New SP996 Build
#18
Rennlist Member
Great looking car !
A couple fyi things that I see.
As already mentioned, the Accusump location is an issue, besides the obvious potential of leaking oil, it does put out quite a bit of heat, as it has hot oil circulating thru it, and your car will be in Texas heat and is black so it will be plenty hot inside the car already. I would mount under car in tunnel or in fender well. Or if mounted inside car I would have it contained in a box.
Another thing I noticed is the additional scoop on the deck lid, from my understanding and reading of the rules for SP996 the scoop is not allowed in that class. I could be mistaken and maybe the rules have changed since I last looked, but you might double check this to be sure you are legal within the rules. FYI - In my opinion the scoop actually should be added to the rules as it will help the cars go slightly faster and the expense is quite minimal with no maintenance or downsides, but that is a decision for the rule makers to make and add into the rules. If you don't expect to be a front runner you might leave it on the car and start discussing with the other SP 996 racers and maybe it can get added to the rules.
On the cage I noticed that the horizontal bar, that they have as 2 separate bars for harness bars, may not be legal per NASA rules. I'm not saying that it is not safe or strong, I understand where the design came from.
Also, and it's hard to tell from the pictures but are all the drivers door NASCAR bars of the same diameter ?
I can't wait to see it in person and it's wonderful to see this class gaining more cars.
See you at the track,
Viking
A couple fyi things that I see.
As already mentioned, the Accusump location is an issue, besides the obvious potential of leaking oil, it does put out quite a bit of heat, as it has hot oil circulating thru it, and your car will be in Texas heat and is black so it will be plenty hot inside the car already. I would mount under car in tunnel or in fender well. Or if mounted inside car I would have it contained in a box.
Another thing I noticed is the additional scoop on the deck lid, from my understanding and reading of the rules for SP996 the scoop is not allowed in that class. I could be mistaken and maybe the rules have changed since I last looked, but you might double check this to be sure you are legal within the rules. FYI - In my opinion the scoop actually should be added to the rules as it will help the cars go slightly faster and the expense is quite minimal with no maintenance or downsides, but that is a decision for the rule makers to make and add into the rules. If you don't expect to be a front runner you might leave it on the car and start discussing with the other SP 996 racers and maybe it can get added to the rules.
On the cage I noticed that the horizontal bar, that they have as 2 separate bars for harness bars, may not be legal per NASA rules. I'm not saying that it is not safe or strong, I understand where the design came from.
Also, and it's hard to tell from the pictures but are all the drivers door NASCAR bars of the same diameter ?
I can't wait to see it in person and it's wonderful to see this class gaining more cars.
See you at the track,
Viking
#19
Another thing I noticed is the additional scoop on the deck lid, from my understanding and reading of the rules for SP996 the scoop is not allowed in that class. I could be mistaken and maybe the rules have changed since I last looked, but you might double check this to be sure you are legal within the rules. FYI - In my opinion the scoop actually should be added to the rules as it will help the cars go slightly faster and the expense is quite minimal with no maintenance or downsides, but that is a decision for the rule makers to make and add into the rules. If you don't expect to be a front runner you might leave it on the car and start discussing with the other SP 996 racers and maybe it can get added to the rules.
http://www.gettydesign.com/996_wings.html#specwing
#20
Rennlist Member
#21
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
#22
I assume if Getty designed/built it for SP996, then it's legal.
#23
Rennlist Member
Like I said, I wish it would be written into the rules as ok, but as the rules currently are written I don't see it.
Rules creep in a Spec class can be very damaging for the growth and cost of the class. Grey areas are grey areas but should be defined clearly for the benefit of all the participants.
#24
Rennlist Member
#25
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
Great looking car !
If you don't expect to be a front runner you might leave it on the car and start discussing with the other SP 996 racers and maybe it can get added to the rules.
On the cage I noticed that the horizontal bar, that they have as 2 separate bars for harness bars, may not be legal per NASA rules. I'm not saying that it is not safe or strong, I understand where the design came from.
Also, and it's hard to tell from the pictures but are all the drivers door NASCAR bars of the same diameter ?
Viking
If you don't expect to be a front runner you might leave it on the car and start discussing with the other SP 996 racers and maybe it can get added to the rules.
On the cage I noticed that the horizontal bar, that they have as 2 separate bars for harness bars, may not be legal per NASA rules. I'm not saying that it is not safe or strong, I understand where the design came from.
Also, and it's hard to tell from the pictures but are all the drivers door NASCAR bars of the same diameter ?
Viking
Regarding the cage, it was installed by a NASA tech shop (by the previous owner) and comes with a NASA log book, although it's never been raced. And the door bars are the same diameter, just the padding is probably making them look off.
#26
#27
The Penguin King
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
FWIW, I've never installed an accusump because I've not liked the idea of having it in the cockpit with me, and the other locations have their own set of issues. So far oiling has not been an issue, but that could be because I can't keep the car off of the wall long enough for the engine to experience oil starvation.
#29
Rennlist Member