Notices
718 GTS 4.0/GT4/GT4RS/Spyder/25th Anniversary Discussions about the 718 version of the GT4RS, GTS 4.0, GT4, Spyder and 25th Anniversary Boxster
Sponsored By:
Sponsored By: Cobb

Any dyno tests of OAP/GPF delete alone?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-22-2021 | 02:15 PM
  #1  
Tief Lernen's Avatar
Tief Lernen
Thread Starter
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2016
Posts: 375
Likes: 323
Default Any dyno tests of OAP/GPF delete alone?

Is there a definitive answer on what kind of torque curve changes we can expect to see with a GPF delete OAP alone (keeping the factory headers, muffler, etc.)?

Plenty of people report the car "feels" more powerful, but it's pretty well-known that loudness can affect your perception of power. I saw a dyno test in another thread where someone had removed the filter element from the factory OAP (leaving a big empty cavity in the pipe) and actually measured lower torque values below 5000 RPM or so.

Has anyone actually done a before/after dyno test with just an aftermarket OAP, e.g. Akra, Soul, etc.?

The following 2 users liked this post by Tief Lernen:
KBS911 (01-22-2021), porscheflat6 (02-22-2021)

Popular Reply

01-22-2021, 06:33 PM
Joe@Fabspeed's Avatar
Joe@Fabspeed
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 730
Likes: 43
From: 155 Commerce Drive | Fort Washington, PA 19034
Default

HI Everyone
I am the president of Fabspeed Motorsport and I picked up a 718 GT4 way back in April 2020 for long term system development and I'm also a Porsche nut like you guys and 30 year PCA member.
Removing the GPF left and right pipes saves significant weight and adds about 5 ponies. There are no significant dyno proven gains BUT she sounds alot better and pops snarls on over-run when you jump off the throttle.

We tried multiple dimensions of exhaust tubing and different collectors and the final design made the most bang for the buck. If you do a full Fabspeed system we have recorded 35+HP and she runs and runs. Feel free to cruise by FABSPEED Motorsport weather permitting you can test out my car and see how its made. Everything is made 100% inhouse.




__________________
Fabspeed Motorsport USA
155 Commerce Drive
Fort Washington, PA. 19034
www.Fabspeed.com

P: 215-646-4945
F: 215-646-9828

Exotic Car Performance Experts
Porsche, Ferrari, Lamborghini, McLaren, Maserati, Bentley, Aston Martin, BMW, Audi and Jaguar.

31 year PCA Club member supporter
14 year Ferrari Club member
1st ever financial supporter of Porsche Fans/ Rennlist
Old 01-22-2021 | 02:26 PM
  #2  
Jeff Jones's Avatar
Jeff Jones
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: May 2014
Posts: 1,565
Likes: 1,762
From: Seattle
Default

I would love to be proven wrong, but without an ecu tune, I don't see power increases being a big factor in aftermarket exhaust decisions. I'm always skeptical of reported power gains and would love to see Dyno results taken immediately following the upgrade and then a few months later. I would let sound and weight be the determining factors until we get an ecu tuning option that can take advantage of the free flowing exhaust.

Caveat - this is from my experience with modern 911s so again, happy to be wrong on the 718 GT4/Spyder platform.
Old 01-22-2021 | 04:04 PM
  #3  
lovetoturn's Avatar
lovetoturn
Three Wheelin'
 
Joined: Mar 2017
Posts: 1,368
Likes: 1,210
From: Dallas
Default

JCR did so a while back.
Old 01-22-2021 | 04:16 PM
  #4  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Likes: 3,886
Default

The prior thread done by a Rennlister is about as good as it gets in terms of a comparison. He did immediate before and after dyno runs on the same dyno with the filter in and then with it removed. And he showed zero gains. And he had no axe to grind either way.

There's no way a different pipe in the same place covering the same ground is going to make much of any difference. I wouldn't accept anything a tuner puts out without someone independently verifying it similar to what that gentleman did.
The following users liked this post:
Z06jerry (01-23-2021)
Old 01-22-2021 | 04:31 PM
  #5  
Christmas50's Avatar
Christmas50
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 477
Likes: 89
Default

As far as I remember he actually had a loss of few HP. Or maybe that was the one who gutted stock one

Last edited by Christmas50; 01-22-2021 at 04:34 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Z06jerry (01-23-2021)
Old 01-22-2021 | 04:52 PM
  #6  
Larry Cable's Avatar
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 25,836
Likes: 3,642
From: S.F Bay Area
Default

Originally Posted by Christmas50
As far as I remember he actually had a loss of few HP. Or maybe that was the one who gutted stock one
reduced back pressure... might need some time for the ECU to relearn, if in fact that is something that it is able to dynamically account for...
Old 01-22-2021 | 04:55 PM
  #7  
Christmas50's Avatar
Christmas50
Racer
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 477
Likes: 89
Default

Originally Posted by Larry Cable
reduced back pressure... might need some time for the ECU to relearn, if in fact that is something that it is able to dynamically account for...
Could be
Old 01-22-2021 | 05:01 PM
  #8  
KBS911's Avatar
KBS911
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,950
Likes: 134
Default

Originally Posted by Tief Lernen
Is there a definitive answer on what kind of torque curve changes we can expect to see with a GPF delete OAP alone (keeping the factory headers, muffler, etc.)?

Plenty of people report the car "feels" more powerful, but it's pretty well-known that loudness can affect your perception of power. I saw a dyno test in another thread where someone had removed the filter element from the factory OAP (leaving a big empty cavity in the pipe) and actually measured lower torque values below 5000 RPM or so.

Has anyone actually done a before/after dyno test with just an aftermarket OAP, e.g. Akra, Soul, etc.?
Great question! Like playing cards in the spokes of your bicycle when you were a kid.......of course you were faster!
It would be great for a vendor/manufacturer to post iterative examples of torque and power gains and/or losses associated with:
1. Just an OAP replacement pipe.
2. Just a rear muffler.
3. Just headers.
Old 01-22-2021 | 05:20 PM
  #9  
Jim Rockford's Avatar
Jim Rockford
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 801
Likes: 493
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
There's no way a different pipe in the same place covering the same ground is going to make much of any difference.
If pipe A and pipe B are both straight through but with different bends or similar then yes, but in this case the delete pipe is just that, a pipe, and the original is a pipe with a massive obstruction in it. Maybe the cat is snuffing out all the velocity upstream and another flow restricting item down the chain doesn't matter at that point?

I'm admittedly not an exhaust engineer, but on the surface it seems difficult to think that removing the OPF matrix isn't going to have some measurable performance gains.
The following users liked this post:
rwm (07-04-2022)
Old 01-22-2021 | 05:54 PM
  #10  
ronbauer's Avatar
ronbauer
Pro
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 592
Likes: 524
From: Seattle, WA
Default

Originally Posted by Jim Rockford
If pipe A and pipe B are both straight through but with different bends or similar then yes, but in this case the delete pipe is just that, a pipe, and the original is a pipe with a massive obstruction in it. Maybe the cat is snuffing out all the velocity upstream and another flow restricting item down the chain doesn't matter at that point?

I'm admittedly not an exhaust engineer, but on the surface it seems difficult to think that removing the OPF matrix isn't going to have some measurable performance gains.
This.

Ron
Old 01-22-2021 | 06:14 PM
  #11  
Purekoryo's Avatar
Purekoryo
Rennlist Member
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 632
Likes: 166
Default

I’m guessing the area of the void of the OPF is probably the same as the area of the pipe connected to it; thus, no increase in flow rate, no power. Although you probably have turbulence.

Also, when I had my 991.2 GTS, I felt I lost some power with headers but after 100 miles or so, I gained power up top. With Sport cats I also felt more power after a few more miles. So the ecu does need to adapt.
Old 01-22-2021 | 06:24 PM
  #12  
Archimedes's Avatar
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 13,162
Likes: 3,886
Default

Only way to tell if there are real power gains is for independent before and after runs to be performed on the same car, same dyno, same day. The only thing we know for sure at this point is that gutting the OEM OPF nets you nothing, and maybe costs you a few ft. lbs. or torque. All the rest is speculation and I wouldn't buy anything a manufacturer said that hasn't been independently verified. And the most inaccurate measure of all is the butt dyno.
The following users liked this post:
Z06jerry (01-23-2021)
Old 01-22-2021 | 06:32 PM
  #13  
Jim Rockford's Avatar
Jim Rockford
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 801
Likes: 493
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Archimedes
Only way to tell if there are real power gains is for independent before and after runs to be performed on the same car, same dyno, same day. The only thing we know for sure at this point is that gutting the OEM OPF nets you nothing, and maybe costs you a few ft. lbs. or torque. All the rest is speculation and I wouldn't buy anything a manufacturer said that hasn't been independently verified. And the most inaccurate measure of all is the butt dyno.
Agree on all counts above based on initial findings... but how much does what Larry Cable said factor in, being: "might need some time for the ECU to relearn, if in fact that is something that it is able to dynamically account for...". Or if the current onboard software can't grapple with, then what a 3rd party tune might bring to the table in synergy with this hardware change? Different levels of owner commitment would factor in of course as perhaps someone who wants to keep stock mapping may in fact never get any appreciable gain out of the hardware change, but could it be that someone who wants to maximize their tune with an outside contribution may get a desirable gain from swapping out the GPF section?
Old 01-22-2021 | 06:33 PM
  #14  
Joe@Fabspeed's Avatar
Joe@Fabspeed
Addict
Rennlist Member

Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 730
Likes: 43
From: 155 Commerce Drive | Fort Washington, PA 19034
Default

HI Everyone
I am the president of Fabspeed Motorsport and I picked up a 718 GT4 way back in April 2020 for long term system development and I'm also a Porsche nut like you guys and 30 year PCA member.
Removing the GPF left and right pipes saves significant weight and adds about 5 ponies. There are no significant dyno proven gains BUT she sounds alot better and pops snarls on over-run when you jump off the throttle.

We tried multiple dimensions of exhaust tubing and different collectors and the final design made the most bang for the buck. If you do a full Fabspeed system we have recorded 35+HP and she runs and runs. Feel free to cruise by FABSPEED Motorsport weather permitting you can test out my car and see how its made. Everything is made 100% inhouse.




The following 11 users liked this post by Joe@Fabspeed:
0-Day (01-22-2021), Alpha Ice (03-16-2021), Fabspeed Motorsport (01-22-2021), Frank Torres (02-19-2021), Jim Rockford (01-22-2021), JP4931 (01-22-2021), jwr9152 (01-22-2021), KBS911 (01-23-2021), Mousejunior (01-27-2021), rekka (11-19-2023), rwm (10-07-2023) and 6 others liked this post. (Show less...)
Old 01-22-2021 | 06:37 PM
  #15  
Jim Rockford's Avatar
Jim Rockford
Burning Brakes
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 801
Likes: 493
From: Ontario
Default

Originally Posted by Joe@Fabspeed
Feel free to cruise by FABSPEED Motorsport weather permitting you can test out my car...
Well that's a pretty honest offer. The geography doesn't really permit me but cheers to that kind of transparency


Quick Reply: Any dyno tests of OAP/GPF delete alone?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:14 AM.