Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

RWD Conversion @ the Track

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-21-2016, 09:07 PM
  #16  
Jeff_DML
Instructor
 
Jeff_DML's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: San Diego
Posts: 166
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

nice build.

Last edited by Jeff_DML; 07-22-2016 at 11:33 AM. Reason: Off topic
Old 07-21-2016, 10:38 PM
  #17  
juanbenae
Instructor
 
juanbenae's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: mumbai west, silicon valley ca
Posts: 174
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

does the C4 &/or the C4S have the mezger motor?
Old 07-22-2016, 12:02 AM
  #18  
vandersmith
Pro
Thread Starter
 
vandersmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 611
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Getting this thread back on track.

I'm heading to the Ridge tomorrow. Dropped the driveshaft to test out RWD. Didn't have enough time to also get a corner balance so I'm going to leave the axles/diff in as 70-100lbs is enough to offset the current suspension settings (GT3ish).

The car is noticeably faster. After a long drive the LWFW/LSD are really doing their jobs.

Will report back with results from the track.


Last edited by vandersmith; 07-22-2016 at 04:31 AM.
Old 07-22-2016, 04:55 PM
  #19  
vandersmith
Pro
Thread Starter
 
vandersmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 611
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Middle of the day at the Ridge.

Brought my fastest lap time here down slightly on a cold lap first session out. That was on my second lap of the day on cold tires. Shocked.

My average with AWD was 1:57-58. I'm pulling 1:56-57 today while making a lot of adjustments and line changes.

The car is over steering some, need to be a little more alert on throttle on corner exit. LSD is working. Car is easy with PSM which will kick in often and ludicrous when Off.

Time to get back out there and clean up my lines!
Old 07-22-2016, 05:53 PM
  #20  
white out
Three Wheelin'
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

That's great to hear!
Old 07-23-2016, 01:13 AM
  #21  
vandersmith
Pro
Thread Starter
 
vandersmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 611
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Well f*ck a duck.

Same suspension.
Same alignment (GT3 specs).
Same sway bar settings (middle on F/R of H&Rs)
Same brakes.
Same driver.
Same track conditions as many other days I've been there. 8 events this year.

Personal Times:
AWD Best at the Ridge: 1:56:35 (June)
I can say its taken a whole season but I can now drive the crap out of the car with the AWD system. This is about the best I can do with that configuration.

RWD: Morning, Cold Track, Cold Tires: 1:56:50 (Today)
This was insane. It was 2nd lap of today. 9am. Cold. Windy. Bad tire pressures. You name it.

RWD: Afternoon, Hot Track: 1:54:30 (Today)
40+ laps today. Most under 1:57 on a poorly setup RWD car and I pull out my best yet.

It took multiple events over the past few seasons to break 2:00. Even longer and some add'l parts to get down to 1:58s.

30 minutes.
Drive shaft out.
40 laps on a bad setup.
2 seconds faster.

Still have 70 lbs of crap to remove.
Unreal.

Last edited by vandersmith; 07-23-2016 at 05:11 AM.
Old 07-23-2016, 07:17 AM
  #22  
Fishey
Nordschleife Master
 
Fishey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 5,801
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

The differences in lap time on Awd and Rwd usually play into Rwds favor until around 500whp then it gets close after 600whp there is no comparison the extra traction provided by awd makes for a faster lap time.


I should note this is on a near stock aero level or less then 700lbs of overall downforce. I have not run comparisons at high levels of aero (talking 1,500lbs+ of downforce type levels)
Old 07-23-2016, 09:32 AM
  #23  
jumper5836
Nordschleife Master
 
jumper5836's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: great white north
Posts: 8,531
Received 70 Likes on 47 Posts
Default

Doesn't make much sense to me, the C4S only sends 5% power to the front wheels, it doesn't have enough power to over drive the rears to heat up the viscous coupling to send more power to them.

I would suspect it more setup and driver favoring a different type of driving style and LSD vs PSM.
Old 07-23-2016, 01:10 PM
  #24  
vandersmith
Pro
Thread Starter
 
vandersmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 611
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jumper5836
Doesn't make much sense to me, the C4S only sends 5% power to the front wheels, it doesn't have enough power to over drive the rears to heat up the viscous coupling to send more power to them.

I would suspect it more setup and driver favoring a different type of driving style and LSD vs PSM.
After hitting the dyno last week, I can tell you after 80 mph the system is absolutely diverting more than 5%. Mistakenly we didn't lock the rollers on the first pull - my rears were topping out 4th at around 110 while my fronts were doing about 20mph. Ya, I know how stupid that was.

On the track it feels similar to the above: Less intrusive in low speed and more diversion at high speed. PSM also makes it much more predictable - strangely I couldn't turn the PSM off with the AWD system as the PSM would kick in at the worst possible times under power in corners. The LSD would be keeping the rears gripping and the PSM would brake the inside wheel, nearly spun a few times in the worst spots to do so.

With the RWD, PSM can be run on or off. Off allows the car to get completely sideways. On provides direct feedback to when turn in was too early/late or when too much throttle is applied for the current steering angle.

My theory is that I learning the line this season with the aid of the AWD system really helped me improve at a steady pace. My fastest AWD laps are clean, uneventful and easier in repetition. The RWD setup allowed me to take advantage of that experience, apply a little more power which led to carrying more speed in and out in a few critical momentum corners. The straights look to be about a wash on the AIM.

I've got well over 400 laps this season at the Ridge I can export from AIM if you want to give it a look over.

Originally Posted by Fishey
The differences in lap time on Awd and Rwd usually play into Rwds favor until around 500whp then it gets close after 600whp there is no comparison the extra traction provided by awd makes for a faster lap time.


I should note this is on a near stock aero level or less then 700lbs of overall downforce. I have not run comparisons at high levels of aero (talking 1,500lbs+ of downforce type levels)
Last week with AWD chasing a 997.2 GT3RS (wet/damp which really made the AWD system shine)

This week with RWD

Last edited by vandersmith; 07-23-2016 at 01:42 PM.
Old 07-23-2016, 02:13 PM
  #25  
vandersmith
Pro
Thread Starter
 
vandersmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 611
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Here's what my current alignment settings are:



Stock GT2 Alignment for Comparison:



Stock 996TT:



GT3:

Old 07-23-2016, 05:00 PM
  #26  
vandersmith
Pro
Thread Starter
 
vandersmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 611
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default


Last edited by vandersmith; 07-23-2016 at 07:27 PM.
Old 07-24-2016, 11:26 PM
  #27  
vandersmith
Pro
Thread Starter
 
vandersmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 611
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

RWD is done, Differential and Axles are out, Stubs are in...I guess I'm a 996 C4-2S now



Quick bang to loosen the axles.




Axle bolts off.




Axles disconnected.




Diff hanging by support bracket.




Getting ready to drop.




Out.

Last edited by vandersmith; 07-24-2016 at 11:45 PM.
Old 07-25-2016, 01:00 PM
  #28  
white out
Three Wheelin'
 
white out's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,392
Received 5 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Wow. Can't wait to see what times you put down without the extra weight of the AWD system in the car.
Old 07-31-2016, 04:45 AM
  #29  
vandersmith
Pro
Thread Starter
 
vandersmith's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Seattle
Posts: 611
Received 9 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

Big week coming up.

Monday: 3rd Set of NT01s arrive
Tuesday: Dyno Tuning
Wednesday: Corner Balance + Alignment
Friday: PCA day at The Ridge

Can't wait!
Old 07-31-2016, 01:14 PM
  #30  
powdrhound
Rennlist Member
 
powdrhound's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Posts: 6,847
Received 1,735 Likes on 1,011 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by vandersmith
Big week coming up.

Monday: 3rd Set of NT01s arrive
Tuesday: Dyno Tuning
Wednesday: Corner Balance + Alignment
Friday: PCA day at The Ridge

Can't wait!
For a RWD set up, go with 1º more negative camber in the front than rear. Set up the car with a 20mm rake based off the chassis measuring points. I run 102/123 and it works very well. Make sure PSM is fully disconnected (by pulling the plug under the master cylinder), not just turned off with the dash button.

As far as NT01s, go with a 245/40 and 305/35 combo. Do not go with a 315/30/18. I've run 25+ sets of NT01s over the last 4 years and the 315/30/18 is not good choice. It works but for RWD the taller 305/35 is a much better option, less rollover, higher load rating, larger contact patch, more grip. If you have fully adjustable LCAs and full mono *****, you can fit 275/335 NT01s with a little bit of modding. Those are the best choice.

Bring that thing down to Miller in September to run the 4.5 mile course. We have a group of us going...

Love lapis blau, but I'm a bit biased..


Quick Reply: RWD Conversion @ the Track



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:54 AM.