GT3RS canada news
#1
Banned
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
base price 171,200
LWFW
carbon wing and hood
no sunroof
wider fenders a la C4S
split rear wishbones
44 pounds less than GT3
NO CGT SEATS, ROLLBAR OR LEXAN REAR WINDOW
production starting early 2007 and apparently is extremely limited.
who thinks its worth it?
LWFW
carbon wing and hood
no sunroof
wider fenders a la C4S
split rear wishbones
44 pounds less than GT3
NO CGT SEATS, ROLLBAR OR LEXAN REAR WINDOW
production starting early 2007 and apparently is extremely limited.
who thinks its worth it?
#3
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by NOBLEGT3
base price 171,200
LWFW
carbon wing and hood
no sunroof
wider fenders a la C4S
split rear wishbones
44 pounds less than GT3
NO CGT SEATS, ROLLBAR OR LEXAN REAR WINDOW
production starting early 2007 and apparently is extremely limited.
who thinks its worth it?
LWFW
carbon wing and hood
no sunroof
wider fenders a la C4S
split rear wishbones
44 pounds less than GT3
NO CGT SEATS, ROLLBAR OR LEXAN REAR WINDOW
production starting early 2007 and apparently is extremely limited.
who thinks its worth it?
![ooops](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon501.gif)
Jokes aside; I was reading panorama this morning and for 20K or so more over the GT3, I would really try to put the fuss with sunroof aside and think with my wallet. Not much diff between the two and you can do alot with 20K on a GT3.
#4
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
What, no sunroof? wtf.
#5
Banned
Thread Starter
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CWay27
Extremely limited like the GT2 or maybe even more limited like the CGT
Jokes aside; I was reading panorama this morning and for 20K or so more over the GT3, I would really try to put the fuss with sunroof aside and think with my wallet. Not much diff between the two and you can do alot with 20K on a GT3.
![ooops](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/icon501.gif)
Jokes aside; I was reading panorama this morning and for 20K or so more over the GT3, I would really try to put the fuss with sunroof aside and think with my wallet. Not much diff between the two and you can do alot with 20K on a GT3.
#7
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by theedge
No sunroof? ![Frown](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
![Frown](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/frown.gif)
GT3 RS = No sunroof.
If we give the sunroof issue a rest, the only other diffenrences between them are the LWFW (RS is single mass and GT3 is dual), carbon rear spolier and rear hips 1.44" or so wider.
Tranny and motor are the same and I assume because of the weight reduction , that's where the RS gets .1 sec faster on 0-60MPH.
It all comes down to what it's worth to you. People are still today bashing on the RS America has being just a C2 and not a real RS. So imagine this one....
If I were in the market for this kind of car, I would most probably go with a GT3 but I must admit that every time I see a signal green RS, I get a little excited.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CWay27
GT3 = no choice, you get the hole in the roof.
GT3 RS = No sunroof.
If we give the sunroof issue a rest, the only other diffenrences between them are the LWFW (RS is single mass and GT3 is dual), carbon rear spolier and rear hips 1.44" or so wider.
Tranny and motor are the same and I assume because of the weight reduction , that's where the RS gets .1 sec faster on 0-60MPH.
It all comes down to what it's worth to you. People are still today bashing on the RS America has being just a C2 and not a real RS. So imagine this one....
If I were in the market for this kind of car, I would most probably go with a GT3 but I must admit that every time I see a signal green RS, I get a little excited.
GT3 RS = No sunroof.
If we give the sunroof issue a rest, the only other diffenrences between them are the LWFW (RS is single mass and GT3 is dual), carbon rear spolier and rear hips 1.44" or so wider.
Tranny and motor are the same and I assume because of the weight reduction , that's where the RS gets .1 sec faster on 0-60MPH.
It all comes down to what it's worth to you. People are still today bashing on the RS America has being just a C2 and not a real RS. So imagine this one....
If I were in the market for this kind of car, I would most probably go with a GT3 but I must admit that every time I see a signal green RS, I get a little excited.
#9
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by NinetyOneC2
how often do you see a signal green RS? I don't think I've ever seen one! Or do you mean the pictures of the new one...in which case I agree!
#10
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by CWay27
Fore sure pictures, internet, video etc.
#11
Rennlist Member
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Montreal, Canada
Posts: 3,854
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by NinetyOneC2
Ah. I thought you might have meant the last gen car but I didn't think it was offered in any colours other than white...nor was it sold in Canada.
#12
Drifting
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
I dont think it would be worth it to me. Having an RS would be awesome. Very unique, different than the 100s of other 911s we all see each day, but lets be honest, it would be largely because of the wing and the graphics. Aside from the visual experience, I bet it is really not that much different than a GT3.
$20k is A LOT of track tires and brake pads.
For me, it would be GT3 or Turbo. Heart would say GT3, wife and kids would say Turbo.
$20k is A LOT of track tires and brake pads.
For me, it would be GT3 or Turbo. Heart would say GT3, wife and kids would say Turbo.
#13
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by BioBanker
it would be largely because of the wing and the graphics.
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
If the RS wing and graphics can be ordered as an option for the regular GT3, I don't think any potential RS buyers will still pay more money for the RS.
#15
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Targa Tim
You are right on!
If the RS wing and graphics can be ordered as an option for the regular GT3, I don't think any potential RS buyers will still pay more money for the RS.
![thumbup](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/thumbup.gif)
If the RS wing and graphics can be ordered as an option for the regular GT3, I don't think any potential RS buyers will still pay more money for the RS.
The wing and graphics you will probably be able to buy for a GT-3, the widebody (and wider rear track) and lack of a sunroof you can't. If your pockets are deep enough, and you just don't want a sunroof, then an RS it will be. A "base" GT-3 with $20K in mods should be faster than a stock RS, but nothing says you can't mod the RS either.