Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

DE versus racing. What is your experience?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-28-2016, 04:15 PM
  #46  
JP66
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
 
JP66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 847
Received 142 Likes on 70 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
Man, I have raced for thirty years (and won more than 200 races) and I have NEVER destroyed my (or anyone elses) car. I DON'T think that is inevitable. It does suck to crash, however, and I have done that...
That is great to hear! I'd hate to think that "destroying" a car is inevitable although I will admit I bought an SP2 car as my first race car just so the pain of losing it (not that I plan on that!) would be bearable.
Old 06-28-2016, 04:26 PM
  #47  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,836 Likes on 1,670 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ExMB
I'm agreeing with docwyte here. That doesn't leave a lot of time to download video and review the session with a student.

Having only 1 student may make it possible if its equipment I'm familiar with.

If we are going to that extent, I believe the student needs to hire someone to get undivided attention.
I agree with docwyte on his in-car priorities. I am not suggesting instructors take the time, unless they have the time.

I just don't agree you need a "racing coach" (or a racing venue) to WANT (and get) a few more tenths. A good instructor, teaching effectively, can impart and refine the skills, knowledge and execution prompts to do just that!

I REALLY don't agree with those that ARE trying to "find time" necessarily compromise the DE environment, as long as they follow the rules and the culture. That's all.

Originally Posted by LuigiVampa
Somehow wanting to go racing is treated like a sin by many DE organizations.

CVR was supportive and even gave me instructors who had racing experience to do ride alongs once I was in white and deemed "ready".

It is a shame that it doesn't happen but I think racing should be discussed among the higher run group levels.
Agreed. And that s how the most progressive regions do it. Like CVR.

On the latter, there are more and more clubs and individual regions that are bringing in folks like Peter A., Ross and I to talk specifically to higher (including instructor) run groups about advanced technique and, dare I say it, "racecraft."

The shame is that I have heard this year, more than any time in the past, frustration by black and red drivers who share that "once they're solo status, the mentoring, continuing education and development resources stop."

Originally Posted by JP66
What I think I have learned is to treat DEs as cheap seat/track time and simply enjoy the new friends I make and time I spend on track, but I will not expect that every DE instructor I get is going to be teaching me how to race.

In fact, now I will expect just the opposite. I expect my DE coach to teach me about car control and show me a safe line at a new track.
Accurate assessment and a more realistic expectation.

IMO, it's not optimal for some DE organizers, staff and instructors to scorn the mention of "racing." This "line of separation" can be cast in a positive light, not in the current, prevailing negative light.

Originally Posted by sbelles
The racing line is wherever to have to put the car to get through traffic. I've had a couple of students who really didn't have a clue how to compensate if they have to go off the line that they have been taught they have to keep to. For newbies I teach a somewhat safer (later apex) line then I might take but there isn't a whole lot of difference. I also encourage them to go offline once in a while so that they understand how and why they have to change inputs due to different lines.
I misunderstood, then. That's NOT what I call the "racing line." That's the "passing line."

The "racing line" to me is the quickest, most efficient and geometrically least challenging to the maintenance of momentum and progressive application of throttle. Turn in is often earlier than the "DE" or "school" line, apexes are longer and generally, all of the width of the road is used, unless otherwise indicated. It's what you do to try and drive "the perfect lap."

And THAT GOAL doesn't know the difference between DE and racing...
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway






















Old 06-28-2016, 05:14 PM
  #48  
sbelles
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
 
sbelles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Here some and there some
Posts: 12,092
Received 247 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach

I misunderstood, then. That's NOT what I call the "racing line." That's the "passing line."

The "racing line" to me is the quickest, most efficient and geometrically least challenging to the maintenance of momentum and progressive application of throttle. Turn in is often earlier than the "DE" or "school" line, apexes are longer and generally, all of the width of the road is used, unless otherwise indicated. It's what you do to try and drive "the perfect lap."

And THAT GOAL doesn't know the difference between DE and racing...
Yes, that was my point too. There is no difference except that DE students often have it drilled into them that there is only one line for all circumstances.
Old 06-28-2016, 05:21 PM
  #49  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,836 Likes on 1,670 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sbelles
Yes, that was my point too. There is no difference except that DE students often have it drilled into them that there is only one line for all circumstances.
Got it. Thanks, and agree with that observation.

It's a shame that so many "advanced" students and instructors are needing to "unlearn" the stepped process most DE programs teach. That goes for line, straight-line versus trail-braking, braking technique in general, ad infinitum...
Old 06-28-2016, 05:35 PM
  #50  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,399
Received 1,314 Likes on 799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
I agree with docwyte on his in-car priorities. I am not suggesting instructors take the time, unless they have the time.

I just don't agree you need a "racing coach" (or a racing venue) to WANT (and get) a few more tenths. A good instructor, teaching effectively, can impart and refine the skills, knowledge and execution prompts to do just that!

I REALLY don't agree with those that ARE trying to "find time" necessarily compromise the DE environment, as long as they follow the rules and the culture. That's all.
The way it came across to me was different than your corrections now which was the "for hire" reference I made. You are correct that a student can move to an advanced instructor for refinement, but to expect it as a blanket statement is incorrect. Students in a DE environment will progress if they listen, pay attention, etc, etc. during their time with their instructor. But your comment about instructors needing to take the time to learn about the new data stuff available and using it with a student was taking it too far IMHO (you didn't choose to quote that in your reply). That expectation I reserve for a "for hire" instructor instead of a "volunteer". IMHO students will pay more attention to an instructor if they have a financial involvement beyond the event fee when compared to none.
Old 06-28-2016, 05:35 PM
  #51  
sbelles
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
 
sbelles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Here some and there some
Posts: 12,092
Received 247 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
Got it. Thanks, and agree with that observation.

It's a shame that so many "advanced" students and instructors are needing to "unlearn" the stepped process most DE programs teach. That goes for line, straight-line versus trail-braking, braking technique in general, ad infinitum...
Yep, and most have to learn those "advanced" techniques on their own since they will never see a classroom or even have an instructor once they are signed off to a solo group. I'd like to see more focus on actually teaching advanced students.
Old 06-28-2016, 05:54 PM
  #52  
winders
Race Car
 
winders's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: San Martin, CA
Posts: 4,472
Received 762 Likes on 385 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
I misunderstood, then. That's NOT what I call the "racing line." That's the "passing line."

The "racing line" to me is the quickest, most efficient and geometrically least challenging to the maintenance of momentum and progressive application of throttle. Turn in is often earlier than the "DE" or "school" line, apexes are longer and generally, all of the width of the road is used, unless otherwise indicated. It's what you do to try and drive "the perfect lap."

And THAT GOAL doesn't know the difference between DE and racing...
Originally Posted by sbelles
Yes, that was my point too. There is no difference except that DE students often have it drilled into them that there is only one line for all circumstances.
Doesn't that depend where a student is in the DE cycle and what their skill level is? I know when I used to instruct at motorcycle Rider's Ed events I tended to teach a more conservative line (later apex than I would qualify on) with more room for error to students whose skill level was not relatively high. I mean the goal is different at different levels, right?

Of course, when I instructed new motorcycle racers coming up from the Rider's Ed ranks, the hardest thing to drill out of their heads was that damn late apex Rider's Ed line. Second most difficult was getting them to actively practice on non-standard lines so they new what to expect from the track when they had to go fast on parts the track not normally used in Rider's Ed.
Old 06-28-2016, 06:00 PM
  #53  
Veloce Raptor
Rennlist Member
 
Veloce Raptor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Guess...
Posts: 41,647
Received 1,414 Likes on 755 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sbelles
Yep, and most have to learn those "advanced" techniques on their own since they will never see a classroom or even have an instructor once they are signed off to a solo group. I'd like to see more focus on actually teaching advanced students.
Agreed.

Down here in Texas, the various PCA regions that put on DE events have a specific group of Advanced Instructors to fill this void
Old 06-28-2016, 06:04 PM
  #54  
sbelles
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
 
sbelles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Here some and there some
Posts: 12,092
Received 247 Likes on 167 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by winders
Doesn't that depend where a student is in the DE cycle and what their skill level is? I know when I used to instruct at motorcycle Rider's Ed events I tended to teach a more conservative line (later apex than I would qualify on) with more room for error to students whose skill level was not relatively high. I mean the goal is different at different levels, right?

Of course, when I instructed new motorcycle racers coming up from the Rider's Ed ranks, the hardest thing to drill out of their heads was that damn late apex Rider's Ed line. Second most difficult was getting them to actively practice on non-standard lines so they new what to expect from the track when they had to go fast on parts the track not normally used in Rider's Ed.
It does but what most early students are told is the most important thing is the consistency of their line. That's important of course but it doesn't mean that you can never go offline. As far as turning in earlier and trail braking, I think most learn it by accident. As they get their braking pushed later, they end up turning while still releasing the brake without knowing that they are doing it. I've had students who were surprised when I told them that they were no longer braking in a straight line and that it was a good thing. It's not that people can't learn these things on their own, I just think it would be better if they received some consistent training in how and why.
Old 06-28-2016, 06:21 PM
  #55  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,399
Received 1,314 Likes on 799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor
Agreed.

Down here in Texas, the various PCA regions that put on DE events have a specific group of Advanced Instructors to fill this void
+1

I have used that option numerous times to improve myself (I think ). Shout out to MAV PCA to offer that option to those that attend their events.
Old 06-28-2016, 06:28 PM
  #56  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,836 Likes on 1,670 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ExMB
Students in a DE environment will progress if they listen, pay attention, etc, etc. during their time with their instructor.

IMHO students will pay more attention to an instructor if they have a financial involvement beyond the event fee when compared to none.
Agree with the first part. I guess the second part is true. Maybe I am spoiled. I don't think about the distinction much. A good instructor is a good instructor, and there are many. I apologize if I sounded like I had some attitude, I don't.

The way you took it is the risk I make posting when I earn my living doing this. I do have the luxury of allocating pure, undivided time, and it does require bringing my own set of tools that can cost up to $6K to every engagement.

No one needs data or video. But the objective measure of a driver's performance is a great, great tool. More and more intermediate and advanced drivers, not to mention instructors and racers, are using these tools and using them to "self coach" VERY effectively.

I don't think I am in "competition" with anyone, I'm just another resource. I work more collaboratively (inquiry-based leaning) than the conventional instructor>student relationship. I develop strategies that are highly targeted towards addressing particular opportunities for improvement behind the wheel negotiating the track, just like every other instructor out there. I do have the benefit of learning much more quickly about what "key" opens the door to learning for the folks I am with because I have that luxury of time. Plus, most all of the folks I work with are black/red/instructors or racers.

Folks like Chris Hall, Pete Argetsinger, Grant Maiman, Ryan Lewis, Greg Liefooghe, Seth Thomas, Tom Long, John Lewis, Cass Whitehead, Eric Foss and a few others are just alternate resources, ones that generally place a high premium on listening rather than talking.

Of course, you wouldn't know it by my posts, though!
Old 06-28-2016, 06:50 PM
  #57  
User 52121
Nordschleife Master
 
User 52121's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 8,695
Received 134 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by montoya
+1- To the OP, I would say that humility will go a long way towards improving your skills on the track. As noted above, you think you are fast until you put yourself in a different pool of very fast drivers and then you realize, wow, I suck! So humility keeps you open to criticism, helps you realize there is always more to learn and keeps you in a learning mode.
Very true... and I went through this as I progressed through the racing ranks (on 2-wheels). From the beginner "DE" groups, up through advanced, up through amateur license, to expert license, to pro license... the first few times I moved up, I went in thinking "I got this" only to get my butt handed to me....

Funny once I went in EXPECTING to get my butt handed to me, my progression at that level accelerated MUCH more quickly than previous levels where I went in thinking I was gonna rule the roost...


Originally Posted by hunterpeaks
Only thing I have to add is that if you start racing, you are most likely at some point destroy your car. If you race long enough, it's probably going to happen. And you'll be in a few incidents along the way as well. I have replaced fenders, quarter panels, bumpers. And let me tell you....It sucks each time.

Racing is amazing though and highly addicting. The old famous question applies here as well. Aspiring racer asks, "Hey, I am thinking about getting into racing, how much money should I budget for it?" Old racer replies, "All of it.".
I'd tweak that a little. I'd not necessarily say you should EXPECT to destroy your car... but IMO, you should be *willing* to, should the need arise. At some point you may find yourself faced with a choice: (a) t-bone the sideways car in front of you in the driver's door or (b) run off track and take a glancing blow to the tire wall... and you will instead try for (c) which is "none of the above", only to later learn that there WAS NO CHOICE C and instead wound up taking a head-on blow to armco while trying to avoid everything.

I've seen a lot of bad wrecks (both 2-wheeled and 4) from people who try to take the unavailable "hit nothing and come out unscathed" option, which instead leads them into much worse scenarios. Being aware and willing to take a hit in the name of safety is essential.


Originally Posted by TXE36
My two favorite opening lines to a new student:

"Don't try to impress me, you can't. Don't try to scare me, I already am."

The second works really well for checkout rides:

"There are only two things you can do to impress me. They are both bad."
Love these. Stealing them.

One BIG difference between DE and Racing is summed up PERFECTLY by ProCoach's first post in this thread:

Originally Posted by ProCoach
In order to race well, you MUST be able to drive the car and know the car's capabilities WITHOUT THINKING about it, so that you can reserve brain activity for strategic thinking. Many racers have honed their skills at DE for years before racing in a competitive event.
Fast laps does not equal a fast, winning racer.

I have a close friend on my Lemons team who still struggles with this. PCA black group level DE driver, talented, quick, safe, also a budding PCA Club Racer. Once thrown in a racing environment, really struggles. They are still focusing their concentration on driving the car. They're still ACTIVELY thinking "brake", "turn", "gas". Once you throw in open passing, a car dive-bombing, or their need to get around someone... it all falls apart. An inside pass turns into a tire-smoke, 4-wheel-lockup, sliding-off-the-track event. They get held up behind a significantly slower driver because once they have to break concentration and focus on the other car, their pace falls off, they start going off track, locking up tires, having spins, etc.

The driving part has to become automatic, autopilot, background tasks. Your concentration and focus is on the other cars around you, on strategizing, on how to catch/pass/hold off the other cars.

THAT is why I think a lot of "racers" find DE boring. The FUN of racing isn't in going around the track... it's the strategy, the dogfight, the "outsmart and out drive the other guy". All the actual "driving" is actually background task. Since DE is just about going around the track, and none of the strategy, it can be tough to stay entertained.

And if you guys think the snobbery is bad from racers looking down on DE... try being a fan of autocross LOL...
Old 06-28-2016, 07:15 PM
  #58  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,399
Received 1,314 Likes on 799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ProCoach
Agree with the first part. I guess the second part is true. Maybe I am spoiled. I don't think about the distinction much. A good instructor is a good instructor, and there are many. I apologize if I sounded like I had some attitude, I don't.
......
Of course, you wouldn't know it by my posts, though!
Its the interweb

Old 06-28-2016, 07:23 PM
  #59  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,836 Likes on 1,670 Posts
Default

Old 06-28-2016, 07:26 PM
  #60  
TXE36
Drifting
 
TXE36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: TX
Posts: 2,943
Received 191 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by sbelles
As far as turning in earlier and trail braking, I think most learn it by accident. As they get their braking pushed later, they end up turning while still releasing the brake without knowing that they are doing it. I've had students who were surprised when I told them that they were no longer braking in a straight line and that it was a good thing. It's not that people can't learn these things on their own, I just think it would be better if they received some consistent training in how and why.
About 50% of my natural trail brakers don't know they are doing it either. I will point it out to them and explain the benefits and hazards of doing it.

One of my recent students trail braked very well but when she figured out a particularly fast corner the braking zone for the next corner got "interesting". Carrying much more speed and responding to my "brake Brake BRAKE" command she hit the brakes pretty hard, but with the steering wheel turned - PSM is a wonderful thing. It ended up being a great teaching moment and a good lesson on not getting cocky.

-Mike


Quick Reply: DE versus racing. What is your experience?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 08:46 PM.