My New Open Trailer - I'm so excited!
#35
I like the height of this tire rack. It doesn't stick up above the tow vehicle. Is that a lockable box up front with the Speedware logo, or just a canopy?
Also, great looking extension ramps with the step that accompanies the Featherlite ramps....
Also, great looking extension ramps with the step that accompanies the Featherlite ramps....
Last edited by jrgordonsenior; 11-15-2009 at 09:42 AM.
#37
#38
Custom made and the tire rack bolts to the top of the box
I can and do still use stock placed d-rings
previous owner had the box made and mounted
it is bolted to the deck floor and I presume it is easy to remove but I cannot think of a reason that I would want to remove it
it is quite handy and the doors are weather sealed so I leave a lot of my track stuff in the box so I do not have to reload each time
I can and do still use stock placed d-rings
previous owner had the box made and mounted
it is bolted to the deck floor and I presume it is easy to remove but I cannot think of a reason that I would want to remove it
it is quite handy and the doors are weather sealed so I leave a lot of my track stuff in the box so I do not have to reload each time
#39
Are most of you who use open trailers just DEing or you race as well? Just wondering because when i raced i always had an enclosed because of everything i would try to take with me to the track ( i was racing karts and drag racing, may be you do not need as much road racing?)>
thanks
thanks
#41
Are most of you who use open trailers just DEing or you race as well? Just wondering because when i raced i always had an enclosed because of everything i would try to take with me to the track ( i was racing karts and drag racing, may be you do not need as much road racing?)>
thanks
thanks
I have a Snugtop shell on the back of my truck in which I haul 2 sets of tires/wheels, a 200 ft N tank, tool boxes, floor jack, and a couple of large RubberMaid containers with my spares, jack stands, etc. I keep my all personal gear, helmet, etc. in the back seat of my crew cab. I'll switch to the Pace for the winter events. It's easy, I just transfer over the Rubermaid tubs, wheels, etc. It takes just a few minutes.
I would only have the open Featherlite if the weather would cooperate. A tire rack and locking container like PJS's would really be helpful....
#42
Dave, that is a LONG time claim on the Internet, but I have never seen it actually happen. I have trailered many different 911s of various years/decades, and never had an alignment impacted by crossed straps through the wheels.
Trailex actually suggests the crossed wheel straps.
How would a car do cornering at 1G+ if the alignment could be knocked out on a trailer?
Trailex actually suggests the crossed wheel straps.
How would a car do cornering at 1G+ if the alignment could be knocked out on a trailer?
#44
Are most of you who use open trailers just DEing or you race as well? Just wondering because when i raced i always had an enclosed because of everything i would try to take with me to the track ( i was racing karts and drag racing, may be you do not need as much road racing?)>
thanks
thanks
#45
We're actually mixing two separate issues here.... the physics of crossed straps, and whether the tie downs are attached through the wheels vs. the frame. So there are 4 different permutations here, not two.
And there is a third issue which is rarely discussed, and that is the purpose of the tie down straps in the first place.
Why use tie-downs?
I would never try it, but I think my car would stay planted on my trailer without any straps at all. The forces I feel inside the tow vehicle are not even close to the forces required to overcome the frictional forces of the car wheels on the trailer bed. So the straps are there for the unexpected emergency. And in an emergency, I don't want to introduce any more variables than necessary. I just want those straps to keep the car from coming through the back window of my tow vehicle!
Crossed vs. straight straps
In this light, consider first the crossed straps: Think about this analogy... You're winching the car up onto the trailer. Assume that the winch is mounted on the tongue and does not move with the angle of the trailer bed. Start winching with the ramps and trailer being at a low angle (say 10 degrees). Now increase the angle to 20 degrees. Did you not just put an extra load on the winch? Increase the angle to 45 degrees. Do you hear the pitch of the winch motor change? Increase the angle to 60 degrees. Are you stepping back away from the winch cable out of fear that something will snap? Get the picture?
Now flip that picture onto its side, and imagine that the winch cable is a tie down strap, and the angle of the ramps/trailer represent the angle of the forward motion of the trailer vs. the crossed straps. Just as it takes more force to walk uphill, it takes more force to stop the forward motion of a car tied down to a trailer with crossed straps.
Try this analogy also: pick up a 10 ft long, 20 lb bar, holding it at the center so that it is balanced. How much force is it exerting on your arm? 20 lbs. of course. Now pick it up from one of the ends, so that 8 or 9 ft of it is out in front of you. Now how much force is it exerting on your arm? Not 22, 25, or 30, but multiples of 20! There's a set of physics formulas that prove all of this, but hopefully the examples make the point.
To the frame vs. through the wheels
Assume that you're pulling a trailer at highway speeds, and encounter undulations in the road that cause your tow vehicle to compress and bounce on its own suspension. What's happening on the trailer? The trailer will absorb some of the bouncing with it's own suspension, but at some level, the car also will bounce slightly on it's own suspension, absorbing what the trailer could not. (Have you ever noticed a big rig trailer hauling 10 or more cars down the highway, cars bouncing up and down slightly with each bump in the road?) But the wheels are not moving around! The frictional force of the wheels on the trailer bed is clearly stronger than the spring rate in your suspension, so the car bounces on its suspension.
Now, what's happening to the tie-down straps? Well, if they're through the wheels, and wheels are not moving, the straps are not moving. But if they are attached to the frame of the car, as the car bounces, the straps are being tugged at. As Brian mentioned, straps do stretch. Since the wheels presumably never move around, but the frame does, straps will stretch more if tied to the frame of the car than if they are attached through the wheels.
The combined impact
The way I look at it, the angle of crossed straps is the more significant issue. When you bought your tie down straps, was your decision not in part influenced by the weight rating? Imagine buying straps rated for 5000 lbs of force because your car weighed 3000 lbs. But did you calculate the effective weight on the straps due to the extra force induced by the angle? Do you know how much closer to the 5000 lb limit you will get with your particular setup? (remember the bar analogy... depending on the angle, we're talking geometric increases, not arithmetic increases).
My point is simply this: crossing the straps introduces a set of forces that for most of us, is not worth the mental math required to feel confident that our straps will hold. To use my earlier analogies, why make guesses with "how much extra force is required to walk up the steeper hill", when it's just as easy to walk on a flat surface? Why pick up a bar at the end when it's easier to pick it up at the middle?
Attaching to the frame vs. the wheels seems to be a minor issue in comparison. Until, that is, you combine "to the frame" with "crossed straps". In this setup, you would be tugging on the straps with each bump, each turn, each application of the tow vehicle brake and accelerator, etc. Straps get stretched, and the frame is allowed to bounce a tiny bit more, putting even greater strain on the straps, making them even looser. (back to my analogis, it's like bouncing the angle of the trailer bed and ramps while trying to winch it up at 30 degree angle to begin with, or picking up the 20 lb bar at one end while someone is continually slapping the other end towards the floor).
Back to the reason for tie-downs
Then, when you most need those straps to do their job (extreme braking), you're going to snap tight those loose straps with a force that is multiples greater than if they had been straight. How much greater is unknown, because it was too complicated to figure out.
The whole "messing up the alignment" concerns out there are just silly. And they are also a distraction from the more important question of "messing up your straps" (thanks for pointing that out Brian). Not a big issue either, unless you're crossing them. Why cheat the laws of physics on the grounds that every-day usage does no harm, when every day usage could probably get away with no straps at all? I would be interested in hearing evidence of tie-down strategies in the event of accidents or accident avoidance! After all, that's why we use them.