Notices
987 Forum Discussion about the Cayman/Boxster variants (2004-2012)
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by:

Price of new Cayman (not S) = $4400 more than similar Boxster

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-31-2006, 12:23 AM
  #31  
Giantviper
Burning Brakes
 
Giantviper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Northern New Jersey
Posts: 1,137
Received 13 Likes on 11 Posts
Default

The problem is that in every other car porsche ahs made along with every other car any car manufacturor has made the rag tops are always more money then the coupe becuase of the cost of the rag top and the motors inviolved in it. We all know both the Cayman and Boxter ahve the same internal number in the porsche factory, 987. That means the factory recognizes the Cayman as a Boxter Coupe. So every one with a senseable mind is asking y would a coupe ever be more money then the rag top? Maybe its just me but i have noticed an excess of Caymans sitting at the porsche dealers in my area and i bet it is becuase of that exact reason. Coupes are always faster then convertables so that is not a good reason to make the coupe more money.

Do not get me wrong I think they are awsome cars (I ahve yet to ride in one but hear they are great to drive) I just think the price point with the rag top less money is killing the car.
Old 05-31-2006, 07:36 PM
  #32  
mborkow
Drifting
 
mborkow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 2,168
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

porsche was able to offset part of the R&D costs of the boxster by using the same technology on the 996. if there is no similar way to offset the re-engineering required for the cayman, then the cayman would end up being more expensive.
Old 05-31-2006, 09:59 PM
  #33  
fast1
Race Car
 
fast1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 3,899
Received 220 Likes on 146 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mborkow
porsche was able to offset part of the R&D costs of the boxster by using the same technology on the 996. if there is no similar way to offset the re-engineering required for the cayman, then the cayman would end up being more expensive.
You could be right, but I believe that it's more likely that Porsche bases its pricing policy on what they think the market will bear.
Old 06-01-2006, 10:29 AM
  #34  
MikeBat
Rennlist Member
 
MikeBat's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,121
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by Michael Russell
Exige as well.

We have to compare apples with apples. Otherwise, we venture into the hypothetical end of the debate.

A 2.7 Boxster with stock suspension and brakes vs a Cayman equipped similarly is not the same as an Elise vs Exige. The Exige has a lot more track equipement and a tweaked motor. Same for the Viper I believe.

That said... add me to the chorus of folks saying that the Cayman S and Cayman price strategies are upside down and somehow insulting.

I would not want to read a 350Z vs Cayman comparo.... it would hurt my soul.
350Z $28k coupe, 300hp, 0-60 5.8s......
Cayman $49,400 coupe, 240hp 5.9s

Last edited by MikeBat; 06-01-2006 at 11:12 AM.
Old 06-01-2006, 08:33 PM
  #35  
SciFrog
Racer
 
SciFrog's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: NY
Posts: 261
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

It is amazing they can actually sell the Cayman over a Boxster... More amazing is that people buy them... It has been proven many times now, the Cayman is just a Boster with a fixed roof, developpement cost must have been super low considering how many parts the Boxster and Cayman share...
Old 06-02-2006, 01:49 AM
  #36  
Dan V
Race Car
 
Dan V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: San Jose Kalifornia Demokratische Republik
Posts: 3,916
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

I'm sure that anyone who has bought a Cayman will assure you that it is a completely new design, and any resemblance to a Boxster is completely coincidental (like the resemblance of Porsche Cayenne V6 to VW Touareg V6)

Originally Posted by SciFrog
It is amazing they can actually sell the Cayman over a Boxster... More amazing is that people buy them... It has been proven many times now, the Cayman is just a Boster with a fixed roof, developpement cost must have been super low considering how many parts the Boxster and Cayman share...
Old 06-02-2006, 08:20 AM
  #37  
Doug&Julie
Addict
Rennlist Member

 
Doug&Julie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: The Beave, OR
Posts: 5,871
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by SciFrog
It has been proven many times now, the Cayman is just a Boster with a fixed roof...
Not true. Fixing a hard top to the Boxster chassis meant the whole car had to be re-developed. A coupe is far more rigid than a convertible, so the suspension can be tuned very differently...far more stiffly than a convertible suspension. Then add in the completely different 3.4 motor that has the Vario-Cam and we're talking about a different automobile. In fact, I read a review where Porsche said the Cayman S is "more 911 than Boxster".
Old 06-02-2006, 01:16 PM
  #38  
TheOtherEric
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
TheOtherEric's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 12,063
Received 35 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Doug&Julie
Not true. Fixing a hard top to the Boxster chassis meant the whole car had to be re-developed. A coupe is far more rigid than a convertible, so the suspension can be tuned very differently...far more stiffly than a convertible suspension. Then add in the completely different 3.4 motor that has the Vario-Cam and we're talking about a different automobile. In fact, I read a review where Porsche said the Cayman S is "more 911 than Boxster".
Sorry but I find your argument (that Cayman is not a Boxster) lacks any support at all.

1) "Retuning" the suspension means nothing more than slightly different springs and shocks. Big deal. Perhaps sway bars too, but again no biggie. No increased costs here.

2) The base cayman's motor appears to be the exact same 2.7L variocam as the base boxster. And besides, an extra 0.2L in the "S" doesn't make it a "different automobile" than the Boxster S.

3) Porsche saying that the Cayman S is "more like 911 than Boxster" is just marketing drivel, pure puffery. Of course they'll say that to help justify the price tag, but it's clearly BS.

The Cayman is a Boxster, even PAG admits that (see press release linked above). Internal designation is the same too.
Old 06-02-2006, 02:02 PM
  #39  
BiggerTwin
Racer
 
BiggerTwin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: New York
Posts: 319
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by TheOtherEric
The Cayman is a Boxster
I have no problem with that since numerous automotive magazines have consistently called the Boxster one of the best handling cars in the world. I personally think Porsche is testing the water to see if people will pay more for a more powerful Boxster coupe. If there are more people like SciFrog than me, the Cayman will be a footnote in Porsche history. If there are more people like me, the Cayman could well turn out to be the 3rd coming as Excellence hinted in their test of the new Porsche. Only time will tell which camp is correct and whether Porsche made a pricing mistake or engaged in masterful marketing. They have to tread carefully since they don’t want to hurt their icon 911 until they know they have a better and more profitable car.

Alan



Quick Reply: Price of new Cayman (not S) = $4400 more than similar Boxster



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 01:48 PM.