When you click on links to various merchants on this site and make a purchase, this can result in this site earning a commission. Affiliate programs and affiliations include, but are not limited to, the eBay Partner Network.
Used this little guy at COTA for predicive lap times. Really simple box that does a good job showing times etc. I thought this installation idea may help. I'm 6'5" tall and used the upper holes in the stearing wheel to mount it. You have to drill and champfer new holes in the AIM mount as well as cut the lateral tabs off the mount, but works well and easy to see. The lateral tabs will hit the speed and alarm switches if not removed.
If your "normal" height then use the lower holes and don't have to modify the bracket other than drill new holes.
Rennlist Hoonigan which cost no drachmas Lifetime Rennlist Member
Rennlist Site Sponsor
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 13,035
Likes: 1,210
From: Manchester, NH
Originally Posted by Cory M
Okay for lap timer only but won't work if you want to download the G loads. The accelerometers will be activated by you turning the wheel.
If it's a regular solo and is calculating the G forces off the GPS, it should still work. I haven't tried it, but it's worth trying out. They mount them on motorcycle handlebars all the time.
From: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Originally Posted by Matt Romanowski
If it's a regular solo and is calculating the G forces off the GPS, it should still work.
That works!
__________________ -Peter Krause www.peterkrause.net www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
Interesting. I assumed the G loads came from the accelerometers like the other AIM products, not GPS. If they aren't using the sensors for G loads than why have them at all?
I called AIM for some clarification, the first guy I spoke to said he didn't recommend mounting on the steering wheel because "it would mess up the GPS". That didn't make a lot of sense to me to so I spoke to someone on the tech line who was very helpful.
He said that the accelerometers aren't in there anymore (contrary to the product info online). Apparently they had trouble keeping the accelerometer orientation in line with the Race Studio software because of all the different mounting options. The GPS is used for accelerations and track mapping. However they strongly recommend against mounting on the steering wheel because the GPS antenna is located on the top of the unit and turning the wheel can affect the satellite retention. If the wheel is turned and loses contact with the satellite it will essentially create a straight line between the points and "dramatically skew the laptimes and predictive capability". So it may work but depending on the track location and how your wheel is turned it could screw things up.
At COTA lap times were identical to Motec GPS times. Predictive lap times worked fine... I suspect even with a momentary loss of GPS is wheel is turned the laps are the same lap to lap (unless you spin). Thus a lap with the wheel turned and GPS filling it in is still the same time and prediction lap to lap... so works fine.
We use the Motec for segment data analysis and didn't even load the AIM software so no ideal if the track map is accurate etc. Just wanted predictive lap times which works great on the wheel.
From: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Originally Posted by boothkc
At COTA lap times were identical to Motec GPS times. Predictive lap times worked fine... Just wanted predictive lap times which works great on the wheel.
KB
I have half a dozen clients who have them on the wheel in karts, Spec: Race Atom and others and their experience is the same as yours. Works fine and is perfectly accurate.
Accelerative loads are easily calculated by the change in velocity over travel along an axis or radius. It's a simple math calculation. As long as the sample rate is good and the smoothing is adequate, works well.
Racelogic (Video VBox) uses only this. So does the AiM MXL for braking and acceleration forces calculated from wheel speed. MXL Pista and Pro have LatG accelerometer ONLY... Always been that way.
The Solo may have accelerometers in it, but they're not enabled for those fifty-plus units I've sold since a firmware change several years ago. My Belgian friend is lucky!
How can you tell if the accelerometers are being used? I bought two Solo's when they first came out in late 2011 so they should be the first generation, I haven't updated the firmware. I would think a direct measurement with an accelerometer would be more accurate than deriving accelerations from GPS.
Nice that it appears to work on the steering wheel. That's how I had the Mychron on my Kart mounted and it was convenient.
From: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
The GPS G calc is only limited by the sampling rate. Not a big deal.
Simple to see if the early Solo logs accelerometer data. Take a sample of data, download it, open RS2 and it'll be listed on the measures listing on the left side as acc laterale or accel longitudinale or accel_x_axis, accel_y_axis or something like that for actual measures. It'll be GPS_Lat_ G and GPS_Long_G for the synthetically calculated measures. The later firmware issues are ten times better than the early releases, adding more features and accuracy.
I have not seen a driver that could not improve their braking technique using a Solo or Solo DL.
The GPS G calc is only limited by the sampling rate. Not a big deal.
Simple to see if the early Solo logs accelerometer data. Take a sample of data, download it, open RS2 and it'll be listed on the measures listing on the left side as acc laterale or accel longitudinale or accel_x_axis, accel_y_axis or something like that for actual measures. It'll be GPS_Lat_ G and GPS_Long_G for the synthetically calculated measures. The later firmware issues are ten times better than the early releases, adding more features and accuracy.
I have not seen a driver that could not improve their braking technique using a Solo or Solo DL.
Thanks. Looks like my loads are coming from the accelerometer and not the GPS then.
I'd plug into the SOLO and use "online" with RS 2 and see if the acceronmeters change as you rotate the unit, which will mean that it is accelerometer vs GPS. I believe the early SOLO used the accelerometers and later (maybe due to the firmware revision) they hid the real accelerometers and used GPS acceleration calcs. The SOLO DL definitely uses the accelerometers.
From: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Originally Posted by amso3
I believe the early SOLO used the accelerometers and later (due to the firmware revision) they hid the real accelerometers and used GPS acceleration calcs. The SOLO DL definitely uses the accelerometers.
Theon Goes Full Carbon Fiber With Stunning New Build
Slideshow: Built around a carbon-bodied 964 and a naturally aspirated 4.0-liter flat-six, this bespoke commission highlights how far the restomod formula has evolved.
Tuner Is Converting Porsche 911s Into Shooting Brakes
Slideshow: A Polish Porsche specialist is moving ahead with one of the most unusual 911 conversions in recent memory: a shooting brake version of the 991-generation sports car.
This Coachbuilt Creation Is A Modern Take on the Legendary Porsche 917
Slideshow: A Porsche Carrera GT has been transformed into a one-off coachbuilt machine that blends analog supercar engineering with styling inspired by the legendary 917 race cars.
Is This Convertible Cayenne A Steal, Or A Returnless Investment?
Slideshow: A heavily modified Porsche Cayenne convertible with faux wood trim and a long list of flaws recently sold at auction for surprisingly little money.
Porsche's Top 5 Most Questionable Naming Decisions
Slideshow: For a company obsessed with engineering precision, Porsche has occasionally named its cars in ways that left even loyal enthusiasts scratching their heads.
Pogea Racing's 964 Porsche 911 Reimagination Stands Out in a Crowded Field
Slideshow: Pogea Racing's latest Porsche 964 project blends carbon-fiber construction, modern chassis upgrades, and up to 500 horsepower while keeping the air-cooled 911 experience firmly analog.