Range anxiety is a fallacy
#32
Burning Brakes
A hundred years ago in the USA, a Ford Model T had a 10-gallon gas tank and got 13-21 mpg, for a total range of 130-210 miles.
#33
The point is that the infrastructure to support recharging EVs on the road may be a limiting factor today, but likely won't be for much longer.
#34
Rennlist Member
The point is that the infrastructure to support recharging EVs on the road may be a limiting factor today, but likely won't be for much longer.
fossil fuel's "killer" feature _IS_ their energy density, stability, and portability - their power/weight ratio is awesome and unparalleled - it's entirely practical to bring your energy "with you" for long trips (jerry cans anyone for long distance travel?) - it does however require planning and foresight. EV's require infrastructure to go long distances, ICE's benefit, but do not necessarily require infrastructure to go long distances (up to a point)...
I foresee ICE fuel based transportation remaining with us for some time, and in particular remaining the best choice for particular use cases…that should not inhibit the transition to EV based transportation in high density, high infrastructure environments which currently suffer from congestion and large amounts of emissions - and less dense less infrastructure areas could remain fossil fuel based and that type of mix would still represent major progress.
#35
Burning Brakes
while I'm a big fan/believer that the whole long distance travel thing can be mitigated with a greater investment in infrastructure…
fossil fuel's "killer" feature _IS_ their energy density, stability, and portability - their power/weight ratio is awesome and unparalleled - it's entirely practical to bring your energy "with you" for long trips (jerry cans anyone for long distance travel?) - it does however require planning and foresight. EV's require infrastructure to go long distances, ICE's benefit, but do not necessarily require infrastructure to go long distances (up to a point)...
I foresee ICE fuel based transportation remaining with us for some time, and in particular remaining the best choice for particular use cases…that should not inhibit the transition to EV based transportation in high density, high infrastructure environments which currently suffer from congestion and large amounts of emissions - and less dense less infrastructure areas could remain fossil fuel based and that type of mix would still represent major progress.
fossil fuel's "killer" feature _IS_ their energy density, stability, and portability - their power/weight ratio is awesome and unparalleled - it's entirely practical to bring your energy "with you" for long trips (jerry cans anyone for long distance travel?) - it does however require planning and foresight. EV's require infrastructure to go long distances, ICE's benefit, but do not necessarily require infrastructure to go long distances (up to a point)...
I foresee ICE fuel based transportation remaining with us for some time, and in particular remaining the best choice for particular use cases…that should not inhibit the transition to EV based transportation in high density, high infrastructure environments which currently suffer from congestion and large amounts of emissions - and less dense less infrastructure areas could remain fossil fuel based and that type of mix would still represent major progress.
#36
I suspect the future for EV won't be quick chargers but replacement fuel cells. Instead of waiting 40 mins for a charge at a rest stop, you pull in, get on some kind of lift, take out your spent fuel cell/battery, replace it and be on your way. The key will be getting all the manufacturers to agree to design their EV around ONE HOMOGENEOUS FUEL CELL, that way "battery station" don't have to stock multiple cells for different vehicle types.
#37
#38
Burning Brakes
I suspect the future for EV won't be quick chargers but replacement fuel cells. Instead of waiting 40 mins for a charge at a rest stop, you pull in, get on some kind of lift, take out your spent fuel cell/battery, replace it and be on your way. The key will be getting all the manufacturers to agree to design their EV around ONE HOMOGENEOUS FUEL CELL, that way "battery station" don't have to stock multiple cells for different vehicle types.
Fast charging has been making big leaps, but unfortunately each time creating a new "standard". My prediction is that sometime in the future (perhaps not near future) there will be some agreement or mandate on charging standards and you'll see charging stations pretty common at locations beyond just dedicated charging stations.
#39
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
When I adopted two dogs from the pound, my road trip habits changed drastically - I now stop every hour or so to walk the dogs and stretch my legs as well. It makes trips far more relaxing and I have seen many interesting places and met new friends I normally would have sped by at 80 mph.
Having said that, an EV with a max range of about 100 miles would have worked exceedingly well as my daily driver. Have to go further? Switch cars with the wife. My problem? The ones I liked were too expensive. Totally would have gotten an i3 if not for the price point. I’m not completely sold on Tesla either, although I have driven them and they are pretty damn good. So I ended up with a GTi for $26k MSRP. Once these hit even more mass production and the price comes down, I think the take rate will go up.
#40
I just bought a practically brand new 2017 Fiat 500e with 1300 miles on it for $15k. It is fantastic to drive and probably the best automotive bargain out there right now. Still can't wait for my Toucan..the future is awesome!
#41
Drifting
Since I live in the land of EV's I have spoken to a lot of people about this issue. Their response is that they changed their driving habits slightly during road trips. They said their stops are much more relaxing now since they are not always rushing to get back on the road as quickly as possible. There is time to get out of the car, eat, stretch a little and then get back on the road. I am still a little skeptical, but makes sense to me in a lot of ways.
Looks like I'll be Taycan :-)
Or better yet -- I'll haul the Spec Boxster behind the RV -- and she'll drive the Taycan -- and she'll blow by me every few hours after I catch her while she's "refilling"!
M
#43
Race Car
Right now EV's are pretty terrible road trip cars. Driving my Tesla adds about 20% to the drive time for any trip that requires charging - that's a lot. Will certainly be worse in an EV that doesn't benefit from the extensive Tesla charging network.
#44
An ICE powered vehicle is at its most efficient under steady state conditions such as extended highway slogs - EVs are best in stop and start within a bounded area (Range/2).
#45
Rennlist Member
I mostly agree with Uncle will's statement - I find EV's most effective if you limit your fast charging stops to 1 or 2 a day - anything more than that makes it a slog - but no one should fear a road trip with one fast charging stop along the way - once you are planning 2 or more stops per day the EV charging penalty really starts to kick in on over all trip time.
1 stop is no big deal and some what refreshing.
1 stop is no big deal and some what refreshing.