Why not resurrect a good old one?
01-13-2002, 08:00 PM
#16
Burning Brakes
It would be expensive to build. Just because the technology is old doesn't mean it would be cheap to produce today. I bet it would cost even more than the 996.
01-16-2002, 10:32 PM
#17
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by E. J.:
<STRONG>240hp + 160lb/ft torque = NO THANK YOU!
</STRONG>
<STRONG>240hp + 160lb/ft torque = NO THANK YOU!
</STRONG>
Having said that, no I wouldn't want one but they are awesome cars...
JM
01-17-2002, 03:44 AM
#18
Race Director
Paul Mumford who has both a Viper GTS and an S2000 said that at Laguna Seca, his S2000 was only a couple of seconds behind his Viper. He actually got FTD that day last January against a boat-load of fast cars, including Vipers & Porsches.
01-17-2002, 10:17 AM
#19
Drifting
Join Date: May 2001
Location: Villanova, PA
Posts: 2,331
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Jean-Marc, Didn't mean to say it wasn't a capable car. I too have driven them at the track and just not for me.
Danno, goes to prove the most important addage of track driving: the driver is more important than the car.
E. J.
Danno, goes to prove the most important addage of track driving: the driver is more important than the car.
E. J.
01-19-2002, 01:48 AM
#20
Racer
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 471
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Danno, goes to prove the most important addage of track driving: the driver is more important than the car.
E. J.[/QB][/QUOTE]
Up to a point and after that, it's the cars only... Anyway, I'm sure we all agree
E. J.[/QB][/QUOTE]
Up to a point and after that, it's the cars only... Anyway, I'm sure we all agree