Notices
944 & 944S Forum 1982-1991

300zx vs. rx7 vs. 944 vs. supra

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-26-2004, 11:44 AM
  #1  
MeMickey
8th Gear
Thread Starter
 
MeMickey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default 300zx vs. rx7 vs. 944 vs. supra

If i had a 944 or 944 turbo out on the highway and I happen to pull alongside a 95 nissan 300zx, a 95 mazda rx7, and a 95 supra, who should have the bragging rights? Basically I just wanna burn people on windier roads. Which car would beat all the others?
Old 09-26-2004, 05:06 PM
  #2  
inactiveuser92616
Drifting
 
inactiveuser92616's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Northern Colorado
Posts: 2,273
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

not the 944, unless moderately modified. My money would be one the nissan or mazda, if all were stock.
Old 09-26-2004, 09:56 PM
  #3  
Dave in Chicago
Rennlist Member
 
Dave in Chicago's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Chicago Area
Posts: 2,886
Received 269 Likes on 174 Posts
Default

Now, take them to the track every weekend and flog them mercilessly into the 100k mile plus range... Then, you'll see the P-cars stand out. They are quite durable.
Old 09-27-2004, 04:18 PM
  #4  
jim944s2
Racer
 
jim944s2's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Tacoma WA
Posts: 456
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

A stock 944T should beat a stock non-turbo 300zx in most any circumstance (200hp?, but quite heavy). The other two and a 300turbo are pretty tough cars. I think you'd be bringing up the rear. So many of the supras and 300turbos are modded now, and they get some really-really big hp numbers.
Old 09-30-2004, 12:50 AM
  #5  
seanbrowning
Advanced
 
seanbrowning's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 97
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Pupras with the large numbers are drag cars. They don't drive like a sports car, more GT styling. The rex is debatable, they pull about the same numbers if I am not mistaken, but a 944turbo would handle better with the 50/50 distribution. I dunno about the 300zx though, never seen or driven one. just my 2 cents
Old 09-30-2004, 12:57 PM
  #6  
Blue S2
Race Car
 
Blue S2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Washington, D.C.
Posts: 4,220
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I bet you can cruise a lot more comfortably at 150mph all day long while those struggle up there! 944s are NOT drag cars. Remember as well, you are comparing 70s technology with cars made in the 90s. If you compared the 944 with hondas and nissans from the same year, i bet the 944 would have an advantage. Especially the Turbo-S.
Old 09-30-2004, 05:02 PM
  #7  
Tom R.
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Tom R.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Mile High
Posts: 10,211
Received 121 Likes on 88 Posts
Default

My buddy has a 91 300Zx since new, I had first and second gen RX7s, and had two 944 S2s.

For pulling up at say 70 mph on the highway and flogging it, i would rather have my Z28 over what I mentioned. For a twisty mountain road, well, that depends on the tires.
Old 10-03-2004, 10:22 PM
  #8  
pcarfan944
Burning Brakes
 
pcarfan944's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,050
Received 72 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

I've driven everyone of those except the 300ZX turbo (but I have driven the N/A). The twin turbo Supras are just scary fast, the third generation RX-7 wasn't as fast as I was expecting, but still faster on paper then the 944T. Of course, these cars are almost ten years newer than a 944, if you want to compare like years and similar engines (I.E. apples to apples) you'll see that Porsche is always superior.



Quick Reply: 300zx vs. rx7 vs. 944 vs. supra



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:26 AM.