Originally Posted by Larry Herman (Post 7447924)

April Fools? :confused:

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor (Post 7447926)

I doubt SFI would pull a prank like that on their own website.

Originally Posted by Larry Herman (Post 7447929)

I MEANT YOU, DUMMY! :D

Originally Posted by Carrera51 (Post 7448952)

As Joe said, this only applies to Impact's products produced in 2009-2010. Seems that there as still issues with earlier products.

One of my circle track friends said that the tracks that they race on have a ban on Impact products in effect.

Originally Posted by Carrera51 (Post 7449030)

VR:
I am not trying to minimize it. Seriously, rules are rules and Impact broke them. I wouldn't use there stuff. Between this and the phony HANS anchors thing, they are damaged goods.

I suppose this is good news for those who may have bought a $900+ dollar within the last 12 months and now will not have to replace it.

Originally Posted by Veloce Raptor (Post 7448990)

You clowns were SO eager to jump on the bandwagon when SFI whined that they hadn't gotten their $ from Impact (and that is all that label really is IMO....a licensing fee). Now they have rescinded a large part of that claim, and you are trying to minimize it.

Originally Posted by Carrera51 (Post 7449030)

Between this and the phony HANS anchors thing, they are damaged goods.

Originally Posted by PedalFaster (Post 7449290)

At least in my case, that's because I support certification bodies charging a nominal fee to fund their activities, but I don't support safety equipment manufacturers secretly skipping the parts of the standards they didn't feel like complying with.


Don't forget that last year they also had a suit decertification because they "[did] not fully comply with the minimum standards set forth in the SFI Specification 3.2A Program". So, three strikes at this point.