Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Cup vs Cup - S

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-30-2013, 03:54 PM
  #1  
BBMGT3
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
BBMGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,233
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default Cup vs Cup - S

Hi

Anyone have an idea of what laps faster, quali, sprint, enduro?

2012 Cup vs 2009 Cup-S
Old 06-30-2013, 06:35 PM
  #2  
Rassel
Drifting
 
Rassel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,277
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

IIRC - Cup S is faster. Better suspension, more rubber to the ground and better aero. But to be on the safe side, check some qual lap times. It's a bit apples and oranges. One is a decently priced sprint racer for a one make series, the other a FIA regulated endurance racer.
Old 06-30-2013, 09:14 PM
  #3  
Surfbum
Burning Brakes
 
Surfbum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 990
Received 11 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I am pretty sure the Cup S has ABS brakes, I also believe that the 2014 Cups will be running the same tire size as the Cup S
Old 07-01-2013, 02:20 AM
  #4  
BBMGT3
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
BBMGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,233
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rassel
IIRC - Cup S is faster. Better suspension, more rubber to the ground and better aero. But to be on the safe side, check some qual lap times. It's a bit apples and oranges. One is a decently priced sprint racer for a one make series, the other a FIA regulated endurance racer.
cool thanks, actually the reason why I am asking is because I'm entering an endurance race and have a choice of cars and they're both regulated to 90L fuel tanks. Sounds like the S is the way to go.
Old 07-01-2013, 08:24 AM
  #5  
coryf
Rennlist Member
 
coryf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 1,363
Received 128 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

The 09 cup S originally had a 3.6l engine. I believe the 09 spec included ABS. The 12 would be a 3,8l car. I would go with the S if it has a 3,8l. If not I would expect the 12 to be faster. Any idea if they are going to run the same size tires?
Old 07-01-2013, 11:49 AM
  #6  
BBMGT3
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
BBMGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,233
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coryf
The 09 cup S originally had a 3.6l engine. I believe the 09 spec included ABS. The 12 would be a 3,8l car. I would go with the S if it has a 3,8l. If not I would expect the 12 to be faster. Any idea if they are going to run the same size tires?
Really don't know.

Stock -S s 3.6L
Stock '12 Cup is 3.8L

Bear in mind the Cup-S was the predecessor to the GT3-R

So it sounds like the faster car, BUT, the 40HP deficit is not to be ignored.

Would love to hear from someone who has driven both.
Old 07-01-2013, 12:51 PM
  #7  
coryf
Rennlist Member
 
coryf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Charleston SC
Posts: 1,363
Received 128 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

The factory grand-am model in 2009 was basically a cup s with stock rear fender flairs. 3.6l, rsr brakes/suspension, and cup S front bodywork. I have driven one of those with a 3.6 and a 3.8. I have also driven the newer second gen 3.8's. I believe a 3.8l newer car is going to be faster assuming the same tires, set-up than the 3.6l S. A 3.8l S would basically be the same speed as the 12 stock cup but with better endurance features like extended brake pad life from the RSR size calipers and if it had ABS would be easier to drive. Either car would be a good choice though.
Old 07-01-2013, 03:08 PM
  #8  
BBMGT3
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
BBMGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,233
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by coryf
The factory grand-am model in 2009 was basically a cup s with stock rear fender flairs. 3.6l, rsr brakes/suspension, and cup S front bodywork. I have driven one of those with a 3.6 and a 3.8. I have also driven the newer second gen 3.8's. I believe a 3.8l newer car is going to be faster assuming the same tires, set-up than the 3.6l S. A 3.8l S would basically be the same speed as the 12 stock cup but with better endurance features like extended brake pad life from the RSR size calipers and if it had ABS would be easier to drive. Either car would be a good choice though.
thanks, thats good feedback... from what I understand the '12 and the 'S are equivalent in qualifying trim, and if anything the '12 maybe a few tenths faster, but over a 90L stint the S is faster because the better aero/suspension/tires/brakes come into play mid-stint.
Old 07-01-2013, 04:37 PM
  #9  
Rassel
Drifting
 
Rassel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 3,277
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by BBMGT3
thanks, thats good feedback... from what I understand the '12 and the 'S are equivalent in qualifying trim, and if anything the '12 maybe a few tenths faster, but over a 90L stint the S is faster because the better aero/suspension/tires/brakes come into play mid-stint.
The engine output is not much different 440 vs 450. Don't know how you feel about ABS, but it's comforting in endurance. Especially if you run into bad weather in the middle of the night. If I rented a bone stock seat I'd take the Cup S. If I'm getting a car I'd take a '12 Cup and change suspension on it and perhaps retrofit a ABS.

I'm not sure the transmission is the same either. Suspension does make a difference. I have not tried a Grand-Am, but if it has RSR suspension it should be superior to a stock Cup. Cory I think you've looked into this a bit?

BBMGT3 - I'm sorry I'm a bit rusty in my memory here. Cory knows quite a bit about these cars, so I'm not going to question his knowledge.

Reg. the Cup R - It's quite a bit faster and shouldn't be compared.
Old 07-02-2013, 01:36 AM
  #10  
BBMGT3
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Thread Starter
 
BBMGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,233
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Rassel
The engine output is not much different 440 vs 450. Don't know how you feel about ABS, but it's comforting in endurance. Especially if you run into bad weather in the middle of the night. If I rented a bone stock seat I'd take the Cup S. If I'm getting a car I'd take a '12 Cup and change suspension on it and perhaps retrofit a ABS.

I'm not sure the transmission is the same either. Suspension does make a difference. I have not tried a Grand-Am, but if it has RSR suspension it should be superior to a stock Cup. Cory I think you've looked into this a bit?

BBMGT3 - I'm sorry I'm a bit rusty in my memory here. Cory knows quite a bit about these cars, so I'm not going to question his knowledge.

Reg. the Cup R - It's quite a bit faster and shouldn't be compared.
Didn't realize the power was that close. I thought the Cup-S was 408 to the wheels? Ok nevermind that would imply 430-440 crank...

The R is another world, not comparing.

If I had to buy one of these cars I would definitely get the normal Cup. Cup-S is dead as a GT3 car, but its interesting now because of equivalency regulations in various endurance series, in that the Cup-S runs in the same class as new Cups (not 991s).

Totally agree about ABS. I rarely engage it even when I have it, but when I do, I'm happy that its there!



Quick Reply: Cup vs Cup - S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:11 PM.