Notices
964 Forum 1989-1994
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

My 964th Rennlist Post! Big Brakes, EVO Uprights, and the Slippery Slope...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-08-2013, 03:24 PM
  #16  
perrew
Instructor
 
perrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 209
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Very nice writeup!! Im doing the m/c swap, but is it really necessary to change to the 993 brake booster?
Tks P
Old 03-08-2013, 03:39 PM
  #17  
KaiB
Banned
 
KaiB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deep Downtown Carrier, OK
Posts: 5,297
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by perrew
Very nice writeup!! Im doing the m/c swap, but is it really necessary to change to the 993 brake booster?
Tks P
nope...
Old 03-08-2013, 06:52 PM
  #18  
RSAErick
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RSAErick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,198
Received 41 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by perrew
...Im doing the m/c swap, but is it really necessary to change to the 993 brake booster?
Tks P
Originally Posted by KaiB
nope...
Interesting... I had come to the conclusion (assumption?) that the 993 booster was the required mate to the 993 master cylinder. It appeared that the 964 'spring assembly' was located on the m/c; whereas the 993 'spring assembly' resides in the booster. Here is a pic of the external differences (Left = 964; Right = 993):



I do not have a good picture of the internal portion of each booster, so please tell me if my logic (or lack thereof) has failed me...

Thanks.
Old 03-08-2013, 07:05 PM
  #19  
KaiB
Banned
 
KaiB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Deep Downtown Carrier, OK
Posts: 5,297
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Erick, I glibly said nope due to the fact that I run a big brake system without either a M/C or a booster swap...

I actually don't know for a fact that I'm correct - and if I'm not, Bill V. will dang sure let us know...tehe. I'm curious, but I do remember discussing this with Weiner and it sure seemed that one could indeed run the 993M/C without the expensive booster swap.
Old 03-09-2013, 01:07 AM
  #20  
993PET
Rennlist Member
 
993PET's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Medina, OH
Posts: 1,712
Received 9 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

I did both. I don't think the 993 MC fits with the 964 booster.

JF
Old 09-04-2013, 11:28 AM
  #21  
Hsianers
Instructor
 
Hsianers's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Kuala Lumpur
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Erick

Thank you for the most informative write up... I am in the midst of rebuilding a 964T 3.3 and was looking to go with Big Reds as the costs of overhauling the existing 20 year old calipers appeared to be fairly costly.. Will need to reconsider next steps based on this post...
Old 09-04-2013, 02:54 PM
  #22  
RSAErick
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RSAErick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,198
Received 41 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Hsianers
Erick

Thank you for the most informative write up... I am in the midst of rebuilding a 964T 3.3 and was looking to go with Big Reds as the costs of overhauling the existing 20 year old calipers appeared to be fairly costly.. Will need to reconsider next steps based on this post...
I'm glad that you found it helpful. Good luck with your project!
Old 09-05-2013, 11:09 PM
  #23  
ACSGP
Pro
 
ACSGP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Singapore
Posts: 623
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RSAErick
I'm glad that you found it helpful. Good luck with your project!
Bit of a dumb question Erick, but does the RSA run the C2 brake set-up (vacuum assisted) or the C4 set-up (hydraulic)?

If you're on the C2 set-up, did you consider using the hydraulic system, or was cost too prohibitive? I know quite a few people have bought a C4, converted it into a C2, but retained the hydraulic system.
Old 09-05-2013, 11:32 PM
  #24  
RSAErick
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RSAErick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,198
Received 41 Likes on 1 Post
Default

It's the same brake system as C2. It would be nice to have the C4 brake system, but I went with the easier and cheaper option. I don't know exactly what all would be involved with going from the vacuum to hydraulic brake system. Are you considering that?
Old 09-06-2013, 12:07 AM
  #25  
Vandit
Nordschleife Master
 
Vandit's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 5,614
Likes: 0
Received 47 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

Rennlist & Pelicanparts member perelet is currently in the process of converting his C2 to hydraulic boost. Knowing him, it's likely he is documenting the heck out of that conversion.
Old 11-06-2013, 02:34 PM
  #26  
oldtimer
Racer
 
oldtimer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: cheshire
Posts: 275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Hi Erick , thanks for the write up. My 964C2 has had most of the modifications you describe done by previous owner . Looking at the bills , here's the list of bits

993Turbo big red front calipers
964RS rear calipers
993GT2 front uprights
993GT2 tie rods
993 master cylinder
'993 master cylinder pipe kit to 964'

There is no mention of the 993 vacuum booster , so assume the 964 original is still in place.

When I first got the car , the brake lights would come on even if brake pedal not depressed - not always , but when friends followed me they would see it happening intermittently . My independent Porsche specialist made adjustment at the pedal box to cure this , however......

he noticed that when the engine was started , the brake pedal would depress itself slightly - a movement of about 5mm at the pedal .

we did not think any more about this until recently when i found it really hard to manually push the car along ( engine off ) when queuing in the pitlane to go out on circuit.

on further examination it looks like with the engine running the vacuum booster is putting the brakes on slightly, visible evidence is the brake pedal movement , and there is no spring acting to resist this......this also seems to appear as a drag on the brakes even when engine is switched off unless the brake pedal is manually put back to 'off' position.

So looking at the differences between 993 m/c and 964 m/c , maybe using the 964 booster results in a 'pull' on the brake pedal equivalent to a push on the brakes...and the cure is to fit the 993 booster...????
Old 11-06-2013, 08:12 PM
  #27  
perelet
Instructor
 
perelet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Escondido, CA
Posts: 131
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by oldtimer
....
Looking at the bills , here's the list of bits
....
993 master cylinder
'993 master cylinder pipe kit to 964'
....
There is no mention of the 993 vacuum booster , so assume the 964 original is still in place.
Problem is that 993 has return spring inside booster while 964 has return spring on MC. You should use MC/booster as pair. 993 MC will bolt in to 964 booster, but you lose return spring.

See pic of both earlier on in this thread.

Oleg
Old 01-26-2014, 05:06 PM
  #28  
Paul284pt
Rennlist Member
 
Paul284pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Yorkshire, England
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Hi Erick,

Just been having another look at your great info as I'm about to complete my brake system.

I have already fitted 964 3.6 Turbo callipers front (with adapters and turbo discs) and the matching rear 3.6T callipers (with 968CS M030 discs).

I am about to follow you and fit a new 993 master cylinder, 993 vacuum booster, master cylinder mounting bracket, gasket and bias valve. Finally, new brake lines/fittings.

Question: Is it possible to keep my existing brake reservoir?

Thanks in advance,
Paul
Old 01-26-2014, 09:24 PM
  #29  
RSAErick
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
RSAErick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Seattle
Posts: 1,198
Received 41 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Paul284pt
I have already fitted 964 3.6 Turbo callipers front (with adapters and turbo discs) and the matching rear 3.6T callipers (with 968CS M030 discs).

I am about to follow you and fit a new 993 master cylinder, 993 vacuum booster, master cylinder mounting bracket, gasket and bias valve. Finally, new brake lines/fittings.

Question: Is it possible to keep my existing brake reservoir?
I believe that this should be fine. I kept the 964 reservoir, and have not had any issues with the 993 master cylinder and booster under hard track use. In fact, it has been rock solid with no fade whatsoever. I do not know the exact difference in volume between the 964 3.6T/964T and 993TT/993C2 calipers; however, I don't expect this would change the equation much, if at all.

Enjoy!
Old 01-27-2014, 05:09 AM
  #30  
Paul284pt
Rennlist Member
 
Paul284pt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Yorkshire, England
Posts: 855
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

Hi Erick,

Thanks very much for your prompt response. That's great we'll get on with it!

If yopu don't mind may I borrow a couple of your photos from this thread to help with the installation?

All the best,
Paul


Quick Reply: My 964th Rennlist Post! Big Brakes, EVO Uprights, and the Slippery Slope...



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 12:00 AM.