Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Crashing suspension normal?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-17-2019, 08:27 AM
  #1  
fueledbymetal
Racer
Thread Starter
 
fueledbymetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St Mary's City, MD
Posts: 321
Received 95 Likes on 44 Posts
Default Crashing suspension normal?

I'm in the market for a Targa and I've test driven two so far, a 77 and a 87. They both had high miles (196k & 117k) but appeared to be well maintained (both had recent extensive engine rebuilds). That said, the shocks definitely weren’t fresh so they may have been completely worn. Both cars felt fine on smooth roads but crashed hard on sharp dips where my 2018 with Sport PASM on sport+ would soak it up. So is this a shortcoming of the suspension capability, worn suspension, or a combo of both?




Old 04-17-2019, 02:19 PM
  #2  
wareaglescott
Burning Brakes
 
wareaglescott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Alabama
Posts: 1,184
Received 99 Likes on 57 Posts
Default

Comparing a 77/87 to a 2018 with Pasm probably isn’t the best anlyasis. I have a ‘79 and ‘18 myself and there is no comparison. With that being said hard to speculate on the specific cars you are driving. Best you can do is drive multiple of the same vintage and get a feel for them.
Old 04-17-2019, 02:24 PM
  #3  
r911
Anti-Cupholder League
 
r911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 3,935
Received 117 Likes on 100 Posts
Default

could be worn shocks; could be suspension bushings (which need to be replaced after 1-2 decades due to 'cold flow' no matter what the mileage)

as per above no old 911 can keep up with a new Porsche on real roads, the bumpier the road the greater the delta

OTOH, no new Porsche is as fun to drive...
Old 04-18-2019, 07:54 AM
  #4  
fueledbymetal
Racer
Thread Starter
 
fueledbymetal's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: St Mary's City, MD
Posts: 321
Received 95 Likes on 44 Posts
Default

Thanks guys! I've combed through what feels like millions of adds now and while many reference recent engine, drivetrain and possibly cosmetic maintenance, *rarely* have any mentioned suspension. I'm beginning to think this is just commonly neglected by most owners.
Old 04-18-2019, 08:33 AM
  #5  
theiceman
Team Owner
 
theiceman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Cambridge Ontario Canada
Posts: 26,675
Received 1,023 Likes on 728 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fueledbymetal
Thanks guys! I've combed through what feels like millions of adds now and while many reference recent engine, drivetrain and possibly cosmetic maintenance, *rarely* have any mentioned suspension. I'm beginning to think this is just commonly neglected by most owners.
I Dont agree
Coming on here and saying 30-40 year old cars don't handle as well as your 1 year old appliance is pretty close to trolling.
Old 04-18-2019, 04:23 PM
  #6  
dr914
Burning Brakes
 
dr914's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 912
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 37 Posts
Default

you are totally spoiled. These are both barbaric cars as compared to yours. Do not even consider the 77 when you can buy an 87, though. I always tell the story of finding a low mile 87 cab after having a new one years ago, Was so excited, getting the car ready, and finally I had a cab I could keep. After servicing here at our shop I was ready to drive it home! After six miles of driving, I could not deal with it any more. Pulling over to the side of the road, I called our service manager at home and asked him "Sean what is wrong with this car?" His answer............. " Nothing is wrong with the car there is something wrong with you". It suddenly dawned on me, I had been driving a newer Boxster every day. The new 911s and caymans and boosters are far superior in every way to the old stuff. Great to collect and look at, bad to drive
Old 04-19-2019, 01:48 PM
  #7  
TerrySmith
Instructor
 
TerrySmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 108
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 1 Post
Default

My data point is at 157 k miles with turbo tie rods, proper alignment and tires but otherwise original, stockl suspension, that my '88 911 cab handles superbly and yet is also more compliant and forgiving of bad roads, as compared to my 987.2 S Cayman that I had already owned for 3 years prior to the owning the '88 911. The Cayman is faster and easier to drive near the limit butI have to keep the PASM in soft mode most of the time to keep from having a jarring ride. The '88 is more fun to drive except maybe on freeways.

I don't understand what is meant by "crashing" - I have to take sharp dips slowly and at an angle in all of my cars to prevent crashing the front splitter / air dam onto the road.



Quick Reply: Crashing suspension normal?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:21 PM.