2015 turbo s depreciation
#16
A 2015 has already taken its largest hit; but it still has a chunk to lose relative to the prices you're seeing the 2011-2013 Turbo S at. I wouldn't look at it that way though. At $80,000 a 2015 Panamera Turbo S is going to destroy about anything on the road, and have pretty much all of the same technology as a 2018 in all but the most premium of models which are starting to use full LED screens for the dash. I'm not even sure I like that idea anyway. The 2010 interior doesn't feel dated to me, the 2015 has a few more features even. The point is, its going to be hard to find a better driving, and more refined car for $80,000 or so than a fully loaded Panamera. Once the asking price gets closer to $100,000 used, I'd be thinking about waiting for the 2017+ model.
You could find a very low mile 2011-2013 for $60,000, and save $20,000 to put down in a couple years on the 2017.......I prefer the looks of the 970 to the 970.1 but the .1 does have some newer infotainment features (360 camera, newer nav, lane and stop assist available, lane sense, etc).
You could find a very low mile 2011-2013 for $60,000, and save $20,000 to put down in a couple years on the 2017.......I prefer the looks of the 970 to the 970.1 but the .1 does have some newer infotainment features (360 camera, newer nav, lane and stop assist available, lane sense, etc).
#17
#19
#20
PCCB was the only doubt I had before purchasing. Pick a stone up between the pad and disc and your looking at a very expensive repair. However after a year with the car PCCB is awesome and I wouldn’t think twice in the future