Cayman gt4 classing
#19
Rennlist Member
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Somewhere in a galaxy far, far away....
Posts: 17,106
Likes: 0
Received 256 Likes
on
172 Posts
this reminds me when ford started the FR500C program for competition body in white mustangs.
To get one you had to be commited to a season etc...
Will be interesting to see what class and body PMNA wants.
To get one you had to be commited to a season etc...
Will be interesting to see what class and body PMNA wants.
#21
Rennlist Member
#23
Banned
#24
Nordschleife Master
A spec class says, everyone uses Bilsteins without reservoirs and Pagid pads. Non spec lets indivual racers choose brands of things as they see fit, among other things.
#25
Banned
But GTC3 specs say everyone uses a specific brand tire and no one calls them a "spec" class, no? There seem to be a lot of non-spec parts in "spec" classes (cage, bumper, oiling, radiators, brake cooling, etc.) and a lot of spec parts in "non-spec" classes (tires, motor, gearing, etc.). Still can't make sense of why spec-ing some parts makes a certain class "spec" while spec-ing some other parts in some other classes does not. Don't mean to be a pain, just want to get to the bottom of this once and for all.
#26
Rennlist Member
#28
Banned
#29
Nordschleife Master
In Spec classes all the cars are near identical, within reason. In something like GTB1 there are huge variations in the cars and the fact that it isn't strictly a Cayman class, though it is dominated by them. 996s run GTB1 too.
Part of what may confuse the issue is the POC Cayman Spec class looked to GTB1 for consistency in the rules to align so someone who owns a car could run it both places. POC had a Cayman Spec class. PCA never has.
#30
Rennlist Member
To understand PCA race classes, you have to read their rule book a few times. Not just GTC-3 alone for example because lot of things are described contextually. Like they said, it's a very spec class. If anything is allowed, "free", it will be stated.