Notices
Macan 2014-Current

New or Certified

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-01-2016, 12:41 PM
  #1  
Mark Dreyer
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark Dreyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 4,922
Received 635 Likes on 345 Posts
Default New or Certified

Anticipating A buyback on my 2010 Touareg TDI, I am looking at the Macan as a possible replacement. I thought I'd ask for opinions on a new base Macan vs a 2015 S CPO model.

The price point would be comparable. I don't care about straight line acceleration so was wondering if there are any compelling reason to choose the turbo 4 over the 6 or visa-versa? My Touareg has 120k miles and I had planned to shoot for at least 200k. My point is I keep my DD a long time. So probably any depreciation savings inherent in buying used wouldn't be as significant on a vehicle I keep a long time. As such I'm leaning towards new.

Any comments appreciated!
Old 12-01-2016, 06:25 PM
  #2  
NC TRACKRAT
Rennlist Member
 
NC TRACKRAT's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Winston-Salem, NC
Posts: 3,947
Received 427 Likes on 271 Posts
Default

A well-equipped, low-mileage 2015 S would get my vote.
Old 12-02-2016, 06:09 PM
  #3  
hierlevelz
Cruisin'
 
hierlevelz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

OP if straight line performance matters not then buy the New Base model assuming the price point is the same and similarly equipped.
Old 12-03-2016, 01:03 AM
  #4  
Patrick3000
Rennlist Member
 
Patrick3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,267
Received 442 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

I went with the base nicely equipped for about the same $$$ as the CPO S
Old 12-03-2016, 08:33 AM
  #5  
Mark Dreyer
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark Dreyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 4,922
Received 635 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Patrick3000
I went with the base nicely equipped for about the same $$$ as the CPO S
How do you like it? Any regrets not opting for a 6?
Old 12-03-2016, 01:00 PM
  #6  
clevelandporsche
Banned
 
clevelandporsche's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: North Olmsted, OH
Posts: 505
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 1 Post
Default

Macan:
* Brand new
* Easy to find one with the colors and options you desire
* Better fuel economy


CPO Macan S:
* 100k warranty
* Better performance
* Better sound
* Likely a better ultimate resale value due to an all-Porsche powertrain
Old 12-03-2016, 02:26 PM
  #7  
Patrick3000
Rennlist Member
 
Patrick3000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,267
Received 442 Likes on 244 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Dreyer
How do you like it? Any regrets not opting for a 6?
I'll let you know next month, it arrives late January. My other P - car is a GT4 and I wasn't looking for performance just a fun DD. I suspect the 2.0 will be an improvement over the Honda Accord that it replaces
Old 12-03-2016, 02:48 PM
  #8  
Mark Dreyer
Addict
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Mark Dreyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Orlando, Florida
Posts: 4,922
Received 635 Likes on 345 Posts
Default

I just test drove both this morning. I could be happy with either, and would probably choose the S. If as my sales advisor suggested might happen, the Cayenne diesels become available at 20% off with a CPO warranty, that might be a tough deal to turn away from.
Old 12-05-2016, 09:53 AM
  #9  
disden
Drifting
 
disden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Indiana
Posts: 2,444
Received 956 Likes on 427 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Mark Dreyer
I just test drove both this morning. I could be happy with either, and would probably choose the S. If as my sales advisor suggested might happen, the Cayenne diesels become available at 20% off with a CPO warranty, that might be a tough deal to turn away from.
a few things:
1. Macan base has updated nav, pcm which is massive improvement vs a used S with old system.
2. If you drive a lot, the CPO miles are a nice piece of mind.
3. I bought a 16 CPO S recently for a DD. Its great for cruising, but it's NOT quick. Personally it feels much slower then what's advertised, and mine is loaded with all the goodies.
4. My wife has Cayenne Diesel. Great vehicle, more space for sure if needed. Gas mileage if fantastic if that's a concern. I'm always at the pump with my Macan S, mileage is awful for such a small vehicle. I will say that the Macan feels more solid, more tossable. However neither is a sports car, as others seems to imply!

Good luck, can't make a bad choice!
Old 12-05-2016, 02:52 PM
  #10  
jeff968
Rennlist Member
 
jeff968's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 4,531
Received 172 Likes on 118 Posts
Default

We are very happy with our 4 cylinder Macan. You could order one and configure it to your exact specifications. Great performance and MPG. I just did my first oil change on it a couple of weekends ago.
Old 12-06-2016, 06:14 PM
  #11  
Jafetica888
Advanced
 
Jafetica888's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 74
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by disden
a few things: 1. Macan base has updated nav, pcm which is massive improvement vs a used S with old system. 2. If you drive a lot, the CPO miles are a nice piece of mind. 3. I bought a 16 CPO S recently for a DD. Its great for cruising, but it's NOT quick. Personally it feels much slower then what's advertised, and mine is loaded with all the goodies. 4. My wife has Cayenne Diesel. Great vehicle, more space for sure if needed. Gas mileage if fantastic if that's a concern. I'm always at the pump with my Macan S, mileage is awful for such a small vehicle. I will say that the Macan feels more solid, more tossable. However neither is a sports car, as others seems to imply! Good luck, can't make a bad choice!
What mpg do you get?
Old 12-06-2016, 08:25 PM
  #12  
Oliver911
Advanced
 
Oliver911's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Location: Pgh
Posts: 92
Received 13 Likes on 8 Posts
Default

Just faced the same decision a month ago...

The updated PCM plus the ability to equip it as I like lead me to a new base Macan. The 2.0 is fine for a daily driver and road trip vehicle. Mileage is good, it's quiet, and it is has plenty of pep in sport mode. I don't regret anything about my decision.
Old 12-20-2016, 09:44 PM
  #13  
plantagenet
Track Day
 
plantagenet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Middleton - North of Boston
Posts: 15
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Doesn't seem like you save much buying a used Macan S. Looking at a car online which was 64 new and now 2 years later and 18000 miles is still 56k....

I can pick up a Cayenne diesel one year older and 2k less miles for 42. Intrigued to see how well prices hold up on Macan over next 8 to 9 months seems like prices are holding as though these cars were still hard to get hold off. To put that in comparison to another car i am considering a GLA45 AMG same price as the Macan s when new and now sits at 44k and has only 8k miles on it.
Old 12-26-2016, 03:45 PM
  #14  
FeralComprehension
Rennlist Member
 
FeralComprehension's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Detroit (Rock City); 1990 C4
Posts: 1,710
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Been looking at these lately; the GTS package is pretty interesting in that it's got a different suspension cal than either the S or the Turbo.



Quick Reply: New or Certified



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:34 PM.