Notices
997 Turbo Forum 2005-2012
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

TPC's DSC box and new Active suspention

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-31-2015, 07:27 PM
  #16  
cgfen
Rennlist Member
 
cgfen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Vista CA
Posts: 7,740
Received 886 Likes on 584 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom-TPC Racing
Thank you for your feedback.

One element in particular is mechanical hysteresis of stock PASM shocks as a result of the electro-mechanical mechanism's reaction time AND stiction.
ahhhhh

hysteresis
stiction

technical jargon is music to my auricles (external ears)

Thanks for posting.

Craig
Old 09-01-2015, 02:42 AM
  #17  
golfnutintib
Rennlist Member
 
golfnutintib's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: ..............
Posts: 3,859
Likes: 0
Received 44 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom-TPC Racing
Thank you for your feedback.

I agree, DSC by itself doesn't work magic for the entire chassis- DSC module is only one component of the entire suspension system. Even though DSC itself has huge potential for shock damping control and makes immediate improvement, the vehicles performance is ultimately limited by mechanical components(i.e. stock shocks, springs, setup, even tires). One element in particular is mechanical hysteresis of stock PASM shocks as a result of the electro-mechanical mechanism's reaction time AND stiction. The difference alone in the reaction time between 6ms to 100ms at 60mph is ~8.5 inches* of distance travelled. As a side note, believe it or not, some of the popular brand conventional(non-electronic) racing shocks have hysteresis as well especially when the dampening force is dialed up. In any case, the hysteresis can be masked(to make the chassis respond better) by setup changes such as sway bars, spring rates, differential, geometry. Race teams have been "masking" damper stiction with setup for a very long time as tires got better. In recent years ultra high end motorsport shocks have reduced stiction to a whole new level. Tractive is able to provide low stiction feature at a reasonable cost.

Anyway, it has been my experience that majority of DSC users just plug and play, which is perfectly fine for street and light track use, whereas pretty much anyone who buys a set of any brand coilovers changes ride height and gets more aggressive alignment, and very likely other suspension component upgrade at the same time to improve the chassis as a whole.

Back to the topic of the stock PASM shocks, which at lower ride height levels the bump rubbers affect reaction time too. As far as the shock itself, the reaction time is based on the piston differential pressure and load. The DSC software anticipates the stock PASM shock's reaction. Our Engineer is offering a limited number of pre-user version of DSC software(basically Engineering version) if you want to tune your chassis for variables. Let me know if you want to tune your stock PASM shocks. We have advanced level track drivers and chief instructor in our local region running amazing times with DSC controlled Bilstein B16's and shock PASM shocks, with full setup of course.
tom

thanks for ur reply

i may call u over the next few days to discuss in person - not sure i am following what you mean by 'tuning' my stock pasm shocks - sorry i am not very technically astute

but here, for the rl board, maybe can you clarify -- for a 7.1 gt3 application... what would be the most cost effective hardware (shocks and springs) that you feel would couple with your dsc controller/accelerometer to provide very good responsiveness for track applications? should the soft stock springs be replaced in this case? we all know that is weakness #1 for track bound 7.1 gt3's...

i assume that b16 damptronics or tractive gear would be the optimum solution, based on your comments above?
Old 09-01-2015, 05:31 AM
  #18  
nzskater
Rennlist Member
 
nzskater's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Japan 🇯🇵
Posts: 2,877
Received 173 Likes on 113 Posts
Default TPC's DSC box and new Active suspention

Interesting details. Assuming lowering springs installed, are the reaction times of the B8's any better than stock PASM shocks?
Old 09-01-2015, 09:47 AM
  #19  
Tom@TPC Racing
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,424
Received 971 Likes on 535 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cgfen
ahhhhh

hysteresis
stiction

technical jargon is music to my auricles (external ears)

Thanks for posting.

Craig
With pleasure, Sir.
__________________
PCA National Instructor

TPC Racing stats:
2023 Porsche Sprint Challenge 992 Cup Am Champion
2023 Porsche Sprint Challenge GT4 Pro-Am Team Champion
2022 Porsche Sprint Challenge 992 Cup & 991 Cup Champion
2020 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge 2nd Championship
2018 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge 2nd Championship
2016 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge Champion
2013 IMSA GT3 Cup Challenge Champion
2006 Rolex-24 @ Daytona GT Champion
2004 Grand-Am SGS Class Champion





















Old 09-01-2015, 09:51 AM
  #20  
Tom@TPC Racing
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,424
Received 971 Likes on 535 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nzskater
Interesting details. Assuming lowering springs installed, are the reaction times of the B8's any better than stock PASM shocks?
The B8's are designed to be lowered to some degree so I'd say minimum affect if any at reasonable ride height. However, the vehicle(not the shocks) should respond better(and "feel" better) when cornering as a result of the increased negative camber from lowering and lower center of gravity.
Old 09-01-2015, 10:30 AM
  #21  
Tom@TPC Racing
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,424
Received 971 Likes on 535 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by golfnutintib
thanks for ur reply
Welcome.


Originally Posted by golfnutintib
not sure i am following what you mean by 'tuning' my stock pasm shocks - sorry i am not very technically astute
No worries. In case you haven't seen this DSC software tutorial video, here it is- https://rennlist.com/forums/997-gt2-...on-thread.html
Basically DSC/Race Car Engineer, Michael Levitas, will work directly with you, if you want, to improve the anticipation of the delay in reaction you are feeling via software be it shock related or chassis setup related.


Originally Posted by golfnutintib
but here, for the rl board, maybe can you clarify -- for a 7.1 gt3 application... what would be the most cost effective hardware (shocks and springs) that you feel would couple with your dsc controller/accelerometer to provide very good responsiveness for track applications? should the soft stock springs be replaced in this case? we all know that is weakness #1 for track bound 7.1 gt3's...
Most cost effective would be to work with your stock PASM shocks, as long as they are in good working condition. Is the delay in reaction you are feeling on entry or exit or both? Tell us more about your setup so we can help- we know the springs are stock, what sway bars and the setting, alignment, ride height, diff setup. All these items influence chassis reaction. I understand not everyone refer to share these info, email me directly is fine. Email is: tchan@tpcracing.com


Originally Posted by golfnutintib
i assume that b16 damptronics or tractive gear would be the optimum solution, based on your comments above?
As far as shocks themselves go, Tractive DDA is the optimum pairing for DSC for its ultra wide dynamic damping range, fast electronic to mechanical reaction time, low stiction, and superior build quality. B16 on ebay cost half of Tractive DDA, but B16 doesn't include front and rear ball bearing top plates and more ideal springs for advanced track use so by the time these items are added its not as appealing cost wise. But B16 is a very good product for replacement of the worn stock shocks without doing the add ons.
Old 09-19-2015, 07:09 PM
  #22  
MagicCity911
Intermediate
 
MagicCity911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tom,

How does the module work with the B16 units? Is there different software for them? I see there are two different part numbers for the B16 PASM units. One is a "comfort" and the other is a "sport" version. Which one do you recommend for a 90% street /10% track car? How is the reaction time for these units compared to stock?
Old 09-21-2015, 12:52 PM
  #23  
Tom@TPC Racing
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,424
Received 971 Likes on 535 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MagicCity911
Tom,

How does the module work with the B16 units?
DSC works great with B16. I've had DSC and B16 on my car and liked it a lot. Many DSC users have B16 and they too like it a lot. As discussed previously in few other threads, the B16 electro-mechanical mechanism is pretty much the same as OEM PASM which is also made by Bilstein. B16 comes with stiffer springs than stock so the "compounding stiffness" of the stiffer springs paired with the damping commands of DSC is most welcomed on track and other high-g situations. Many users such as myself have further increased the compounding stiffness to favor track use by replacing B16 springs with stiffer springs and stiffer adjustable sway bars. Note: Compounding stiffness is good up the point where grip/feel is at peak.


Originally Posted by MagicCity911
How is the reaction time for these units compared to stock?
Reaction time is the same as stock, in the 100ms range, but usually when putting a set of B16 or B8 on the car feels better even without DSC simply due to the fact that aging stock shocks were replaced.


Originally Posted by MagicCity911
Is there different software for them?
No. Stock PASM and B16 have same reaction time so no change in that regard. The compounding stiffness is well within the range of standard DSC mapping even will stiffer springs and bars.


Originally Posted by MagicCity911
I see there are two different part numbers for the B16 PASM units. One is a "comfort" and the other is a "sport" version. Which one do you recommend for a 90% street /10% track car?
In my opinion, from my very narrow-minded performance perspective, the comfort version is BS. Maybe I'm too hardcore but who buys coilovers for comfort? Personally, for comfort I'd use stock shocks or B8 paired with .2 springs or GTS-4 Sport PASM lowering springs as they are "bell-shaped" with unevenly wound coils that are by design, more stable to the oscillation frequencies of street use. As for recommendation, I am afraid I am not in a position to make one for you. You have to ask yourself do you want the car to favor the 10% of the times that are on track or favor the 90% of the times on street? Only you can answer that. With DSC technology the gap between performance and comfort is closer than ever before, to the point which for some people the compromise between track performance to street comfort is zero. We have proven that DSC, B8, and bell-shaped springs to run incredible lap times for a given tire, but we always want more so we partnered with Tractive to narrow the gap even further.
Old 09-21-2015, 12:59 PM
  #24  
TT Surgeon
Race Director
 
TT Surgeon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: KC ex pat marooned in NY
Posts: 13,005
Likes: 0
Received 17 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Curious about the b8 bell spring combo, would those springs work on a turbo?
C
Old 09-21-2015, 01:59 PM
  #25  
Tom@TPC Racing
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,424
Received 971 Likes on 535 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TT Surgeon
Curious about the b8 bell spring combo, would those springs work on a turbo?
C
Absolutely. B8 is a direct bolt-in replacement as well as other bell-shaped springs that matches the dimension of the stock bell-shaped springs.

B8 Sport Damptronic is an upgrade over .1 and .2 turbo PASM shocks. You will notice the ride is firmer but no harsher. Best words I can come up with is sportier controlled tightness. Some of the sportier feel is attributed to the inverted strut cartridge design(like GT2/3/RS) that's also designed to handle higher load and reduce stiction when subjected to heavy load. The B8 stroke is designed to play well with lowering springs within a reasonable lowering height. Just realized I'm doing Bilstein's marketing work for them... LOL.

http://cart.bilsteinus.com/search/mm.../drivetype=AWD

Eibach Pro Kit lowering springs is a bell-shaped spring and used to be my favorite for this car. They lower the car just enough, not too much that the car is riding on bump rubbers- Good. They are progressive rate that I estimate to be ~15% over stock- Good. They feel like floating on a cloud over street 1/2-inch bumps- Freakin Awesome. They were on top of my list for lowering springs for this bar ...But it has been my personal experience that after few years these springs sag to make the car lower than I like. So they are great for the first few years. All springs sag, some more than other, some sooner than others. I started liking stock springs because they seem to have better manufacturing requirement against sagging. For example, I have recently steered many 987 Cayman/Boxster customer who are looking to lower their car on stock shocks to Cayman R springs that're 20mm lower. In this case, Carrera GTS-4 Sport PASM springs that're 20mm lower.
Old 09-21-2015, 04:52 PM
  #26  
wheeler
Rennlist Member
 
wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: KC Area
Posts: 594
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

I'll chime in as a VERY satisfied street user! My 2009 C2S is lowered on H&R sport springs, stock PASM, using the DSC box. In complete layman terms, normal aggressive street driving, the car is now essentially flat in every direction. No squat under hard acceleration, no dive under hard braking, compared to stock it's FLAT through corners. For all the stupid interior carbon fiber crap and leather door sills guys buy for their cars, this is a no brainer for the cost, your car is instantly better with it.
Old 09-23-2015, 11:48 PM
  #27  
MagicCity911
Intermediate
 
MagicCity911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Tom, the springs you mentioned from the GTS, would those work on my 07 Turbo? If so would you happen to have the part numbers for those? I really appreciate all of your input and knowledge.
Old 09-24-2015, 11:22 AM
  #28  
Tom@TPC Racing
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,424
Received 971 Likes on 535 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Tom-TPC Racing
I started liking stock springs because they seem to have better manufacturing requirement against sagging. For example, I have recently steered many 987 Cayman/Boxster customer who are looking to lower their car on stock shocks to Cayman R springs that're 20mm lower. In this case, Carrera GTS-4 Sport PASM springs that're 20mm lower.
I wanted to clarify that I like stock bell-shaped Sport(M030, I030 option code) springs for use on mostly street driven cars with stock type struts/shocks for its superiority over bumps, mild lowering of ~20mm, and less sag than the non-factory bell-shaped springs that I've come across.
A note on sag(aka settlement), its a common thing, usually not a big deal especially if its on threaded body coilover that can restored the original/desired ride height. I dislike having to change the suspension geometry more than I feel its necessary in order to do get wheel alignment to specs when there's no adjustment to restore height. If the car is never to be on a track then its no big deal. I only steer customers to use stock Sport springs only if they are looking for mild lowering on stock type struts/shocks because that's what I'd use in such application. I don't even sell stock springs.

For flat out track performance, the "straight" springs are the way to go. With our DSC/Tractive DDA program, we are getting straight springs to have street compliance near that of bell-shaped springs.

Here's the photo of the springs. Bell-shaped spring on the left. Straight spring on the right.

Old 09-24-2015, 11:54 AM
  #29  
Tom@TPC Racing
Premium Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Tom@TPC Racing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Jessup, MD
Posts: 3,424
Received 971 Likes on 535 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MagicCity911
Tom, the springs you mentioned from the GTS, would those work on my 07 Turbo? If so would you happen to have the part numbers for those? I really appreciate all of your input and knowledge.
The springs are interchangeable. I don't have part #'s. You'll find it in PET for 997.2 Carrera 4 GTS(I019 code) , "Coupe only" with "Sport Chassis"(I030 code) option. Its not the springs for I475 code because I475 is regular PASM, not Sport PASM, and I475 is for cabriolet and targa. I030 code is Sport PASM coupe only, which leads me to believe its the sportiest riding spring in the factory catalog with 20mm lowering. The I030 code even has different bump rubbers for front & rear for the lower height. The .1 & .2 turbo springs are same for coupe and cabriolet which is why it can be a bit bouncy over bumps without the use of DSC to dampen the oscillation. The I030(Sport Chassis PASM, Coupe only) springs with DSC is as sporty as I'd like on a mostly street driven car on stock type struts/shocks.

I think there's also an optional front spring mounting pad listed in PET that lowers the front ride height additional 3.5mm.

Last edited by Tom@TPC Racing; 09-24-2015 at 11:57 AM. Reason: typo
Old 09-24-2015, 11:33 PM
  #30  
MagicCity911
Intermediate
 
MagicCity911's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Thank you Tom once again. I will do my due diligence to find the part numbers.


Quick Reply: TPC's DSC box and new Active suspention



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:35 PM.