Notices
911 Forum 1964-1989
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: Intercity Lines, LLC

Attempting to buy a 3.2,having second thoughts

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-13-2018, 10:32 PM
  #1  
ksluna
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ksluna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: TX
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default Attempting to buy a 3.2,having second thoughts

Hi all,

So I am pretty much dead set on an air-cooled porsche. I've settled on the 3.2 or the 993, although I think the 3.2 speaks more to me and is the car I'd end up being more happy with, I called Tim Holt to ask about some 3.2s he had and pretty much he suggested I go with the 993.

55K is my budget and pretty much what Tim said is that all his 3.2s are the high 60s to 90s and the reason being is because of the low mileage. He suggested the 993 because the 3.2 has worn valve guides at 100K and produces probably only 70% of it's power as they get higher mileage. Not sure how true that is but it was disheartening.

I know you don't adjust the valves on a 993, but with a 3.2 is there a "fix" for the valve guide issue or do you just care for and adjust them every 10k miles (as I've read)?

What I'm looking for in this next car is just a fun raw experience. I have a reliable DD and I do not care about A/C, cabin noise, or amenities. I want a raw, air-cooled, 911 driving experience. From what I've read, the 3.2 offers this while the 993 was a step forward in modernization and isn't as "raw". However, for those who have driven both a 3.2 and a 993, is it similar in that sense?
Old 12-14-2018, 12:25 AM
  #2  
fastdiablo
Burning Brakes
 
fastdiablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 903
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

You rebuild the 3.2 as you lose compression. Often around 80k miles+ depending on how the motor was cared for etc. heads get machined, valve guides and new head studs etc. $10-14k in work once you do the clutch, sound pad, cap and rotor, fuel lines -everything you need to do while the motor is out being rebuilt. Once that work is done you know exactly what you have, and that's worth a lot.
I rebuilt my 88 right when I bought it right at 96k miles because one of the cylinders wasn't holding good compression during the PPI. I negotiated the price down accordingly. I added new Elephant suspension, did the rebuild and that car and motor friggen rips -also good for another 100k reliable miles..
I love the G body as a first air-cooled 911. So amazingly iconic, full analog, amazing sound and driving experience. Owned mine almost two years and I still get up early almost every single weekend for a fast rip through the canyons before the world wakes up. I also have a new 911 GTS, people don't even notice it -the 3.2 people always wave, thumbs up, comment and take pics. It's just a fun car to own.
Get a rare color if possible -I found my marine blue metallic 88 and fell in love -had to have it.
Also, G50 if you can find it and it's in your budget. I'd argue a 100k mile car that needs a rebuild but has good interior and paint is a good buy if you negotiate all the work etc. do it right and you're sub $65k all in. They are cheap cars to maintain once you rebuild them and fix the little issues you'll inevitably have with a 30 year old car.
The PPI from an air cooled specialist will be your best negotiation tool. Don't skimp. Good luck!
Attached Images  

Last edited by fastdiablo; 12-14-2018 at 01:55 AM.
Old 12-14-2018, 01:46 AM
  #3  
ksluna
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ksluna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: TX
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Thanks fastdiablo! that car looks beautiful. So from what I can tell is that after a nice rebuild the 3.2 should be good to go for quite some time? Just to clarify, as you said you rebuilt it as it loses compression, is the engine just prone to losing compression as time goes by, or does a rebuild resolve that?
Old 12-14-2018, 02:03 AM
  #4  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,333
Received 5,482 Likes on 2,269 Posts
Default

993 also have their issues and cost more to fix.
I prefer G body and specially 915 box.
Old 12-14-2018, 08:01 AM
  #5  
Mark Salvetti
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
Mark Salvetti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 1,316
Received 184 Likes on 145 Posts
Default

The other risk starting to crop up on the 3.2’s is broken lower head studs. Much more common on the 3.0 engines, but it seems the 3.2’s are not immune. Usually you find this when doing a valve adjustment. Take the lower valve cover off and a barrel nut with stud falls out.

Since the heads need to come off to fix it, most people at least do a top end rebuild and check that the cylinders are in spec.

It’s age as much as mileage, so even a low-mileage car should be checked for this during the PPI, along with rust in the usual places.

But don’t let this scare you off. As mooty said, the 993’s have issues too. Ask some questions and browse the 993 forum.

Mark
Old 12-14-2018, 09:30 AM
  #6  
Bill Verburg
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Bill Verburg's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2001
Posts: 12,255
Received 512 Likes on 352 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ksluna
Hi all,

So I am pretty much dead set on an air-cooled porsche. I've settled on the 3.2 or the 993, although I think the 3.2 speaks more to me and is the car I'd end up being more happy with, I called Tim Holt to ask about some 3.2s he had and pretty much he suggested I go with the 993.

55K is my budget and pretty much what Tim said is that all his 3.2s are the high 60s to 90s and the reason being is because of the low mileage. He suggested the 993 because the 3.2 has worn valve guides at 100K and produces probably only 70% of it's power as they get higher mileage. Not sure how true that is but it was disheartening.

I know you don't adjust the valves on a 993, but with a 3.2 is there a "fix" for the valve guide issue or do you just care for and adjust them every 10k miles (as I've read)?

What I'm looking for in this next car is just a fun raw experience. I have a reliable DD and I do not care about A/C, cabin noise, or amenities. I want a raw, air-cooled, 911 driving experience. From what I've read, the 3.2 offers this while the 993 was a step forward in modernization and isn't as "raw". However, for those who have driven both a 3.2 and a 993, is it similar in that sense?
Stock, neither is particularly 'raw', Modified either can be made as 'raw' as you want. valve guide wear has been an issue on all air cooled since day1, right up through 993s, the cure is a valve job w/ Phosphor-Bronze guides.

performance wise the 993 has more potential but looks are often the deciding factor, especially in the street environment
Old 12-14-2018, 03:19 PM
  #7  
myflat6
Drifting
 
myflat6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA & Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,165
Received 191 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Bill Verburg
Stock, neither is particularly 'raw', Modified either can be made as 'raw' as you want. valve guide wear has been an issue on all air cooled since day 1, right up through 993s, the cure is a valve job w/ Phosphor-Bronze guides.

performance wise the 993 has more potential but looks are often the deciding factor, especially in the street environment
Just to add a bit to Bill's response about valve guides and 993's - the real difference is that the wear leads to issues with the SAI Emissions system, which causes emission check failures. If you are not in a state that requires emissions tests on cars of this age - it isn't a huge deal, but it can be in states like CA. I really enjoy my 993 - it is very difficult to compare this car to any of the torsion bar cars in my opinion - it's roots are in the air cooled vintage, but it shows evolution. I agree with Mooty's comment about the 915 if you get a G-body - I really enjoy my other cars with the 915 - a very different experience than the G50 in my 993 - both great, but both very different. To me, the 915 suites the air-cooled driving character more so than the G50 - which shifts much more like a Honda (smooth and refined) than a vintage Porsche.
Old 12-14-2018, 04:35 PM
  #8  
fastdiablo
Burning Brakes
 
fastdiablo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 903
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

You can also save a good bit of money buying a 915 car as they are considered less desirable and don't command the G50 premium. Can def help w budget constraints!
Old 12-14-2018, 05:30 PM
  #9  
ksluna
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ksluna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: TX
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Thanks for all the info. I personally would not mind a 915 3.2.

One of the main things I'm concerned about a 993 is that all the advances in it just means more things to go wrong. I'm a youtube mechanic, lol. I don't mind learning how to do basic maintenance and easy fixes, but I don't have too much of an interest in being a full time mechanic. From what I've read on multiple threads is that the 3.2 is the most bullet proof engine out of the air-cooled engines...
Old 12-14-2018, 06:49 PM
  #10  
Freddie Two Bs
Drifting
 
Freddie Two Bs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 3,256
Received 462 Likes on 294 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ksluna
From what I've read on multiple threads is that the 3.2 is the most bullet proof engine out of the air-cooled engines...
The 3.0 on the SC is probably more bulletproof, once the head studs are done.
Old 12-14-2018, 06:55 PM
  #11  
ksluna
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
ksluna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: TX
Posts: 83
Likes: 0
Received 8 Likes on 7 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by rick brooklyn
The 3.0 on the SC is probably more bulletproof, once the head studs are done.
Mainly wanted the 3.2 due to the upgraded fuel injection system! though SC prices are very attractive
Old 12-14-2018, 08:28 PM
  #12  
911S3.6
Pro
 
911S3.6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: in the Hinterland
Posts: 526
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ksluna
Thanks for all the info. I personally would not mind a 915 3.2.

One of the main things I'm concerned about a 993 is that all the advances in it just means more things to go wrong. I'm a youtube mechanic, lol. I don't mind learning how to do basic maintenance and easy fixes, but I don't have too much of an interest in being a full time mechanic. From what I've read on multiple threads is that the 3.2 is the most bullet proof engine out of the air-cooled engines...
The 993 era 3.6 twin plug motor is a lot harder to access due to space constraints in the engine compartment compared to the Carrera 3.2. Even changing the air filter.
Also with twin plugs you have two distributors, rotors, twice as many plugs... routing new plug wires on the 3.6 is a PIA due to accessibility [ unless engine is out].
3.2 is way more user friendly for those who want to tinker. Not as much power but great motor. And they go forever if you are judicious with maintenance, oil changes ....


Old 12-14-2018, 08:52 PM
  #13  
myflat6
Drifting
 
myflat6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Orange County, CA & Tucson, AZ
Posts: 2,165
Received 191 Likes on 123 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 911S3.6
The 993 era 3.6 twin plug motor is a lot harder to access due to space constraints in the engine compartment compared to the Carrera 3.2. Even changing the air filter.
Also with twin plugs you have two distributors, rotors, twice as many plugs... routing new plug wires on the 3.6 is a PIA due to accessibility [ unless engine is out].
3.2 is way more user friendly for those who want to tinker. Not as much power but great motor. And they go forever if you are judicious with maintenance, oil changes ....
Funny you mention this - it is true - even replacing my spark plugs and wires was a PITA! Now, there is lots of space around my 2.4

There is so much to love about the 3.6 though
Old 12-15-2018, 01:29 AM
  #14  
Bford100
Rennlist Member
 
Bford100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calif.
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

I love my '86 Targa. Bought it 2 years ago, had 55K miles. My hobby is to rebuild things. So I did. Engine, trans, full suspension to OEM spec. So much fun!




Old 12-15-2018, 01:35 AM
  #15  
Bford100
Rennlist Member
 
Bford100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Calif.
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 53 Likes on 26 Posts
Default

Oh....forgot the 915 rebuild, smooth as butter now...




Quick Reply: Attempting to buy a 3.2,having second thoughts



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:55 PM.