Low mileage 3.2 value
#1
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Low mileage 3.2 value
Considering a few options on Dealer 3.2 cars, would appreciate views on values (don't forget it's showroom value and not private sale).
1989 3.2 with 60,000 miles
1988 3.2 with 45,000 miles
1985 3.2 with 40,000 miles
1984 3.2 with 15,000 miles
All have whale tail and usual condition for age/mileages listed circa $45 - 50k range except the low miler which is in concours condition (no idea on price yet). Not quite sure what I should offer/close on if PPI comes through ok so will welcome feedback.
1989 3.2 with 60,000 miles
1988 3.2 with 45,000 miles
1985 3.2 with 40,000 miles
1984 3.2 with 15,000 miles
All have whale tail and usual condition for age/mileages listed circa $45 - 50k range except the low miler which is in concours condition (no idea on price yet). Not quite sure what I should offer/close on if PPI comes through ok so will welcome feedback.
#2
Three Wheelin'
For the cars you mentioned the prices seem reasonable. I would even expect the high end price to exceed $50K. You can make a reasonable offer and make it conditional on the PPI. I typically say I am not going to nickel and dime on some wearables (say less than $500). However, if something is wrong like suspension, transmission, engine all best are off and the price will have to be adjusted accordingly. If the seller balks you probably should run away.
#7
Three Wheelin'
Thread Starter
Obviously looking at both given the selection of years I posted above. The air-cooled madness started with backdating idea so got a 964 as base car but decided its too nice to rip apart so looked for a G series, dismissed the 74-77 for poor mechanics - next was the SC vs 3.2 dilemma, really wanted the SC for the revvy engine and the 83 model for improved mechanics & seat positioning but not many around and along the way figured I prefer the look of 3.2, specially the engine bay which I think is by far the prettiest in all 911 stock engines. So decided on 84-86 model but then I prefer the headlights on the later 3.2 (G50) so definitely leaning towards that (87-89) and a nice clean one so the backdate idea is pretty much in tatters and hunt is on for the ideal 3.2.
But to answer your question I have a G50 on my 964 so for variety sake and historical reference wouldn't mind the 915 but on the other hand G50 is supposed to be the better g/box .... so will just leave that to the Car - if the right car turns up at the right price & condition then I will take it with whatever box it comes in!
But to answer your question I have a G50 on my 964 so for variety sake and historical reference wouldn't mind the 915 but on the other hand G50 is supposed to be the better g/box .... so will just leave that to the Car - if the right car turns up at the right price & condition then I will take it with whatever box it comes in!