Notices
Racing & Drivers Education Forum
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Any place to test drive nonstreet legal car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-05-2018, 02:36 PM
  #16  
bpu699
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bpu699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: racine, wisconsin
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mark kibort
you can get a day permit from the DMV in california for free saying that you are driving it to a shop to get ready for compliance.. you might want to try that.
Never heard of that? Does that work even if the car isn't road registered or have plates? Do they just go off the VIN?
Old 04-05-2018, 02:40 PM
  #17  
bpu699
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bpu699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: racine, wisconsin
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jscott82
My bigger fear is insurance. Would your insurance cover you if something were to happen? I can handle a $100 ticket, I don't think I can pocket a 1mm lawsuit if I accidentally injure someone.
I would think the risk driving down a side street at 20mph is pretty low... but you never know.

I just wonder what happens if a cop someone comes across your path. Do they confiscate or tow the vehicle, since it isn't road legal? I would be happy to go around the block.

May just goto the track super early, and hope for the best. Bring lots of tools...
Old 04-05-2018, 04:24 PM
  #18  
StoogeMoe
Rennlist Member
 
StoogeMoe's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Poconos PA
Posts: 2,752
Received 106 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

I can only envision the worst possible scenario. You might only be driving 20mph down the street and a kid runs out in front of you and you hit him. You're driving a race car and suddenly everyone believes you were speeding doing 80mph. All your net worth is gone. It's just not worth the risk on the street imo.
Old 04-05-2018, 05:29 PM
  #19  
ace37
Rennlist Member
 
ace37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,938
Received 133 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

I guess I figure we all take a similar risk in our street cars every day. Depending upon the details, a theoretical “he ran over my kid” personal lawsuit may not be covered or may only be partially covered by auto insurance. Hard to say when it’s just a what if.

My coworker was driving in city traffic and a girl suddenly darted across the street through moving traffic and ran directly into the side (near the bed) of his pickup truck. She was unhurt and I’m not sure she was sober at the time - it was strange. I’m probably forgetting details, but the relevant bit is that years went by and days before the statute of limitations arrived she sued. His auto insurance provided a defense attorney, and the attorney told him he felt her case was without merit so he was going to take a risk fighting hard to establish precedent. Furthermore, if they lost, any judgment would be outside of the scope of his coverage. While they were assigned to his defense, the lawyer made it very clear that he represented the interests of the insurance company, not the insured. And if he wanted his own lawyer, that was fine, but that cost would be out of pocket. I think in the end he won and that was the end of it, but it could have been ugly.

The point is we can’t address all risks. We have to just decide what’s reasonable and go from there. A street sedan based race car driving near the house at 20mph just doesn’t sound especially dangerous to me, but to each his own.
Old 04-05-2018, 06:30 PM
  #20  
jscott82
Rennlist Member
 
jscott82's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 3,076
Received 363 Likes on 238 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ace37
I guess I figure we all take a similar risk in our street cars every day. Depending upon the details, a theoretical “he ran over my kid” personal lawsuit may not be covered or may only be partially covered by auto insurance. Hard to say when it’s just a what if.

My coworker was driving in city traffic and a girl suddenly darted across the street through moving traffic and ran directly into the side (near the bed) of his pickup truck. She was unhurt and I’m not sure she was sober at the time - it was strange. I’m probably forgetting details, but the relevant bit is that years went by and days before the statute of limitations arrived she sued. His auto insurance provided a defense attorney, and the attorney told him he felt her case was without merit so he was going to take a risk fighting hard to establish precedent. Furthermore, if they lost, any judgment would be outside of the scope of his coverage. While they were assigned to his defense, the lawyer made it very clear that he represented the interests of the insurance company, not the insured. And if he wanted his own lawyer, that was fine, but that cost would be out of pocket. I think in the end he won and that was the end of it, but it could have been ugly.

The point is we can’t address all risks. We have to just decide what’s reasonable and go from there. A street sedan based race car driving near the house at 20mph just doesn’t sound especially dangerous to me, but to each his own.
I was actually referring to the thought of "borrowing" some plates and taking it on the open road as suggested. Even if the plates are "legal" would your insurance be in force like it would if you were in a rental or a friends car...
Old 04-05-2018, 08:42 PM
  #21  
aryork
Rennlist Member
 
aryork's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: where it gets hot in summer
Posts: 961
Received 158 Likes on 91 Posts
Default

I think ExMB is volunteering to test drive it for you.

Beyond that, I'd be tempted to go places like you listed - the mall at midnight, etc. I can't imagine a cop ticketing you in an empty parking lot, but if they did, it could be a major problem down the road since you also have kids. I have 3 boys and was stupid enough to get a ticket going 100+ mph. After a couple other events, my insurance company cancels the comp and collision on me. The worst part was my wife had to find another insurance company. You can guess how that went!
Old 04-05-2018, 11:26 PM
  #22  
ace37
Rennlist Member
 
ace37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,938
Received 133 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by jscott82
I was actually referring to the thought of "borrowing" some plates and taking it on the open road as suggested. Even if the plates are "legal" would your insurance be in force like it would if you were in a rental or a friends car...
Ah ok, yeah that might look stolen rolling around town and would be another matter entirely.
Old 04-05-2018, 11:38 PM
  #23  
rlm328
Rennlist Member
 
rlm328's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 6,305
Received 309 Likes on 206 Posts
Default

Put it on a trailer and take it to a mechanic that you know and trust. Pay him to run a bumper to bumper inspection on it. He will be able to tell more than a test drive in a parking lot or a neighborhood. He can also modify it to fit you or your son..
Old 04-06-2018, 11:05 PM
  #24  
9114609048
Racer
 
9114609048's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 384
Received 290 Likes on 118 Posts
Default One Trip Permit

Originally Posted by bpu699
Never heard of that? Does that work even if the car isn't road registered or have plates? Do they just go off the VIN?
I used One Trip Permits often. I this case I had to get my '74 3.0 RSR IMSA race car to San Jose and didn't have a trailer. Had a lot of adventures with that car on the road, but that was when CA wasn't so crowded and cops were OK.

Old 04-08-2018, 10:56 PM
  #25  
bpu699
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
bpu699's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: racine, wisconsin
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ace37
I guess I figure we all take a similar risk in our street cars every day. Depending upon the details, a theoretical “he ran over my kid” personal lawsuit may not be covered or may only be partially covered by auto insurance. Hard to say when it’s just a what if.

My coworker was driving in city traffic and a girl suddenly darted across the street through moving traffic and ran directly into the side (near the bed) of his pickup truck. She was unhurt and I’m not sure she was sober at the time - it was strange. I’m probably forgetting details, but the relevant bit is that years went by and days before the statute of limitations arrived she sued. His auto insurance provided a defense attorney, and the attorney told him he felt her case was without merit so he was going to take a risk fighting hard to establish precedent. Furthermore, if they lost, any judgment would be outside of the scope of his coverage. While they were assigned to his defense, the lawyer made it very clear that he represented the interests of the insurance company, not the insured. And if he wanted his own lawyer, that was fine, but that cost would be out of pocket. I think in the end he won and that was the end of it, but it could have been ugly.

The point is we can’t address all risks. We have to just decide what’s reasonable and go from there. A street sedan based race car driving near the house at 20mph just doesn’t sound especially dangerous to me, but to each his own.

Well, hypothetically speaking, I may have taken it down the block to the end of the culdesac and back... Hypothetically, steering wheel was a about 20 degrees of center, all else fine...

your post above is interesting...

why wouldnt the insurance companies lawyer be required to represent the interest of their client, your friend? And, why wouldn't the insurance be on the hook for liability?

isnt auto insurance occurrence based? IE, if the accident happened, even if suit is years later and youre no longer insured, youre covered. If that weren't the case, none of us could ever change carriers without buying tail insurance...
Old 04-09-2018, 12:31 PM
  #26  
ace37
Rennlist Member
 
ace37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: SLC, Utah
Posts: 1,938
Received 133 Likes on 84 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by bpu699
your post above is interesting...

why wouldnt the insurance companies lawyer be required to represent the interest of their client, your friend? And, why wouldn't the insurance be on the hook for liability?

isnt auto insurance occurrence based? IE, if the accident happened, even if suit is years later and youre no longer insured, youre covered. If that weren't the case, none of us could ever change carriers without buying tail insurance...
I believe the core issue was it was a civil suit. They provided a lawyer to represent him but would not pay civil judgments. That much I can understand. But the said the lawyer was fighting for the insurance firm’s interests first. I’d have to ask a lawyer why that might be the case. We have quite a few on the board, perhaps one can provide a bit of insight into what may explain the scenario? I was quite surprised too.

The colleague is not a fool but it’s possible his story missed/skipped a key detail.
Old 04-09-2018, 12:48 PM
  #27  
MUSSBERGER
uninformed gas bag
(contemplating on whether gas bag is one or two words)
Rennlist Member
 
MUSSBERGER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Melbourne Beach
Posts: 20,514
Received 171 Likes on 125 Posts
Default

A race shop I'm familiar with (Frank too) throws a dealer plate on the back.
Old 04-09-2018, 02:38 PM
  #28  
911ted
Instructor
 
911ted's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 181
Received 39 Likes on 24 Posts
Default

Ask the indian tribal police to work with you at a nearby indian reservation. Show them how you use their casino's and have kinda paid for the right.
Heard of this taking place in New Mexico



Quick Reply: Any place to test drive nonstreet legal car?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:33 AM.