Notices
996 Turbo Forum 1999-2005
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

UMW tune

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-27-2015, 10:31 PM
  #16  
dutch86
Intermediate
 
dutch86's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: KCK
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have a question. How many of you went with the "standard" tune and how many of you went with the data logger to make it customized for your area/car? I already have an OBDII reader, so I wouldn't need that. But I am curious to know how much more beneficial the data logger is? Thanks!
Old 05-28-2015, 12:57 AM
  #17  
James88
Three Wheelin'
 
James88's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 1,738
Received 153 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dutch86
I have a question. How many of you went with the "standard" tune and how many of you went with the data logger to make it customized for your area/car? I already have an OBDII reader, so I wouldn't need that. But I am curious to know how much more beneficial the data logger is? Thanks!
I went with the data logger to make it customized, very happy and no issues from day one. Kevin is the man that's for sure.
Old 05-28-2015, 12:30 PM
  #18  
wross996tt
Race Car
 
wross996tt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 4,855
Received 82 Likes on 61 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dutch86
I have a question. How many of you went with the "standard" tune and how many of you went with the data logger to make it customized for your area/car? I already have an OBDII reader, so I wouldn't need that. But I am curious to know how much more beneficial the data logger is? Thanks!
I did my tune before Kevin had a data logger. I sent durametric data to him to customize my tune as I am at high altitude.
Old 05-31-2015, 03:13 PM
  #19  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,715
Received 406 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dutch86
I have a question. How many of you went with the "standard" tune and how many of you went with the data logger to make it customized for your area/car? I already have an OBDII reader, so I wouldn't need that. But I am curious to know how much more beneficial the data logger is? Thanks!
Standard tune for 93 octane.
Old 05-31-2015, 03:54 PM
  #20  
Kevin
Addict
Rennlist Member


Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
Kevin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Northwest
Posts: 9,308
Received 309 Likes on 215 Posts
Default

Autobonrun, What file have you loaded into the ECU? You have more than "a" standard 93 octane file! You have files in location 2 and File location 4??
Old 05-31-2015, 07:48 PM
  #21  
autobonrun
Rennlist Member
 
autobonrun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: kansas
Posts: 2,715
Received 406 Likes on 257 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Kevin
Autobonrun, What file have you loaded into the ECU? You have more than "a" standard 93 octane file! You have files in location 2 and File location 4??
I loaded the tune software. I did not reload the OEM. I thought he was asking did I use a PC based data logger with several other variables adjusted to certain specifications. I was saying I used the OBD plug in programmer with the tune just as provided.

Last edited by autobonrun; 06-08-2015 at 10:41 PM.



Quick Reply: UMW tune



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:35 PM.