Notices
991 GT3, GT3RS, GT2RS and 911R 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

991.2 GT3 stick slower to 60 mph than 997.2 GT3 stick?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-19-2017, 09:06 PM
  #1  
Nacelle
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nacelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cascadian corridor
Posts: 1,380
Received 160 Likes on 78 Posts
Default 991.2 GT3 stick slower to 60 mph than 997.2 GT3 stick?

According to some Road & Track data performance tests back when of the 997.2 GT3 compared to the release information from Porsche on the new 991.2 stick

I doubt it very much...

A repost of post #39 see below

Guys...

The purpose of this thread was to create conversation and analysis, which it has accomplished. The topic thread header was finished with a question mark, it was certainly not making a statement or claims of fact or that it was a relevant comparison to anything on equal footing. Again, a conversation starter...


Jax
Attached Images   

Last edited by Nacelle; 03-25-2017 at 11:20 PM. Reason: To clarify the object of the thread
Old 03-19-2017, 09:13 PM
  #2  
MEM82
Burning Brakes
 
MEM82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Hudson Valley, New York
Posts: 995
Received 265 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nacelle
According to some Road & Track data performance tests back when of the 997.2 GT3 compared to the release information from Porsche on the new 991.2 stick

I doubt it very much...
My guess is that's a mag tested time vs Porsches factory time for the 991.2 The factory time is likely conservative
Old 03-19-2017, 09:21 PM
  #3  
PC Valkyrie
Instructor
 
PC Valkyrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Yes, magazine test times are often a bit faster than what the manufacturer claims. Also, you need to distinguish between 0-60mph and 0-100km/h times.

Porsche claims a 0-60mph time of 3.8 seconds and a 0-100km/h time of 3.9 seconds.

Time will tell what the independent magazine tests reveal.

But to be honest, why would anybody wishing for a manual transmission care? You are not getting this car for the acceleration numbers, right?
Old 03-19-2017, 09:26 PM
  #4  
PC Valkyrie
Instructor
 
PC Valkyrie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto, Canada
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

One other thing. These 0-60mph times that American car magazines do on manual transmission cars often involve revving the engine to a certain rpm and then dumping the clutch for a hard launch. And for automatic/dual clutch gearboxes, they engage launch control for these tests.

Really not realistic of what happens most of the time. Unless you really want to fry your clutch, most people simply "soft launch" the car without revving the engine that high before engaging the clutch. That's why I pay more attention to the 5-60mph time which is far more representative of what most people will do at a stop light.
Old 03-19-2017, 09:44 PM
  #5  
robmypro
Race Director
 
robmypro's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Colorado
Posts: 10,220
Received 1,772 Likes on 1,020 Posts
Default

Same thing can be said against the Panamera Turbo.
Old 03-19-2017, 10:26 PM
  #6  
sgroer
Rennlist Member
 
sgroer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Chattanooga, TN
Posts: 3,538
Received 1,013 Likes on 280 Posts
Default

cant the damn thing go almost 60 in first gear anyways? Revving to 9k it must get close.
Old 03-19-2017, 10:45 PM
  #7  
Nacelle
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Nacelle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Cascadian corridor
Posts: 1,380
Received 160 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by PC Valkyrie
You are not getting this car for the acceleration numbers, right?
I'm certainly not and I assume the balance of those opting for manual won't be either...
Old 03-19-2017, 10:48 PM
  #8  
shaytun
Burning Brakes
 
shaytun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,054
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

911R: 0-60 3.4s
Expect the same. http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...ed-test-review
Old 03-19-2017, 10:53 PM
  #9  
Spyder Man
Instructor
 
Spyder Man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Sydney
Posts: 112
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Performance figures are by no means set in stone.


Different temperatures and road conditions alone would cause variations.


Further 0-60mph or 0-100kmh is not such a good indicator anymore due to modern high performance cars are so powerful that traction becomes an issue.


For a better indication of drag performance start with the 0-100mph or 0-160kmh figures


0-100mph/(0-160kmh)
Car (Source)
991.2 GT3 7.6s (Porsche)
997 4.0 RS 7.9s (Porsche)
997 GT3 8.3s (R&T)


The 991.2 GT3 is even faster than the 997 4.0 RS
Old 03-19-2017, 10:53 PM
  #10  
LehmanZ06
Pro
 
LehmanZ06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: South Florida
Posts: 674
Received 96 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

I have a base 991.2 no sport chrono best 60 ft time 1.800
I had a 2010 GT3 best 60 ft time approx 1.840-1.850

Porsche quotes 0-60 mph for my base no sport chrono car 4.2 probably closer 3.4-3.6 seconds Porsche numbers conservative by approximately .6 minimum.
Old 03-20-2017, 01:15 AM
  #11  
ipse dixit
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
ipse dixit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 16,345
Likes: 0
Received 10,780 Likes on 4,774 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nacelle
According to some Road & Track data performance tests back when of the 997.2 GT3 compared to the release information from Porsche on the new 991.2 stick

I doubt it very much...
Yes, but it's now even more engaging.
Old 03-20-2017, 09:19 AM
  #12  
Chris3963
Rennlist Member
 
Chris3963's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Antipodes
Posts: 2,639
Received 1,083 Likes on 384 Posts
Default

If my understanding is correct, most of, if not all, the magazines in the US allow for 1 ft of rollout which is why the times recorded in US magazines are always faster than the times quoted in the ROW. So Porsche are not overly conservative, it's just that the US uses a different measuring methodology which exaggerates the 0-60 time.
Old 03-20-2017, 09:40 AM
  #13  
tgavem
Three Wheelin'
 
tgavem's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,948
Received 196 Likes on 117 Posts
Default

The 991.2 S has more torque than the GT3..........

Why are we comparing 0-60 times, it is on the track where it matters.........if you want fast 0-60, get PDK or buy the 991.1 Turbo S used for same money.

Last edited by tgavem; 03-20-2017 at 11:00 AM.
Old 03-20-2017, 10:01 AM
  #14  
rave426
Pro
 
rave426's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 687
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 5 Posts
Default

Honestly...why would it matter? I hate 0-60
Old 03-20-2017, 11:22 AM
  #15  
Nick Yoskin
Burning Brakes
 
Nick Yoskin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 752
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Does anyone know the date that Porsche has for the "press" to road test?


Quick Reply: 991.2 GT3 stick slower to 60 mph than 997.2 GT3 stick?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:10 PM.