Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Go pro vs traditional digital in car cameras

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-02-2015, 05:05 PM
  #1  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default Go pro vs traditional digital in car cameras

we all know the convienience and cost of the gopro is amazing. BUT, ive never had very good luck with it in the car, only rear view, side view, suspension cam, etc. in the car, the wide angle is just too wide for a good incar footage.

Here is a few stills of the newer Gopro Hero3 vs the original (non wide angle ) and traditional (the one I used now... sony handycam)

the worst thing is the incar area is esposed correctly with the sony. the heros all overexpose the video out the window . however, there is a "spot" mode you can select to darken the target focused video out the front windshield.

anyone have any decent go pro video with the "spot" selected, and is there a way to narrow the view with less of a wide angle???

1st two pics are the same car (Vantage) and same go pro location, just old camera with less wide angle vs new HD go pro3. last pic is the same relative position with the Sony in the race car.
Attached Images    
Old 02-02-2015, 05:08 PM
  #2  
Juha G
Rennlist Member
 
Juha G's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Finland
Posts: 2,527
Received 60 Likes on 30 Posts
Default

Your camera is located too far back IMHO. Bring it more forward and you'll get much better picture.

I have GoPro 3 and it works quite well:

Old 02-02-2015, 05:24 PM
  #3  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Juha G
Your camera is located too far back IMHO. Bring it more forward and you'll get much better picture.

I have GoPro 3 and it works quite well:

[url="https://www.youtube.[/url]
that looks acceptable.... did you select the "spot" to darken the exposure out the window. (to keep from being way overexposed? )

actually the camera was just an arms length back.. I could reach back and turn it on. I could move it a little forward, but I don't think that will help that much. no roll bar in the students or my street car. using the suction cups and 2 extensions to move it toward the windshield.

did you narrow the field of view with a setting change??

but look how much better the sony is . the go pro also has all sorts of scaling issues. (field is too narrow and stretched vertically ) there is no reason why gopro cant match that kind of view for racers!
Old 02-02-2015, 05:34 PM
  #4  
TXE36
Drifting
 
TXE36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: TX
Posts: 2,943
Received 191 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Juha G
Your camera is located too far back IMHO. Bring it more forward and you'll get much better picture.

I have GoPro 3 and it works quite well:
+1. My GoPro 2HD is just behind the seats with spot mode exposure and it works fine with my all black interior even on bright sunny days. It did take quite a bit of futzing with it to get it all right. Mount is custom using assembled PVC fittings clamped to the roll bar. View couldn't get much better and is more limited by helmeted heads and the halos. I get a decent front view, 1/2 the passenger window when alone, 90% of my hands, the shifter, where my head is pointing, and I can see a bit of operation of the pedals. (ETA: 720P60 in the widest mode).


My gripe with the GoPros is I wish they were more reliable. My internal mic doesn't work, it has developed a tendency to lock up once in a while (requiring a battery pull), and also has another annoying quirk where sometimes the audio sync is off by about 2 seconds. I could warranty it, but I'm afraid what I get back will be worse.

I think a lot of this comes from the camera being compact. They would be better if they were a bit larger, but I don't think it will ever happen because the mainstream wants smaller.

-Mike
Old 02-02-2015, 06:11 PM
  #5  
Frank 993 C4S
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Frank 993 C4S's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: NY Tri-State
Posts: 8,563
Received 802 Likes on 491 Posts
Default

Here is another angle that Rob Slonaker showed me - mounted to the B pillar roll bar. I don't think there is any way to narrow the field. of vision.

Old 02-02-2015, 06:33 PM
  #6  
serickson
Rennlist Member
 
serickson's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: IL
Posts: 298
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

B pillar looks like the best option presented so far.
Old 02-02-2015, 06:49 PM
  #7  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXE36
+1. My GoPro 2HD is just behind the seats with spot mode exposure and it works fine with my all black interior even on bright sunny days. It did take quite a bit of futzing with it to get it all right. Mount is custom using assembled PVC fittings clamped to the roll bar. View couldn't get much better and is more limited by helmeted heads and the halos. I get a decent front view, 1/2 the passenger window when alone, 90% of my hands, the shifter, where my head is pointing, and I can see a bit of operation of the pedals. (ETA: 720P60 in the widest mode).

-Mike


Thanks! that doesn't look bad, and if that's the same resolution setting , then that might work if I can get the camera farther forward. The "spot" setting seems to be the fix for the main issue I have..

what you might want to do , is tilt the camera down a little... I hate to have any ceiling in the picture, its pure wasted space. better to get the legs and pedals than the black ceiling

Originally Posted by Frank 993 C4S
Here is another angle that Rob Slonaker showed me - mounted to the B pillar roll bar. I don't think there is any way to narrow the field. of vision.

http://vimeo.com/104524443
that's a good idea! what do you know about the resolution settings. I think that's a way to narrow the view. I thought it was only for quality, but it might help in the problem I see.

Originally Posted by serickson
B pillar looks like the best option presented so far.
I agree! (edit) Hmmmmmm I think I don't like the A pillar in the way of all the car action... I think it still needs to be centered.. too wide of an angle also.. Just don't think the go pro has what it takes for the main view.... outside the car, yes, inside, not what I have seen so far.
Old 02-02-2015, 07:02 PM
  #8  
TXE36
Drifting
 
TXE36's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: TX
Posts: 2,943
Received 191 Likes on 128 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort

what you might want to do , is tilt the camera down a little... I hate to have any ceiling in the picture, its pure wasted space. better to get the legs and pedals than the black ceiling .
It's a compromise. If I tilt it down, then the the view out the windscreen and down the track is degraded. It was actually pretty tricky to find a spot that offered the widest FOV, got most of me, didn't look directly at the pavement, and didn't have the rear view mirror blocking a big part of the view. Another concern was keeping the camera as close to the roll bar as possible, as the more it is cantilevered off the bar, the more the camera shakes. Camera mounts have to be very stout, or you get camera shake which looks like crap. YMMV.

I do like the B-pillar idea, but I don't think that works in two seat cars.

-Mike
Old 02-02-2015, 09:06 PM
  #9  
kgorman
Drifting
 
kgorman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 2,482
Received 41 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Yes use spot metering. You can set the field of view as well.

http://abekislevitz.com/understanding-your-new-gopro/

http://abekislevitz.com/understandin...-in-the-hero4/
Old 02-02-2015, 11:11 PM
  #10  
NaroEscape
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
NaroEscape's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,712
Received 519 Likes on 278 Posts
Default

I never had an issue with FOV...always thought it looked pretty good, though our GoPro is an original HD
I can't remember where I have it set, but in the manual (yes...I read that!!) it explained what was best for Motorsports use.

__________________
Bob Saville

Getting You On Track!
www.naroescapemotorsports.com
704-395-2975
  • Data Analysis & Coaching
  • Drivers Gear
  • Crew Gear
  • Car Gear

'07 SPC
'71 914/6 Huey
'04 GT3

Old 02-02-2015, 11:54 PM
  #11  
mark kibort
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
mark kibort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: saratoga, ca
Posts: 29,946
Received 141 Likes on 60 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TXE36
It's a compromise. If I tilt it down, then the the view out the windscreen and down the track is degraded. It was actually pretty tricky to find a spot that offered the widest FOV, got most of me, didn't look directly at the pavement, and didn't have the rear view mirror blocking a big part of the view. Another concern was keeping the camera as close to the roll bar as possible, as the more it is cantilevered off the bar, the more the camera shakes. Camera mounts have to be very stout, or you get camera shake which looks like crap. YMMV.

I do like the B-pillar idea, but I don't think that works in two seat cars.

-Mike
that's a good point.. you cant just move a wide angle camera down. I think you have maximized it quite well. ill try and get it more forward but its going to be tough in the cars with no roll bar and the extensions I have for the camera. (with no roll bar)
Old 02-03-2015, 01:16 AM
  #12  
Ritter v4.0
Rennlist Member
 
Ritter v4.0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Nassau, Bahamas and Duluth, Ga.
Posts: 4,334
Received 97 Likes on 46 Posts
Default

I've had GoPros and traditional handheld cams but now I have an AIM SC HD and this - Drift HD Ghost.

The AIM is for mainly dash integration and data but the Drift is better as a camera in every way. And better vs. the GoPros IMHO.

Big screen for set up and playback, adj FOV and exposure settings, digital zoom., frame rate up to 30 fps, great audio via external mike, can set up and view via smartphone with wifi and has bigass remote with just two large buttons that you can Velcro to the dash. Easy to operate with gloves on and with big colour coded lights, you'll always know when it's on.

Had it for 3 years and my son snowboards with his- no issues.

My videos look like this one from Drift except that they have better editing (and droving).
Attached Images  
Old 02-03-2015, 08:35 AM
  #13  
RickBetterley
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
RickBetterley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: On Rennlist, apparently
Posts: 4,447
Likes: 0
Received 37 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Ritter v4.0
I've had GoPros and traditional handheld cams but now I have an AIM SC HD and this - Drift HD Ghost. The AIM is for mainly dash integration and data but the Drift is better as a camera in every way. And better vs. the GoPros IMHO. Big screen for set up and playback, adj FOV and exposure settings, digital zoom., frame rate up to 30 fps, great audio via external mike, can set up and view via smartphone with wifi and has bigass remote with just two large buttons that you can Velcro to the dash. Easy to operate with gloves on and with big colour coded lights, you'll always know when it's on. Had it for 3 years and my son snowboards with his- no issues. My videos look like this one from Drift except that they have better editing (and droving). Video Link: http://youtu.be/p6YGuR524DY
I have a Drift Hd as well; bought it for kayaking in Alaska and Maine and it's terrific. Chose it because it is waterproof to -10' without a case. And for the big remote.
I've tried it skiing but the vids are boring (probably a good thing).
Have thought about using it as a 2nd camera driving but at this point not interested enough in a second view. But I could be convinced.
A great product overshadowed by GoPro.
Old 02-03-2015, 09:04 AM
  #14  
ProCoach
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
 
ProCoach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,649
Received 2,801 Likes on 1,655 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RickBetterley
Have thought about using it as a 2nd camera driving but at this point not interested enough in a second view.

But I could be convinced.

A great product overshadowed by the GoPro marketing machine.
Fixed it for you!
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway






















Old 02-03-2015, 11:34 AM
  #15  
Rob in VA
Three Wheelin'
 
Rob in VA's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,475
Received 25 Likes on 22 Posts
Default

Good information here. Lots of easily noticeable fish eye in the video shot on the drift camera though. But it was cool to actually see where all of the cameras were mounted in that video. I liked the results from the rollbar mount the best.


Quick Reply: Go pro vs traditional digital in car cameras



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:53 PM.