Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Car and Driver says Cayman S laps VIR in the same time as a Carrera S

Old 01-05-2010, 10:38 PM
  #1  
Maxhouse97
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Maxhouse97's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 419
Received 68 Likes on 25 Posts
Default Car and Driver says Cayman S laps VIR in the same time as a Carrera S

Latest issue - the annual lightning lap article (which I love). Same times with a 60 hp deficit. The better the Cayman looks, the worse the 911 does. And this is coming from a 911 owner (albeit an old one).

If Porsche produces a Cayman Clubsport in the same mold as the Boxster Spyder, I'm there. I wonder if Piech (who left Porsche early on in the 911's life and is a techno nut) and VW will be as protective of the 911 as others. I think the 911s are going to be hurting in ALMS next year. Too much competition. Keep your eye on the Corvettes...
Old 01-06-2010, 04:48 AM
  #2  
Ghostcloak
Advanced
 
Ghostcloak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Raleigh, NC
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Here's a link:
http://www.caranddriver.com/features...p_2009-feature

Introduction
LL1: 2010 Volkswagen GTI > 3:19.3
LL1: 2009 Mini Cooper John Cooper Works > 3:17.1
LL1: 2009 Subaru Impreza WRX > 3:16.6
LL1: 2010 Mazdaspeed 3 > 3:16.2
LL1: 2010 Hyundai Genesis Coupe 3.8 > 3:14.8
LL1: 2010 Ford Mustang GT > 3:13.3
LL2: 2009 Nissan NISMO 370Z > 3:12.0
LL2: 2010 Audi S4 > 3:10.8
LL2: 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS > 3:09.5
LL2: 2009 Audi TTS > 3:08.4
LL2: 2010 Ford Mustang Shelby GT500 > 3:07.4
LL2: 2009 BMW M3 > 3:05.4
LL2: 2010 Chevrolet Corvette Grand Sport > 2:58.8
LL3: 2010 Jaguar XKR > 3:06.4
LL3: 2009 Porsche 911 Carrera S > 3:05.8
LL3: 2009 Porsche Cayman S > 3:05.8
LL3: 2009 Lotus Exige S 260 Sport > 3:05.0
LL3: 2009 Chevrolet Corvette ZR1 > 2:51.8
LL4: 2010 Audi R8 5.2 FSI > 2:59.5
LL5: 2010 Lamborghini Murciélago LP670-4 SV > 2:53.9
LLU: Ariel Atom 3 > 2:57.6 and KTM X-Bow > 2:52.3
Old 01-06-2010, 02:25 PM
  #3  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I think it is a good showing by the Cayman S! Only 0.4 seconds slower than the M3. (being down on power by 90hps+?! granted M3 is quite a bit heavier)

I think the Carrera S can probably go a little bit faster, though.. but I am guessing that the none of the test drivers were too familiar w/ the 911's rear engine dynamic?!
Old 01-06-2010, 02:59 PM
  #4  
krenshaw
Track Day
 
krenshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cfjan
I think the Carrera S can probably go a little bit faster, though.. but I am guessing that the none of the test drivers were too familiar w/ the 911's rear engine dynamic?!
+1 on that. Even though C&D noted that they used 2 drivers to try and beat the Cayman (who both ended up with the same lap times), it definitely seems to be a case of '2 wrongs don't make a right.' The brief review certainly made it sound like they were quite uncomfortable driving the 997.

On the other hand, it really is great to see the Cayman up on that chart where it belongs. One thing I'm curious about is if this Cayman had the LSD option or not.

Last edited by krenshaw; 01-06-2010 at 06:52 PM. Reason: Because I can't read...
Old 01-06-2010, 04:54 PM
  #5  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

?! R8 V10 did not beat ZR-1, I think... ?! ZR-1 had the fast time of the day, I think..
Old 01-06-2010, 05:19 PM
  #6  
Riz
Rennlist Member
 
Riz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

They did not even put the new GT3 3.8L in the test. They were also missing the Miata. Those two cars should be on any test of sports cars IMO.
Old 01-06-2010, 06:51 PM
  #7  
krenshaw
Track Day
 
krenshaw's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Connecticut
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cfjan
?! R8 V10 did not beat ZR-1, I think... ?! ZR-1 had the fast time of the day, I think..
Wow... guess it's time for me to schedule another eye Dr. appointment. You're right, I glanced at the list and didn't read it very well.
Old 01-06-2010, 07:12 PM
  #8  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

I think the biggest embarrassment was the NISMO 370Z.. I mean, the brake completely went out and the car hit the wall.. OUCH!

For some reasons, the Nissan (the Z, not the GT-R) has never done too well in the brake department in magazine test.. similar fade was recorded in a brake comparison.. I was really surprised back then, as the 350Z Track at the time had Brembo 4-pot up front.. which isn't too bad..

It was either the pads or the fluid that's used by Nissan..
Old 01-06-2010, 10:56 PM
  #9  
Jim Michaels
Rennlist Member
 
Jim Michaels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

C&D said the 370Z's pads were the low noise/low dust pads rather than their more track oriented pads (a dealer installed option).

Riz: They tested the Miata and the GT3 in previous Lightning Laps (LL). The Miata turned a 3:29.3 in 2006 (the slowest time ever), and the GT3 turned a 3:01.8 in 2007. The quickest ever time was in a Mosler MT900S in the 2008 LL (2:45.9). I counted 76 cars tested in LL so far.
Old 01-07-2010, 03:36 PM
  #10  
jason952
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
jason952's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Florence, SC
Posts: 2,422
Received 26 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

where was the GTR?
Old 01-07-2010, 04:48 PM
  #11  
Jim Michaels
Rennlist Member
 
Jim Michaels's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Location: Blacksburg, VA
Posts: 2,040
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Nissan GT-R (with all-season tires) clocked at 2:59.0 in 2008.
Old 01-08-2010, 03:50 PM
  #12  
95spiderman
Burning Brakes
 
95spiderman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: ny
Posts: 919
Received 148 Likes on 95 Posts
Default

more interesting is that 07 tt was only .2 sec faster than the new cayman/911. must be due to pdk so new tt with pdk probably much quicker
Old 01-08-2010, 06:41 PM
  #13  
Riz
Rennlist Member
 
Riz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: USA
Posts: 1,695
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 27 Posts
Default

Thanks Jim - was that the 3.6L GT3 997 Mk1? It had to be, I was hoping they tried the new 3.8L version which would probably be under 3 min. I hope they test the RS when it comes out.
Old 01-08-2010, 07:32 PM
  #14  
cfjan
Rennlist Member
 
cfjan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Sunnyvale, CA
Posts: 2,808
Likes: 0
Received 33 Likes on 9 Posts
Default

But judging from the Carrera S' time, I am not so sure if they are too familiar w/ the rear-engine chassis dynamic. So I don't know if they will get a great time w/ the RS! They need to get some drivers w/ experience w/ 911.. any of those Porsche factory drivers will do.. !!
Old 01-10-2010, 02:42 PM
  #15  
10 GT3
Drifting
 
10 GT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 2,206
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

One thing would certainly make a difference is how each is equipped. Both were PDKs. Did the Carrera S have the PASM Sport Suspension (M030 supension + LSD) and did the Cayman have an LSD? In other words, were they the best versions of each?

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Quick Reply: Car and Driver says Cayman S laps VIR in the same time as a Carrera S



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 07:36 AM.