probably a top end rebuild since he said he also had the clutch done then, and paid "about six grand" for the job
Old 04-30-2004, 01:52 PM
  #5  
Doug&Julie
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Doug&Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Beave, OR
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally posted by NeverLift
...it is rare to has this happen under 80K usually its well over 100K....
Actually, in the early 3.2 motors many mechanics have found motors that were wearing their valve guides by 70k miles. It IS rare, but it has happened enough to take notice. From what I remember, most experts advise if it hasn't happened by 75k, then it probably won't happen for a long time. ..and the "fix" would last a long time as well.

That said, these ARE among the most reliable of 911 motors.

Old 04-30-2004, 02:15 PM
  #6  
Tom R.
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,201
Received 116 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

He didnt sound like he abused the car. thanks. now i just have to talk him down a bit, and get she who must be obeyed on board. not necessarily in that order.
Old 04-30-2004, 02:26 PM
  #7  
87turbo911
Rennlist Member
 
87turbo911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Then again, you could always find out how much I'd want for my 1986 911 Targa and not worry about the rebuild. It's got ~86.5K miles on it and was PPI'd at about ~86K miles by my mechanic (for my own reference). 1-2% leakdown...upgraded clutch.

But I'm not the original owner and, being that I bought it from an Exotic Used Car dealer back in May 1999, only have service records from back then...first was done by the dealer, the rest by PowerTech. The only "DIY" I've done on it was to replace a third light stoplight bulb...but only because I didn't (and still don't) want to mess up the car by me tinkering with it.

-Adrian
Old 04-30-2004, 02:59 PM
  #8  
Tom R.
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
Tom R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,201
Received 116 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

87 pm'd ya
Old 04-30-2004, 03:11 PM
  #9  
87turbo911
Rennlist Member
 
87turbo911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Northern NJ
Posts: 2,250
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Got it an responded!
Old 04-30-2004, 03:26 PM
  #10  
Jay H
Drifting
 
Jay H's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: WI, US
Posts: 3,291
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Doug&Julie
Actually, in the early 3.2 motors many mechanics have found motors that were wearing their valve guides by 70k miles. It IS rare, but it has happened enough to take notice. From what I remember, most experts advise if it hasn't happened by 75k, then it probably won't happen for a long time. ..and the "fix" would last a long time as well.

That said, these ARE among the most reliable of 911 motors.

I agree with this and it's what I remember too.
Old 04-30-2004, 04:25 PM
  #11  
g-50cab
Drifting
 
g-50cab's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: St Petersburg, FL
Posts: 2,400
Received 50 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally posted by Jay H
I agree with this and it's what I remember too.
That is what I have heard too -



Quick Reply: Motor rebuild at 76k on an '84. Is this normal?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 02:43 PM.