Content for Burmester
#16
Music is a unique form of communication. With language we can read the printed words and get the exact same information regardless of font, clarity, pace. We are able to understand the stutterer. Stephen Hawking redefines the cosmos through a straw.
Music on the other hand, is inextricably bound up in the medium. That Fleetwood Mac recording was Digitally Ruined, and once that was done no amount of half-speed cutting or quality vinyl will ever get it back.
Now the fact remains I did enjoy that album for many years before realizing it was Digitally Ruined. But from then on I would never listen to it, except as a demonstration to certain people of just how much difference these things really do make. And yes I have done this and yes everyone notices.
Oh wait, that's not quite right! I won't play the original album either, because now I have a true half speed cutting from the original master recording on a 45 rpm LP. Listen to both versions and I will guarantee, in spite of whatever you think, you will not only prefer the 45 you will be stunned at how much better it sounds.
Assuming of course you care about the music. People who get little from music get little from music played better. It all depends.
#17
Drifting
Originally Posted by me!
The Burmester was a tough choice - I couldn't hear one in a 911 and the system that I listened to in a Cayenne was nice, but not $5300 nice.
However, I appreciate your effort here attempting to educate us all. Most people - especially young people - don't realize how ****-poor MP3 quality is. But that's all they know, so they don't know what they're missing. Those of us who grew up with vinyl, those of us that can remember it and who had a decent turntable on which to play said vinyl, can appreciate the differences.