When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
I'd like to point out some observations as a early '74 911 Coupe owner that I find curious and points to the unusual "contradictions" in air cooled 911 perceptions.
For a very long time, the "middies" were a much maligned model in the 911 timeline. While some of the observations are indeed justified, there are some things I find very odd when people discuss it's weak points, weak points that are shared in other more lauded variations of the air cooled 911's.
Typically the first weak point mentioned are the head studs. And while it is true that the middies suffered from this, it seems in my research that it seemed to happen more to the '76-'77's due to the excessive heat from the smog solutions that Porsche implemented. There are of course '74 and '75's that have had broken/pulled studs, but just about all middie's have had their head studs addressed at this stage today. SC's have had their share of stud issues as well, but they seemed to have gotten more of a pass on this malady then the middies, albeit the examples of this happening on SC's seem to be on smaller scale. I have spoken to some reputable Porsche specialists that have seen head stud failure, albeit very few, on 3.2's. So it isn't like the stud issue was confined to the just the middie's.
One of the contributing factors to the middie stud issues was the fact that they had magnesium cases. While my car had a complete top to bottom rebuild done by Dave at TRE just a few years ago, I still get leaks. Dave has written an article on his website about how it is not uncommon for freshly rebuilt mag motors to still end up having leaks soon after. This has been a malady pointed out by some who condemn the middie's compared to others, but the '69-'73 long hoods also had mag cases and had their share of leaks. I read Magnus Walker's biography that he wrote earlier this year and he talked about how his long hoods, especially 277, leaked like sieves. But the long hoods don't suffer in reputation largely due to their values now and they don't get driven as much anymore by their owners because of said increased values. Same case material as the middie's, but the perception is not the same. Just one of those things until one day, should the middie's rise in price dramatically one day, the middie perception will change and it will be considered a "quirk".
Chain tensioners are another issue, but of course SC's have had the same malady. No biggie, swap them out for the Carrera's and good to go.
Pre-galvenized bodies are only an issue in inclimate weather conditions. Again, this has never stopped someone from buying pre-middie's.
CIS system. Again, the SC's had them. As long as your tech that you use understands the system, they are actually quite solid.
As a early '74 owner, I will be the first to admit that this thread is biased and self serving, but I have tried to remain as objective as possible. The '74 and '75's are the most desirable of the middie's since smogging is not an issue, and as a result these have been used as hot rods. This has greatly contributed to the lack of original, good condition examples from those years. The middie's had the shortest productions runs among the air cooled 911's along with the SWB's and had similar production run numbers per annum as any long hood (I think). I have no empirical evidence of this, but I suspect that there far fewer original, numbers matching, solid examples of '74's and '75's out there than even long hoods. Certainly less than SC's and Carrera's, as they were produced in far greater numbers and are easier to find.
I have driven my share of long hoods, and the '74's in particular retain that light nimble feel that the long hoods posses, only with more power. They feel lighter than the SC's, as they don't have the smog equipment and added weight. Aesthetically, the '74's have the smaller bumperette's and look closer to what came before it than what came after. My car is actually a ROW car in that it does not have the impact struts in the bumpers, so there is a weight savings in addition to mine having no AC, no sunroof and no stereo.
Will the pre smog middie's rise to the heights of the long hoods and SWB's in the minds of Porsche-philes? Some will say that's doubtful, and who knows. They certainly aren't the ones mentioned by some who are asked "which one to buy" at this moment, as the SC's and Carrera's are usually talked about as the "next mover". But if you consider the points I have mentioned, a case can be made that the early middie's are worth considering, especially the '74's as they are unique in relation to their brethren.
Just my less than 2 cents and I'm sure I will have my comments have holes shot through them by others, so have at it.
Sounds like a bit of a defensive rant actually. Not sure why you came in here in such a defensive position but I will comment on a few of the things you have said
The reason the middie gets a bad rap is because it tends to have all the collective failures of the other cars
Studs AND leaking AND corrosion AND mag case
But enough of that as I don’t want to start a war, we are brothers in arms but just wanted to say you cherry picked your arguments.
The biggest detractor to the middie is the studs/ case issue . Not all stud issues are created equal sc / Carrera studs are a simple breakage problem, a decent home mechanic can replace them easily with the right knowledge
Middie studs “pull†which is an altogether different issue which means case repair and possibly even line boring. This can be an an expensive proposition which until the recent climb in prices of the cars made it untenable for most.
I would buy a middie. But I would make sure there was documentation of case repair, and my ppi would include taking it To have the body thoroughly checked for rust. The rest I wouldn’t sweat.
But if you consider the points I have mentioned, a case can be made that the early middie's are worth considering, especially the '74's as they are unique in relation to their brethren.
Plurals are never written with an apostrophe, other than that you're 100% correct.
Middies have already come a long way though, most people have realized what a lovely little engine the 2.7 is and how classy and understated the narrow body is and how beautiful the chrome trim. You hear fewer and fewer people crapping on them, and when you do it's usually the same people who crap on the 996 headlights and who say turbo engines are rubbish.
Imagine owning a near RSR spec cabriolet. I get zh!t all the time on here. Even my local friends gave me a hard time until I took them for a drive.....then it's OMFG!!!!!!!
IF I had it to do over I'd put my 3,2L and every other go-fast bolt on in my car into a '74 and die a happy man.
Plurals are never written with an apostrophe, other than that you're 100% correct.
Middies have already come a long way though, most people have realized what a lovely little engine the 2.7 is and how classy and understated the narrow body is and how beautiful the chrome trim. You hear fewer and fewer people crapping on them, and when you do it's usually the same people who crap on the 996 headlights and who say turbo engines are rubbish.
Well you have to admit .,, those 996 headlights are kinda crappy 😉
Well you have to admit .,, those 996 headlights are kinda crappy 😉
I don't think they are... Different, yes, and a break with tradition, but in my view they have aged incredibly well, like the rest of the car. I think the 996 design was so controversial because it was 15 years ahead of its time.
12-02-2017, 03:22 PM
The case for the early Middies-'74 & '75's
