Notices
991 2012-2019
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Lord, is the 991.2 a fast car!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2016, 04:50 PM
  #1  
neurotic
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
neurotic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,407
Received 565 Likes on 268 Posts
Default Lord, is the 991.2 a fast car!



Around Willow Springs, the 991.2 is quicker than a 991.1 GT3 AND a 991.1 Turbo S! Wow. Can't wait to see what the .2 GT3 will have to offer
Old 10-05-2016, 05:02 PM
  #2  
Joec500
Rennlist Member
 
Joec500's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,969
Received 998 Likes on 592 Posts
Default

WOW...I am really surprised in those results because both the 991 Turbo S and GT3 have 4WS and more powerful motors.

I wonder where the speed comes from.
Old 10-05-2016, 05:34 PM
  #3  
Quadcammer
Race Director
 
Quadcammer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Clifton, NJ
Posts: 15,638
Received 1,379 Likes on 798 Posts
Default

unpossible. Turbo cars suck, they have horrific lag, they are terrible for the track, they are only good in a straight line.
Old 10-05-2016, 05:34 PM
  #4  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,153
Received 2,194 Likes on 1,008 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joec500
WOW...I am really surprised in those results because both the 991 Turbo S and GT3 have 4WS and more powerful motors.

I wonder where the speed comes from.

The 991.2S had 4WS as well......
Old 10-05-2016, 05:43 PM
  #5  
Ynot
Three Wheelin'
 
Ynot's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,471
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

The 991.2 is a beast, it's a very fast and capable car. Plenty of low end torque, feels very naturally aspirated.
Old 10-05-2016, 06:01 PM
  #6  
-Ryan-
Pro
 
-Ryan-'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Palm Springs
Posts: 500
Received 29 Likes on 19 Posts
Default

How is the Turbo S slower? All that additional weight must be costly.

I'm curious as to the future of the GT cars. I think they are going to have to go turbo to stay ahead of the non-GTs.
Old 10-05-2016, 06:06 PM
  #7  
9914s
Rennlist Member
 
9914s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Wellington FL
Posts: 1,324
Received 259 Likes on 142 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Joec500
WOW...I am really surprised in those results because both the 991 Turbo S and GT3 have 4WS and more powerful motors.

I wonder where the speed comes from.
Not taking anything away from the .2 but drivers and weather can make a huge difference.
Old 10-05-2016, 06:10 PM
  #8  
Needsdecaf
RL Community Team
Rennlist Member
 
Needsdecaf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: The Woodlands, TX.
Posts: 8,862
Received 2,565 Likes on 1,597 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 9914s
Not taking anything away from the .2 but drivers and weather can make a huge difference.
I believe these are all times set by Randy Pobst.

And weather...this is California we're talking about.

Having driven a .2 C2, back to back with a .1 C2S, my thoughts were: man, the turbo really makes up for the fact that it's not a Carrera S; the .2 Carrera S must be a rocket and secondly, the .2 seemed a LOT more planted and stable than the .1. Although to be honest, I kind of like the old school feeling of the .1 vs. the .2.
Old 10-05-2016, 06:21 PM
  #9  
subshooter
Rennlist Member
 
subshooter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: New Orleans, LA (NOLA)
Posts: 5,153
Received 2,194 Likes on 1,008 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Needsdecaf
I believe these are all times set by Randy Pobst.

And weather...this is California we're talking about.

Having driven a .2 C2, back to back with a .1 C2S, my thoughts were: man, the turbo really makes up for the fact that it's not a Carrera S; the .2 Carrera S must be a rocket and secondly, the .2 seemed a LOT more planted and stable than the .1. Although to be honest, I kind of like the old school feeling of the .1 vs. the .2.

I've driven the .1 C2S and .2 C2S on the track and the .2 C2 on the street. I love them all. I wouldn't kick any of them out of bed.......unless they were better on the floor.
Old 10-05-2016, 06:47 PM
  #10  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,733
Received 3,582 Likes on 2,331 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by -Ryan-
How is the Turbo S slower? All that additional weight must be costly.

I'm curious as to the future of the GT cars. I think they are going to have to go turbo to stay ahead of the non-GTs.
only reinforces my thoughts about the .2 GTS if/when it shows up and also the .2 GT3 ... gotta have the 4.0L and PDK (at least as an option along with the R's 6MT and LWFW)
Old 10-05-2016, 06:49 PM
  #11  
GregD
Racer
 
GregD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: SF north bay
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

..and the Vette beat it by .75 seconds ! Ouch, that said the tires make it an unfair fight...
Old 10-05-2016, 06:51 PM
  #12  
Larry Cable
Rennlist Member
 
Larry Cable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: S.F Bay Area
Posts: 25,733
Received 3,582 Likes on 2,331 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GregD
..and the Vette beat it by .75 seconds ! Ouch, that said the tires make it an unfair fight...
good point about the rubber, that could account for .75 right there ... especially on a fast track like this:

Old 10-05-2016, 07:03 PM
  #13  
neanicu
Nordschleife Master
 
neanicu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Ny
Posts: 9,969
Received 350 Likes on 212 Posts
Default

Porsche's main focus from a marketing perspective is to make each new gen faster. The way the industry is going,I don't see how they could come out with a car that has the same power levels as the old gen and be just as fast or even slower. I personally could care less about their numbers and power levels,all I care is how I feel when I get behind the wheel. If I like it then it's mine. I've had it with fast fast fast...fast until what point? The limit has been pretty much reached or close to it. On the street at least...it's where these cars spend most of their time. So why do we buy into " fast "? Pure marketing is why...
It's the same reason why cars that try to use a healthy concept from the driver's perspective like the Cayman GT4 or 911R will continue to win awards,because a good car is not only about " fast ".
Old 10-05-2016, 07:26 PM
  #14  
neurotic
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
neurotic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 3,407
Received 565 Likes on 268 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by neanicu
Porsche's main focus from a marketing perspective is to make each new gen faster. The way the industry is going,I don't see how they could come out with a car that has the same power levels as the old gen and be just as fast or even slower. I personally could care less about their numbers and power levels,all I care is how I feel when I get behind the wheel. If I like it then it's mine. I've had it with fast fast fast...fast until what point? The limit has been pretty much reached or close to it. On the street at least...it's where these cars spend most of their time. So why do we buy into " fast "? Pure marketing is why...
It's the same reason why cars that try to use a healthy concept from the driver's perspective like the Cayman GT4 or 911R will continue to win awards,because a good car is not only about " fast ".
110% in agreement with you. I would never get rid of my .1 for a .2 no matter how fast it is. It is fast enough for me and I will never get bored of it.....
Old 10-05-2016, 08:21 PM
  #15  
bluehorseshoe
Rennlist Member
 
bluehorseshoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Fairfield County, CT
Posts: 1,767
Received 445 Likes on 179 Posts
Default

Porsche engineers scratching their heads, getting beat by Corvette! Cheap American car. Haha. Thought GT3RS could've beat them all.


Quick Reply: Lord, is the 991.2 a fast car!



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 06:29 PM.