Should racers pay for damage they cause during a race?
#46
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 38D
That seems completely unecessary to me. 95% of the people that I have raced with are aware and courteous.
Its also THE best way to come out of possible contact situations w/ ONLY tire marks vs. much worse.
#47
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hand me the bat..... now where's that dead horse..?
Seriously, my only point is a very theoretical one... and that is that 13/13 is going to change the risk/reward relationship relative to unrestricted racing. Emerging with "just" scrapes and tire marks will get you just as suspended as T-boneing somebody.
That does not make 13/13 better or worse... just different. It requires a different driving style and a different approach to managing risk.
Call me a pansey, but I have a very tight budget and a very expensive car to repair. My reluctance to risk my car would put me at a much bigger disadvantage in SCCA. Personally I like the fact that the rich guy beside me has just as much incentive to avoid contact as I do.
Seriously, my only point is a very theoretical one... and that is that 13/13 is going to change the risk/reward relationship relative to unrestricted racing. Emerging with "just" scrapes and tire marks will get you just as suspended as T-boneing somebody.
That does not make 13/13 better or worse... just different. It requires a different driving style and a different approach to managing risk.
Call me a pansey, but I have a very tight budget and a very expensive car to repair. My reluctance to risk my car would put me at a much bigger disadvantage in SCCA. Personally I like the fact that the rich guy beside me has just as much incentive to avoid contact as I do.
#48
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
13/13 does on occasion cause more damage than "normal" racing would. Explaination: you may make a more evasive manuever because you are worried about tapping someone that unintentionally braked earlier than expected and getting a 13. You slide off track and possibly hit a wall, another driver, or just have a regular OTE and lose a lot of places. SCCA racing you just tap that person leaving a small mark and continuing to race. Hopefully both cars are none the worse for wear. I have seen/heard of many situations like this in PCA.
I don't think I am way off here but I am sure I will be told if I am.
I don't think I am way off here but I am sure I will be told if I am.
#49
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Greg Fishman
13/13 does on occasion cause more damage than "normal" racing would. Explaination: you may make a more evasive manuever because you are worried about tapping someone that unintentionally braked earlier than expected and getting a 13. You slide off track and possibly hit a wall, another driver, or just have a regular OTE and lose a lot of places. SCCA racing you just tap that person leaving a small mark and continuing to race. Hopefully both cars are none the worse for wear. I have seen/heard of many situations like this in PCA.
I don't think I am way off here but I am sure I will be told if I am.
I don't think I am way off here but I am sure I will be told if I am.
No, you are probably right. There's an upside and downside to everything.
Another factor is that somebody who does drive in a wild intimidating mannor or blocks excessively can create an advantage since it is the responsibility of the other driver to avoid contact.
I can tell you that at the top 1/3rd of the most competitive classes the guys have been racing together for years and I guarantee you, they aren't motoring around sipping tea with their pinkies out.
#50
Addict
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by JCP911S
No, you are probably right. There's an upside and downside to everything.
Another factor is that somebody who does drive in a wild intimidating mannor or blocks excessively can create an advantage since it is the responsibility of the other driver to avoid contact.
I can tell you that at the top 1/3rd of the most competitive classes the guys have been racing together for years and I guarantee you, they aren't motoring around sipping tea with their pinkies out.
Another factor is that somebody who does drive in a wild intimidating mannor or blocks excessively can create an advantage since it is the responsibility of the other driver to avoid contact.
I can tell you that at the top 1/3rd of the most competitive classes the guys have been racing together for years and I guarantee you, they aren't motoring around sipping tea with their pinkies out.
I agree with you as well. I remember a fellow racers commenting on another guy in our classes tactics. "What he lacks in talent, he makes up in being an absolute nut." Most gave him a wide berth.
#51
Lifetime Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Greg Fishman
13/13 does on occasion cause more damage than "normal" racing would. Explaination: you may make a more evasive manuever because you are worried about tapping someone that unintentionally braked earlier than expected and getting a 13. You slide off track and possibly hit a wall, another driver, or just have a regular OTE and lose a lot of places. SCCA racing you just tap that person leaving a small mark and continuing to race. Hopefully both cars are none the worse for wear. I have seen/heard of many situations like this in PCA.
I don't think I am way off here but I am sure I will be told if I am.
I don't think I am way off here but I am sure I will be told if I am.
#52
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Hey All;
Everyone is making good points here. Greg is right on the mark with Post #48. Sunday follows on sagely. Guys too afraid of contact can indeed cause WORSE contact by trying to avoid the little ones. It's a tough thing to think of your baby getting crunched. Not necessarily smart to race your baby in the first place, I guess.
Of course, Der Professor probably has more race miles than 10 other guys here combined, and his comments on tactics are exquisite and much appreciated, even by non-racer-wannabees like me.
Prof: I did not mean to say that I would go around randomly terrorizing my fellow competitors. However, I would make it plain to anyone "lacking in judegment" that if they did so to my continuing dissadvantage, I would not look the other way again. I would hope to be right over apologizing if I committed a blunder that cost someone else. It would be my guess that if YOU were the party that had an error in judgement, you would say so mano e mano, as a good man would, and should. Saying you are sorry that someone got pranged in a "racing accident" goes a long way. Really fessing up when you blow it is even better.
Everyone is making good points here. Greg is right on the mark with Post #48. Sunday follows on sagely. Guys too afraid of contact can indeed cause WORSE contact by trying to avoid the little ones. It's a tough thing to think of your baby getting crunched. Not necessarily smart to race your baby in the first place, I guess.
Of course, Der Professor probably has more race miles than 10 other guys here combined, and his comments on tactics are exquisite and much appreciated, even by non-racer-wannabees like me.
Prof: I did not mean to say that I would go around randomly terrorizing my fellow competitors. However, I would make it plain to anyone "lacking in judegment" that if they did so to my continuing dissadvantage, I would not look the other way again. I would hope to be right over apologizing if I committed a blunder that cost someone else. It would be my guess that if YOU were the party that had an error in judgement, you would say so mano e mano, as a good man would, and should. Saying you are sorry that someone got pranged in a "racing accident" goes a long way. Really fessing up when you blow it is even better.
#53
Rennlist Member
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
At the MidOhio club race I followed a red GT3 car in B with my D 993 around for about 6 laps. I'd catch him in the corners get to his door and he'd chop me off in the corner every time. At least 4 times I went agro. Ultimately gave up because of the 13/13. I was convinced he didn't know where I was. But it was fun catching his GT3 in an 82,000 mile daily driver 993
![order](https://rennlist.com/forums/graemlins/order.gif)
#54
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The 13/13 does lessen damage, from my reporting vantage at many races, SCCA, NASA and PCA. It cant create bullying, where the one most afraid of contact loses out in a close battle; and where one driver, maybe even or a little faster in a spot, dive bombs. But overall, a good thing in avoiding car to car contact.
I do like in NASA, where they encourage two drivers to work it out if damage is minimal; at least people know a conversation is coming.
However, I was hit 3/4 broadside in a NASA event, by a wild car who went off and re-entered at 70mph to avoid hitting the corner station. This was 3 turns from the checkered.Over $4000 damage; not one word from the guy, and he went and got a trophy.
Courtesy tells you in more major hits to, at least, go check on the person, if not offer some car parts or something.
PM
I do like in NASA, where they encourage two drivers to work it out if damage is minimal; at least people know a conversation is coming.
However, I was hit 3/4 broadside in a NASA event, by a wild car who went off and re-entered at 70mph to avoid hitting the corner station. This was 3 turns from the checkered.Over $4000 damage; not one word from the guy, and he went and got a trophy.
Courtesy tells you in more major hits to, at least, go check on the person, if not offer some car parts or something.
PM
#55
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by RedlineMan
Of course, Der Professor probably has more race miles than 10 other guys here combined, and his comments on tactics are exquisite and much appreciated, even by non-racer-wannabees like me..
Originally Posted by RedlineMan
;
Prof: I did not mean to say that I would go around randomly terrorizing my fellow competitors.
Prof: I did not mean to say that I would go around randomly terrorizing my fellow competitors.
I have had to both accept and offer mucho 'mea culpas' for on-track shenanigans. If you're accepting them, it's OK to still be pissed...you don't have to say "OK...don't worry about it". It's a 'learning moment' for those involved...use it as such. I've also gotten drilled and knew instantly that it was purely accidental, and given the appropriate wave to an offered 'Sorry!' wave on track.
It helps to know sign language, apparently, unless you're a telepath.
#58
Race Director
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by 38D
That seems completely unecessary to me. 95% of the people that I have raced with are aware and courteous. I sure as heck don't try to squeeze in some absurdly tight pass just so they "get the message"(JC in NY may disagree
). I also always give people room once they have me, as if they make a mistake, I'd like to have some correction room. And when I am done with a race, I don't even want there to be someone's tire marks on the side of my car. My car is also more important to me than some stupid place in a race that doesn't even matter.
![Smilie](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/smilies/smile.gif)
IMHO if the other person is in control and I'm in control we can race pretty darned close. If we are driving in a straight line (such as braking before a corner), what's the big deal? I can drive straight and I think the other guy can with no problems. As for someone taking the inside line and preventing turn-in, that's racing. I just don't get the objection.
#59
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Originally Posted by Professor Helmüt Tester
I have had to both accept and offer mucho 'mea culpas' for on-track shenanigans. If you're accepting them, it's OK to still be pissed...you don't have to say "OK...don't worry about it". It's a 'learning moment' for those involved...use it as such. I've also gotten drilled and knew instantly that it was purely accidental, and given the appropriate wave to an offered 'Sorry!' wave on track.
It helps to know sign language, apparently, unless you're a telepath.
I think a trip around the paddock apologizing for personal stupidity is possibly more painful than stroking a check..... certainly makes you alot more careful in the future.
No racer should EVER expect payment... its the risk you take... take it like a man... but not to apologize for a f*ckwit move...especially one that causes damage is inexcusable IMHO... that is extremely disrespectful
#60
Burning Brakes
![Default](https://rennlist.com/forums/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Ahhh the mystery of it all. Who is 'Der Professor' ? Inquiring minds want to know.Well...we'll just leave it that way for a while, the reality might be a let-down.
Analog-man - we've never met, but you've probably encountered me on-track with the HRG (or the former VHS) vintage guys, as I've usually made a ~once-a-year~ appearance with them from the late 90's on - several of the HRG regulars know me by my real-life 'nom de guerre' from either racing or when I was a Chief Instructor-weenie at HPDE or racing schools. Clue - I'm on the 'Rock Rookey/Joe Volpe/Peter Baselice' end of the grid, rather than in 'smoking little small-bore'-land. You and I were in different race groups at the SCCA Nat'l at the Glen this year...but was kinda busy as was also a 'moderately High Muckety-Muck' that weekend. Don't think our paths have crossed other than that.
Held/hold licenses with SCCA, SCCA Pro, Midwest Council, NASA, EMRA, CASC and some esoterically weird motorcycle road race clubs (some in Canada, even !). Counted 24 different race sanction #'s in 2004, including two 12 hours and a 13 hour, and I probably missed a few. Sick, huh ?
There are some here who know me personally. Some who don't would probably only say 'oh...that a$$hole !' if/when they found out. Mr. Sunday Driver knows my antics up close, and we've even raced together, but just once, I think...that weird ALMS/Trans-Am/Nat'l weekend at Mid-O a few years ago ? I'll claim I beat him....he'll claim he beat me...real story is that neither of us were on the podium.
The mystery continues. As does the drivel that I offer as 'wisdom'. Har.
Analog-man - we've never met, but you've probably encountered me on-track with the HRG (or the former VHS) vintage guys, as I've usually made a ~once-a-year~ appearance with them from the late 90's on - several of the HRG regulars know me by my real-life 'nom de guerre' from either racing or when I was a Chief Instructor-weenie at HPDE or racing schools. Clue - I'm on the 'Rock Rookey/Joe Volpe/Peter Baselice' end of the grid, rather than in 'smoking little small-bore'-land. You and I were in different race groups at the SCCA Nat'l at the Glen this year...but was kinda busy as was also a 'moderately High Muckety-Muck' that weekend. Don't think our paths have crossed other than that.
Held/hold licenses with SCCA, SCCA Pro, Midwest Council, NASA, EMRA, CASC and some esoterically weird motorcycle road race clubs (some in Canada, even !). Counted 24 different race sanction #'s in 2004, including two 12 hours and a 13 hour, and I probably missed a few. Sick, huh ?
There are some here who know me personally. Some who don't would probably only say 'oh...that a$$hole !' if/when they found out. Mr. Sunday Driver knows my antics up close, and we've even raced together, but just once, I think...that weird ALMS/Trans-Am/Nat'l weekend at Mid-O a few years ago ? I'll claim I beat him....he'll claim he beat me...real story is that neither of us were on the podium.
The mystery continues. As does the drivel that I offer as 'wisdom'. Har.