Notices
Taycan 2019-Current The Electric Porsche
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

First Production Spy Photos

Old 10-08-2017, 04:46 AM
  #31  
Cloudplay
Instructor
 
Cloudplay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 105
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by lowpue
I am so with you on this....I was going to buy one but not if it looks so similar to the fouyr door today. Really disappointing. The concept was spectacular and I was willing to pay $200K for that thing. Now with the spy shots, 85K is far too much.
The basic proportions are right there. Gained some ground clearance, (presumably) lost the suicide doors and the front fenders are closer to the other production models. Without camo it's going to be great, if not quite as stunning as the concept. Looks like a pretty nice $85k car to me.


Old 10-08-2017, 06:25 AM
  #32  
pete95zhn
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
pete95zhn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: fortistuning.fi
Posts: 2,271
Received 99 Likes on 55 Posts
Default

^^^ Proportions are the same, but all exciting is replaced by boredom.
__________________
Pete

Power. Lots is good, more is better, too much is just right...

'87 951, RIP
'00 996 C2 L92U AQ / IXAA IXRB IX54 M96/7.xx G96/7.88 M030 M375 M376 M436 M476 M601 M983 ... + 991 GT3 brakes, 997 GT3 sway bars, fully monoball'd suspension, Bilstein Cup Car coilovers, do88 Big Pack ICs. 10 & 12 x 19" BBS CH-R wheels with 265/30 & 325 /30 -19 MPSC2s.



Old 10-08-2017, 03:20 PM
  #33  
tcbrown
Instructor
 
tcbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I think we are all hoping that the production car is as close to the concept as possible. One key element is the elimination of the B pillar. Porsche said this online:
"In one area, however, carbon is the optimal choice: in the so-called ‘Weissach Frame’, the passenger compartment formed as a carbon monocoque. Extremely light, and yet so stable that there is no need for the B-pillar."
This is likely critical to the interior layout, structural integrity of the car, weight and cost. I hope they can pull it off.
Old 10-09-2017, 02:39 AM
  #34  
Nicole
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Nicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Silly Valley, CA
Posts: 25,780
Received 149 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by nwGTS
Looks like a panamera body. prob just testing the drive train. This car's production facility and panel tooling isn't even built yet.
Do you really think Porsche doesn't start building prototypes of a car before the production facilities are complete?

How do you think Tesla built the Model 3 examples that they showed more than a year ago?
Old 10-09-2017, 11:40 AM
  #35  
Keadog
Rennlist Member
 
Keadog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,788
Received 1,010 Likes on 607 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Nicole

How do you think Tesla built the Model 3 examples that they showed more than a year ago?
Apparently by hand at less than the 3/day they are making now.
On Mars.
Old 10-09-2017, 12:04 PM
  #36  
phow
Pro
 
phow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 577
Received 200 Likes on 108 Posts
Default

I had a feeling when the base price was announced to be 85k, it may lose some of the specialness we saw in the concept. Porsche is trying to compete directly with Tesla and I have no doubt that I would rather still own this over a Model S when it is finally revealed. I just think the margin by how much more I would rather own the Porsche over the Tesla has dramatically shrunk.
Old 10-09-2017, 03:20 PM
  #37  
stealthpilot
Three Wheelin'
 
stealthpilot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 1,437
Received 132 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Cloudplay
The basic proportions are right there. Gained some ground clearance, (presumably) lost the suicide doors and the front fenders are closer to the other production models. Without camo it's going to be great, if not quite as stunning as the concept. Looks like a pretty nice $85k car to me.


Agree it looks stunning.

Suicide doors would have been nice, but we all know they add a lot of weight because of the advanced locking mechanism needed to meet NHTSA guidelines. So they probably made the right call here.

I am super excited about this car.













Old 10-09-2017, 05:48 PM
  #38  
tcbrown
Instructor
 
tcbrown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 119
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

I'll be really disappointed if the bean counters win out and make this a small electrically powered Panamera in an attempt to compete with Tesla.
This should be a statement car, something that stirs the blood, not just a rehashed Audi or VW.
Old 10-09-2017, 07:07 PM
  #39  
Archimedes
Race Director
 
Archimedes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 13,163
Received 3,857 Likes on 1,901 Posts
Default

That 3/4 rear side view from street level above looks awesome. You really get a look at the shape of the primary elements of the car without the camo ruining it and it looks great. That view of the front fenders shows a great line.

If they put the right wheels on this (hint: 5 spokes Porsche!), it's going to look beastly. Also, I think when they remove that camo from the headlights, the front end is going to look great.
Old 10-10-2017, 12:22 PM
  #40  
OverBoosted28
Rennlist Member
 
OverBoosted28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Central California
Posts: 3,484
Likes: 0
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

Sad. It now resembles a slicked down Panamera. Of course it'll be an incredible car, just not incredibly beautiful.
Old 10-10-2017, 04:05 PM
  #41  
daveo4porsche
Rennlist Member
 
daveo4porsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Santa Cruz, CA
Posts: 5,295
Received 3,600 Likes on 1,757 Posts
Default

from the photos it looks like they need 4 Mission E's to compete with one Tesla Model s and Model X ;-)

that's about the right ratio...
Old 10-10-2017, 09:08 PM
  #42  
skiahh
Rennlist Member
 
skiahh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Fruita, CO
Posts: 3,164
Received 129 Likes on 93 Posts
Default

I love how everyone wails and gnashes their teeth about every new disguised prototype photo posted yet when the final model comes out, there's only a few naysayers left. I suspect it'll be pretty much the same here.

And I have to wonder, how many futuristic concept cars have made it to market "as-is"? I don't recall too many. If all the cool concept cars made it to production as they were originally shown, we'd have some pretty cool cars prowling the roads. Yet, most are tamed for production purposes, for a variety of reasons, I suspect. As noted, safety rules, first and foremost. Economy of scale would be another... to share parts between similar models. And finally, not all of the buying public are enthusiasts, so they have to make a more "centralist" car to get more than just the "I'd pay 200K for that!" buyers interested.

Another thing that might be requiring 4 testers... maybe there is a gas powered option here, too. The mid-sized Panny, if you will, to slot in with the 5 Series and E Class. I'm not holding my breath, but it's possible....
Old 10-11-2017, 01:21 AM
  #43  
Nicole
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Nicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Silly Valley, CA
Posts: 25,780
Received 149 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by skiahh
Another thing that might be requiring 4 testers... maybe there is a gas powered option here, too. The mid-sized Panny, if you will, to slot in with the 5 Series and E Class. I'm not holding my breath, but it's possible....
Definitely, 100% not. The architecture would not accommodate an internal combustion engine.

I agree with you in everything else you said. Once packaging, safety, manufacturing processes and cost, etc. are considered, most concept cars have to be altered heavily. The concept is only the dream. Production is brutal reality.
Old 10-12-2017, 01:18 AM
  #44  
aualexa2
Rennlist Member
 
aualexa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 956
Received 50 Likes on 28 Posts
Default

Is there camo over the b-pillar in the photos? It seems like the b-pillar is solid. There's no line down the center where the door would open. For a comparison, I've attached a picture of the sport turismo where you clearly see a line in the center.

I'm still holding out hope for suicide doors.
Attached Images  
Old 10-12-2017, 05:15 AM
  #45  
Nicole
Cottage Industry Sponsor
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Nicole's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Silly Valley, CA
Posts: 25,780
Received 149 Likes on 80 Posts
Default

Perhaps frameless windows like Tesla.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: First Production Spy Photos



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:28 AM.