DE versus racing. What is your experience?
#46
Burning Brakes
Thread Starter
That is great to hear! I'd hate to think that "destroying" a car is inevitable although I will admit I bought an SP2 car as my first race car just so the pain of losing it (not that I plan on that!) would be bearable.
#47
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,836 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
I'm agreeing with docwyte here. That doesn't leave a lot of time to download video and review the session with a student.
Having only 1 student may make it possible if its equipment I'm familiar with.
If we are going to that extent, I believe the student needs to hire someone to get undivided attention.
Having only 1 student may make it possible if its equipment I'm familiar with.
If we are going to that extent, I believe the student needs to hire someone to get undivided attention.
I just don't agree you need a "racing coach" (or a racing venue) to WANT (and get) a few more tenths. A good instructor, teaching effectively, can impart and refine the skills, knowledge and execution prompts to do just that!
I REALLY don't agree with those that ARE trying to "find time" necessarily compromise the DE environment, as long as they follow the rules and the culture. That's all.
Somehow wanting to go racing is treated like a sin by many DE organizations.
CVR was supportive and even gave me instructors who had racing experience to do ride alongs once I was in white and deemed "ready".
It is a shame that it doesn't happen but I think racing should be discussed among the higher run group levels.
CVR was supportive and even gave me instructors who had racing experience to do ride alongs once I was in white and deemed "ready".
It is a shame that it doesn't happen but I think racing should be discussed among the higher run group levels.
On the latter, there are more and more clubs and individual regions that are bringing in folks like Peter A., Ross and I to talk specifically to higher (including instructor) run groups about advanced technique and, dare I say it, "racecraft."
The shame is that I have heard this year, more than any time in the past, frustration by black and red drivers who share that "once they're solo status, the mentoring, continuing education and development resources stop."
What I think I have learned is to treat DEs as cheap seat/track time and simply enjoy the new friends I make and time I spend on track, but I will not expect that every DE instructor I get is going to be teaching me how to race.
In fact, now I will expect just the opposite. I expect my DE coach to teach me about car control and show me a safe line at a new track.
In fact, now I will expect just the opposite. I expect my DE coach to teach me about car control and show me a safe line at a new track.
IMO, it's not optimal for some DE organizers, staff and instructors to scorn the mention of "racing." This "line of separation" can be cast in a positive light, not in the current, prevailing negative light.
The racing line is wherever to have to put the car to get through traffic. I've had a couple of students who really didn't have a clue how to compensate if they have to go off the line that they have been taught they have to keep to. For newbies I teach a somewhat safer (later apex) line then I might take but there isn't a whole lot of difference. I also encourage them to go offline once in a while so that they understand how and why they have to change inputs due to different lines.
The "racing line" to me is the quickest, most efficient and geometrically least challenging to the maintenance of momentum and progressive application of throttle. Turn in is often earlier than the "DE" or "school" line, apexes are longer and generally, all of the width of the road is used, unless otherwise indicated. It's what you do to try and drive "the perfect lap."
And THAT GOAL doesn't know the difference between DE and racing...
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
#48
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I misunderstood, then. That's NOT what I call the "racing line." That's the "passing line."
The "racing line" to me is the quickest, most efficient and geometrically least challenging to the maintenance of momentum and progressive application of throttle. Turn in is often earlier than the "DE" or "school" line, apexes are longer and generally, all of the width of the road is used, unless otherwise indicated. It's what you do to try and drive "the perfect lap."
And THAT GOAL doesn't know the difference between DE and racing...
#49
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,836 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
It's a shame that so many "advanced" students and instructors are needing to "unlearn" the stepped process most DE programs teach. That goes for line, straight-line versus trail-braking, braking technique in general, ad infinitum...
#50
I agree with docwyte on his in-car priorities. I am not suggesting instructors take the time, unless they have the time.
I just don't agree you need a "racing coach" (or a racing venue) to WANT (and get) a few more tenths. A good instructor, teaching effectively, can impart and refine the skills, knowledge and execution prompts to do just that!
I REALLY don't agree with those that ARE trying to "find time" necessarily compromise the DE environment, as long as they follow the rules and the culture. That's all.
I just don't agree you need a "racing coach" (or a racing venue) to WANT (and get) a few more tenths. A good instructor, teaching effectively, can impart and refine the skills, knowledge and execution prompts to do just that!
I REALLY don't agree with those that ARE trying to "find time" necessarily compromise the DE environment, as long as they follow the rules and the culture. That's all.
#51
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Got it. Thanks, and agree with that observation.
It's a shame that so many "advanced" students and instructors are needing to "unlearn" the stepped process most DE programs teach. That goes for line, straight-line versus trail-braking, braking technique in general, ad infinitum...
It's a shame that so many "advanced" students and instructors are needing to "unlearn" the stepped process most DE programs teach. That goes for line, straight-line versus trail-braking, braking technique in general, ad infinitum...
#52
Race Car
I misunderstood, then. That's NOT what I call the "racing line." That's the "passing line."
The "racing line" to me is the quickest, most efficient and geometrically least challenging to the maintenance of momentum and progressive application of throttle. Turn in is often earlier than the "DE" or "school" line, apexes are longer and generally, all of the width of the road is used, unless otherwise indicated. It's what you do to try and drive "the perfect lap."
And THAT GOAL doesn't know the difference between DE and racing...
The "racing line" to me is the quickest, most efficient and geometrically least challenging to the maintenance of momentum and progressive application of throttle. Turn in is often earlier than the "DE" or "school" line, apexes are longer and generally, all of the width of the road is used, unless otherwise indicated. It's what you do to try and drive "the perfect lap."
And THAT GOAL doesn't know the difference between DE and racing...
Of course, when I instructed new motorcycle racers coming up from the Rider's Ed ranks, the hardest thing to drill out of their heads was that damn late apex Rider's Ed line. Second most difficult was getting them to actively practice on non-standard lines so they new what to expect from the track when they had to go fast on parts the track not normally used in Rider's Ed.
#53
Rennlist Member
Down here in Texas, the various PCA regions that put on DE events have a specific group of Advanced Instructors to fill this void
#54
I'm in....
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
Doesn't that depend where a student is in the DE cycle and what their skill level is? I know when I used to instruct at motorcycle Rider's Ed events I tended to teach a more conservative line (later apex than I would qualify on) with more room for error to students whose skill level was not relatively high. I mean the goal is different at different levels, right?
Of course, when I instructed new motorcycle racers coming up from the Rider's Ed ranks, the hardest thing to drill out of their heads was that damn late apex Rider's Ed line. Second most difficult was getting them to actively practice on non-standard lines so they new what to expect from the track when they had to go fast on parts the track not normally used in Rider's Ed.
Of course, when I instructed new motorcycle racers coming up from the Rider's Ed ranks, the hardest thing to drill out of their heads was that damn late apex Rider's Ed line. Second most difficult was getting them to actively practice on non-standard lines so they new what to expect from the track when they had to go fast on parts the track not normally used in Rider's Ed.
#55
I have used that option numerous times to improve myself (I think ). Shout out to MAV PCA to offer that option to those that attend their events.
#56
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,836 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
The way you took it is the risk I make posting when I earn my living doing this. I do have the luxury of allocating pure, undivided time, and it does require bringing my own set of tools that can cost up to $6K to every engagement.
No one needs data or video. But the objective measure of a driver's performance is a great, great tool. More and more intermediate and advanced drivers, not to mention instructors and racers, are using these tools and using them to "self coach" VERY effectively.
I don't think I am in "competition" with anyone, I'm just another resource. I work more collaboratively (inquiry-based leaning) than the conventional instructor>student relationship. I develop strategies that are highly targeted towards addressing particular opportunities for improvement behind the wheel negotiating the track, just like every other instructor out there. I do have the benefit of learning much more quickly about what "key" opens the door to learning for the folks I am with because I have that luxury of time. Plus, most all of the folks I work with are black/red/instructors or racers.
Folks like Chris Hall, Pete Argetsinger, Grant Maiman, Ryan Lewis, Greg Liefooghe, Seth Thomas, Tom Long, John Lewis, Cass Whitehead, Eric Foss and a few others are just alternate resources, ones that generally place a high premium on listening rather than talking.
Of course, you wouldn't know it by my posts, though!
#57
+1- To the OP, I would say that humility will go a long way towards improving your skills on the track. As noted above, you think you are fast until you put yourself in a different pool of very fast drivers and then you realize, wow, I suck! So humility keeps you open to criticism, helps you realize there is always more to learn and keeps you in a learning mode.
Funny once I went in EXPECTING to get my butt handed to me, my progression at that level accelerated MUCH more quickly than previous levels where I went in thinking I was gonna rule the roost...
Only thing I have to add is that if you start racing, you are most likely at some point destroy your car. If you race long enough, it's probably going to happen. And you'll be in a few incidents along the way as well. I have replaced fenders, quarter panels, bumpers. And let me tell you....It sucks each time.
Racing is amazing though and highly addicting. The old famous question applies here as well. Aspiring racer asks, "Hey, I am thinking about getting into racing, how much money should I budget for it?" Old racer replies, "All of it.".
Racing is amazing though and highly addicting. The old famous question applies here as well. Aspiring racer asks, "Hey, I am thinking about getting into racing, how much money should I budget for it?" Old racer replies, "All of it.".
I've seen a lot of bad wrecks (both 2-wheeled and 4) from people who try to take the unavailable "hit nothing and come out unscathed" option, which instead leads them into much worse scenarios. Being aware and willing to take a hit in the name of safety is essential.
One BIG difference between DE and Racing is summed up PERFECTLY by ProCoach's first post in this thread:
I have a close friend on my Lemons team who still struggles with this. PCA black group level DE driver, talented, quick, safe, also a budding PCA Club Racer. Once thrown in a racing environment, really struggles. They are still focusing their concentration on driving the car. They're still ACTIVELY thinking "brake", "turn", "gas". Once you throw in open passing, a car dive-bombing, or their need to get around someone... it all falls apart. An inside pass turns into a tire-smoke, 4-wheel-lockup, sliding-off-the-track event. They get held up behind a significantly slower driver because once they have to break concentration and focus on the other car, their pace falls off, they start going off track, locking up tires, having spins, etc.
The driving part has to become automatic, autopilot, background tasks. Your concentration and focus is on the other cars around you, on strategizing, on how to catch/pass/hold off the other cars.
THAT is why I think a lot of "racers" find DE boring. The FUN of racing isn't in going around the track... it's the strategy, the dogfight, the "outsmart and out drive the other guy". All the actual "driving" is actually background task. Since DE is just about going around the track, and none of the strategy, it can be tough to stay entertained.
And if you guys think the snobbery is bad from racers looking down on DE... try being a fan of autocross LOL...
#58
Agree with the first part. I guess the second part is true. Maybe I am spoiled. I don't think about the distinction much. A good instructor is a good instructor, and there are many. I apologize if I sounded like I had some attitude, I don't.
......
Of course, you wouldn't know it by my posts, though!
......
Of course, you wouldn't know it by my posts, though!
#59
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,836 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
#60
As far as turning in earlier and trail braking, I think most learn it by accident. As they get their braking pushed later, they end up turning while still releasing the brake without knowing that they are doing it. I've had students who were surprised when I told them that they were no longer braking in a straight line and that it was a good thing. It's not that people can't learn these things on their own, I just think it would be better if they received some consistent training in how and why.
One of my recent students trail braked very well but when she figured out a particularly fast corner the braking zone for the next corner got "interesting". Carrying much more speed and responding to my "brake Brake BRAKE" command she hit the brakes pretty hard, but with the steering wheel turned - PSM is a wonderful thing. It ended up being a great teaching moment and a good lesson on not getting cocky.
-Mike