Notices
Taycan 2019-Current The Electric Porsche
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Range anxiety is a fallacy

Old 04-15-2018, 03:04 PM
  #31  
unclewill
Racer
Thread Starter
 
unclewill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 279
Received 76 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

You couldn't exactly go for long road trips in ICE vehicles in 1918 - the horse riders would be laughing at the prospect!! We are on the cusp of a revolution...
Old 04-19-2018, 07:52 PM
  #32  
cometguy
Burning Brakes
 
cometguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CARB state, USA
Posts: 1,133
Received 219 Likes on 154 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclewill
You couldn't exactly go for long road trips in ICE vehicles in 1918 - the horse riders would be laughing at the prospect!! We are on the cusp of a revolution...
A hundred years ago in the USA, a Ford Model T had a 10-gallon gas tank and got 13-21 mpg, for a total range of 130-210 miles.
Old 04-19-2018, 10:22 PM
  #33  
unclewill
Racer
Thread Starter
 
unclewill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 279
Received 76 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cometguy
A hundred years ago in the USA, a Ford Model T had a 10-gallon gas tank and got 13-21 mpg, for a total range of 130-210 miles.
All fine and dandy if you could find a gas station!
The point is that the infrastructure to support recharging EVs on the road may be a limiting factor today, but likely won't be for much longer.
Old 04-19-2018, 10:42 PM
  #34  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,295
Received 3,600 Likes on 1,757 Posts
Default

The point is that the infrastructure to support recharging EVs on the road may be a limiting factor today, but likely won't be for much longer.
while I'm a big fan/believer that the whole long distance travel thing can be mitigated with a greater investment in infrastructure…

fossil fuel's "killer" feature _IS_ their energy density, stability, and portability - their power/weight ratio is awesome and unparalleled - it's entirely practical to bring your energy "with you" for long trips (jerry cans anyone for long distance travel?) - it does however require planning and foresight. EV's require infrastructure to go long distances, ICE's benefit, but do not necessarily require infrastructure to go long distances (up to a point)...

I foresee ICE fuel based transportation remaining with us for some time, and in particular remaining the best choice for particular use cases…that should not inhibit the transition to EV based transportation in high density, high infrastructure environments which currently suffer from congestion and large amounts of emissions - and less dense less infrastructure areas could remain fossil fuel based and that type of mix would still represent major progress.
Old 04-19-2018, 11:45 PM
  #35  
cometguy
Burning Brakes
 
cometguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2018
Location: CARB state, USA
Posts: 1,133
Received 219 Likes on 154 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by daveo4porsche
while I'm a big fan/believer that the whole long distance travel thing can be mitigated with a greater investment in infrastructure…

fossil fuel's "killer" feature _IS_ their energy density, stability, and portability - their power/weight ratio is awesome and unparalleled - it's entirely practical to bring your energy "with you" for long trips (jerry cans anyone for long distance travel?) - it does however require planning and foresight. EV's require infrastructure to go long distances, ICE's benefit, but do not necessarily require infrastructure to go long distances (up to a point)...

I foresee ICE fuel based transportation remaining with us for some time, and in particular remaining the best choice for particular use cases…that should not inhibit the transition to EV based transportation in high density, high infrastructure environments which currently suffer from congestion and large amounts of emissions - and less dense less infrastructure areas could remain fossil fuel based and that type of mix would still represent major progress.
Yes, that's the key point: EVs are important mainly for highly congested/polluted urban areas, not for more rural areas. What I hope is that there will be a good mix of EVs and PHEVs (or hybrids with ICE and fuel cells), the latter good for both local commuting and long-distance/rural travel. I see that Volvo is really moving forward with hybrid trucks now, which can go all-electric in congested urban areas (for zero pollution and very little noise) and then back to ICE for outside of congested areas -- and busses also. This is really wonderful stuff.
Old 04-20-2018, 10:44 PM
  #36  
Akunob
Rennlist Member
 
Akunob's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 4,032
Received 896 Likes on 569 Posts
Default

I suspect the future for EV won't be quick chargers but replacement fuel cells. Instead of waiting 40 mins for a charge at a rest stop, you pull in, get on some kind of lift, take out your spent fuel cell/battery, replace it and be on your way. The key will be getting all the manufacturers to agree to design their EV around ONE HOMOGENEOUS FUEL CELL, that way "battery station" don't have to stock multiple cells for different vehicle types.
Old 04-21-2018, 03:06 AM
  #37  
DannieK
Rennlist Member
 
DannieK's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 196
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by cometguy
A hundred years ago in the USA, a Ford Model T had a 10-gallon gas tank and got 13-21 mpg, for a total range of 130-210 miles.
Early on before gas or service stations existed the only place to buy gasoline was a pharmacy. Pharmacists used it as a solvent.
Old 04-21-2018, 04:51 AM
  #38  
Pokerhobo
Burning Brakes
 
Pokerhobo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Washington State
Posts: 1,054
Received 534 Likes on 292 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Akunob
I suspect the future for EV won't be quick chargers but replacement fuel cells. Instead of waiting 40 mins for a charge at a rest stop, you pull in, get on some kind of lift, take out your spent fuel cell/battery, replace it and be on your way. The key will be getting all the manufacturers to agree to design their EV around ONE HOMOGENEOUS FUEL CELL, that way "battery station" don't have to stock multiple cells for different vehicle types.
The whole concept of replacing the battery than recharging seems to have died before it was really got going. Prototypes were demoed even by Tesla, but part of the problem is one of the advantages of batteries. You can kind of stick them anywhere vs a gasoline tank. Tesla puts it as part of the bottom frame giving a low center of gravity, but also each Tesla model is unique, so you can't swap out one for another. Even within a model, you have variants with different battery sizes. So a swapping station would now need to have on stock multiple sizes and shapes which doubles for each new brand it has to support.

Fast charging has been making big leaps, but unfortunately each time creating a new "standard". My prediction is that sometime in the future (perhaps not near future) there will be some agreement or mandate on charging standards and you'll see charging stations pretty common at locations beyond just dedicated charging stations.
Old 04-22-2018, 11:57 AM
  #39  
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Needsdecaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Woodlands, TX.
Posts: 8,812
Received 2,524 Likes on 1,571 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by unclewill
When I adopted two dogs from the pound, my road trip habits changed drastically - I now stop every hour or so to walk the dogs and stretch my legs as well. It makes trips far more relaxing and I have seen many interesting places and met new friends I normally would have sped by at 80 mph.
Obviously your road trips don’t cover 500 miles through West Texas, or somewhere similar.

Having said that, an EV with a max range of about 100 miles would have worked exceedingly well as my daily driver. Have to go further? Switch cars with the wife. My problem? The ones I liked were too expensive. Totally would have gotten an i3 if not for the price point. I’m not completely sold on Tesla either, although I have driven them and they are pretty damn good. So I ended up with a GTi for $26k MSRP. Once these hit even more mass production and the price comes down, I think the take rate will go up.
Old 06-14-2018, 08:57 PM
  #40  
unclewill
Racer
Thread Starter
 
unclewill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 279
Received 76 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

I just bought a practically brand new 2017 Fiat 500e with 1300 miles on it for $15k. It is fantastic to drive and probably the best automotive bargain out there right now. Still can't wait for my Toucan..the future is awesome!
Old 06-15-2018, 01:09 PM
  #41  
txhokie4life
Drifting
 
txhokie4life's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 2,138
Received 75 Likes on 59 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Salespunk
Since I live in the land of EV's I have spoken to a lot of people about this issue. Their response is that they changed their driving habits slightly during road trips. They said their stops are much more relaxing now since they are not always rushing to get back on the road as quickly as possible. There is time to get out of the car, eat, stretch a little and then get back on the road. I am still a little skeptical, but makes sense to me in a lot of ways.
This would make my wife happy and drive me nuts :-)

Looks like I'll be Taycan :-)

Or better yet -- I'll haul the Spec Boxster behind the RV -- and she'll drive the Taycan -- and she'll blow by me every few hours after I catch her while she's "refilling"!

M
Old 06-19-2018, 12:07 AM
  #42  
niche
Drifting
 
niche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Oceanside, CA
Posts: 3,344
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

I just did a three state road trip in our Tesla... Not the way to do a road trip.
Old 06-19-2018, 11:17 AM
  #43  
tstafford
Race Car
 
tstafford's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Nashville
Posts: 4,483
Received 1,080 Likes on 619 Posts
Default

Right now EV's are pretty terrible road trip cars. Driving my Tesla adds about 20% to the drive time for any trip that requires charging - that's a lot. Will certainly be worse in an EV that doesn't benefit from the extensive Tesla charging network.
Old 06-19-2018, 01:39 PM
  #44  
unclewill
Racer
Thread Starter
 
unclewill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 279
Received 76 Likes on 35 Posts
Default

An ICE powered vehicle is at its most efficient under steady state conditions such as extended highway slogs - EVs are best in stop and start within a bounded area (Range/2).
Old 06-19-2018, 05:02 PM
  #45  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,295
Received 3,600 Likes on 1,757 Posts
Default

I mostly agree with Uncle will's statement - I find EV's most effective if you limit your fast charging stops to 1 or 2 a day - anything more than that makes it a slog - but no one should fear a road trip with one fast charging stop along the way - once you are planning 2 or more stops per day the EV charging penalty really starts to kick in on over all trip time.

1 stop is no big deal and some what refreshing.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Range anxiety is a fallacy



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 09:43 PM.