Notices
Panamera 2010-Current

Looking for some Panamera Turbo Advice

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-28-2018, 06:36 PM
  #1  
CincyScott
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CincyScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,377
Received 82 Likes on 58 Posts
Default Looking for some Panamera Turbo Advice

I have a 2013 Audi S7. It's tuned, lowered, has low miles and is nice to drive. I enjoy the car, but don't looove it. I drove a friend's 2012 Panamera Turbo. His car is loaded, PCCB, PDCC, sport exhaust, active sport seats, 20" wheels, Burmester, etc. Just the handling alone on that car was enough to sway me. His car has 80k miles on it.

Here's my dilemma: I can buy his car from him for $40k. I work from home so I don't put much mileage on anything, maybe 5k a year. Something tells me though that I should buy a Turbo S instead. Yes, I realize the money difference, but I'd like to find a 14-15 Turbo S as well.

What I'm finding is that most Turbo S with relatively low miles (sub 30k) are in the $100k range. I would think in a couple years, they will take a massive depreciation hit (maybe 30k?), which makes me think that's foolish. Any thoughts from the RL community?
Old 08-28-2018, 07:30 PM
  #2  
dwwalker14335
Advanced
 
dwwalker14335's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2018
Posts: 78
Received 37 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

As a question, would you ever tune the 2012 Turbo if you purchased? If so, that would have equivalent performance. If you want to keep it stock for longevity purposes, then the Turbo S would definitely feel a bit more capable. I went the latter route and selected a Turbo S which was also well optioned.
Old 08-28-2018, 08:22 PM
  #3  
CincyScott
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CincyScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,377
Received 82 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by dwwalker14335
As a question, would you ever tune the 2012 Turbo if you purchased? If so, that would have equivalent performance. If you want to keep it stock for longevity purposes, then the Turbo S would definitely feel a bit more capable. I went the latter route and selected a Turbo S which was also well optioned.
if I’m being honest with myself, I will most certainly tune either one
Old 08-28-2018, 08:54 PM
  #4  
c4racer
Pro
 
c4racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 596
Received 53 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Very limited supply so it would come down to what you can find in the color combo you like.
Old 08-29-2018, 01:54 AM
  #5  
armanslr
Rennlist Member
 
armanslr's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2018
Location: Southern California
Posts: 474
Received 173 Likes on 122 Posts
Default

Depends on budget. When I was searching 3 months ago I found a mint 2014 Turbo S with 40K miles for 70K that had a 205K msrp.

It was a beautiful car, but I went with the GTS instead.

Personally, I wouldn’t rush to a decision. If your looking for higher mileage units you will always have plenty of options. Test drive a few panameras, decide which options are a must, then let the search begin!
Old 08-29-2018, 09:00 AM
  #6  
CincyScott
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CincyScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,377
Received 82 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by armanslr
Depends on budget. When I was searching 3 months ago I found a mint 2014 Turbo S with 40K miles for 70K that had a 205K msrp.

It was a beautiful car, but I went with the GTS instead.

Personally, I wouldn’t rush to a decision. If your looking for higher mileage units you will always have plenty of options. Test drive a few panameras, decide which options are a must, then let the search begin!
I’d like to stay sub 50k mileage wise. I’d really like to find a white one with black interior, but the used car factory seems fresh out. Do you guys think the S will hold their values? Cayenne Turbo S’s don’t seem to command much more than a 10% premium.
Old 08-29-2018, 11:33 AM
  #7  
NJS_04_996
Racer
 
NJS_04_996's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 304
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Originally Posted by CincyScott


I’d like to stay sub 50k mileage wise. I’d really like to find a white one with black interior, but the used car factory seems fresh out. Do you guys think the S will hold their values? Cayenne Turbo S’s don’t seem to command much more than a 10% premium.
Well that does go along nicely with the roughly 10% more hp the turbo S would have over the regular turbo. Looking from my V6 perspective, I would be happy with any of the GTS, Turbo and Turbo S cars as they can be outfitted to handle identically, and the hp differences would only really be apparent on the track. So then color, options, mileage and price would be my main buying criteria between any of the V8s. I really wouldn't worry about resale too much, hoping I would keep it for many years, and yes- its a Porsche - even in resale they never come cheap!
Old 08-29-2018, 12:09 PM
  #8  
amelen
Pro
 
amelen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North NJ
Posts: 684
Received 117 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CincyScott
I have a 2013 Audi S7. It's tuned, lowered, has low miles and is nice to drive. I enjoy the car, but don't looove it. I drove a friend's 2012 Panamera Turbo. His car is loaded, PCCB, PDCC, sport exhaust, active sport seats, 20" wheels, Burmester, etc. Just the handling alone on that car was enough to sway me. His car has 80k miles on it.

Here's my dilemma: I can buy his car from him for $40k. I work from home so I don't put much mileage on anything, maybe 5k a year. Something tells me though that I should buy a Turbo S instead. Yes, I realize the money difference, but I'd like to find a 14-15 Turbo S as well.

What I'm finding is that most Turbo S with relatively low miles (sub 30k) are in the $100k range. I would think in a couple years, they will take a massive depreciation hit (maybe 30k?), which makes me think that's foolish. Any thoughts from the RL community?
I'm about to go from a 2016 S6 to a Panamera 4S. You sure you need a Turbo? The 4S, with the right packages, really shines in terms of the feel of a sports car. Against my best judgement, I decided that there wasn't enough of a reason to jump to the Turbo for me. Might be worth test driving a 2017+ 4S. You'll also still have plenty of warranty left on it at that point.
Old 08-29-2018, 01:08 PM
  #9  
CincyScott
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CincyScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,377
Received 82 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by amelen
I'm about to go from a 2016 S6 to a Panamera 4S. You sure you need a Turbo? The 4S, with the right packages, really shines in terms of the feel of a sports car. Against my best judgement, I decided that there wasn't enough of a reason to jump to the Turbo for me. Might be worth test driving a 2017+ 4S. You'll also still have plenty of warranty left on it at that point.
Does anyone really "need" a Turbo? I generally buy used, and am usually looking for something that will hold its value relatively well. It's been my experience that well cared for Turbos of any ilk with Porsche are the better buy long term. However, I admit to liking the body better on the 971's, but it's the same engine I have in an S7 more or less now.
Old 08-29-2018, 01:13 PM
  #10  
amelen
Pro
 
amelen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: North NJ
Posts: 684
Received 117 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by CincyScott
Does anyone really "need" a Turbo? I generally buy used, and am usually looking for something that will hold its value relatively well. It's been my experience that well cared for Turbos of any ilk with Porsche are the better buy long term. However, I admit to liking the body better on the 971's, but it's the same engine I have in an S7 more or less now.
Engine vs. Engine, on-paper, the 4S performs the same as the S7 engine you have. The Turbo would be a couple of levels above that. For me, I love the 4.0T in the Audi, but the Porsche Panamera just handles and feels a lot better, even with the 2.9T.


C/D TEST RESULTS 2017 Panamera 4S 2.9T::
Zero to 60 mph: 3.6 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.3 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 16.7 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 4.8 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.6 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 1.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.1 sec @ 114 mph
Top speed (drag limited, mfr's claim): 179 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 151 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.03 g

C/D TEST RESULTS FOR 2016 S6 4.0T
Zero to 60 mph: 3.9 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.8 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 17.1 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 4.8 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.5 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.3 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.4 sec @ 113 mph
Top speed (governor limited): 153 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 162 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 0.92 g
Curb weight: 4389 lb
C/D observed fuel economy: 17 mpg
Old 08-29-2018, 03:27 PM
  #11  
c4racer
Pro
 
c4racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 596
Received 53 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

And the GTS is 4.0 0-60 and 1/4mi in 12.7 so right in the same ballpark as the S6 and 4S too.
Old 08-29-2018, 04:25 PM
  #12  
Eclipser
Rennlist Member
 
Eclipser's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Posts: 26
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Comes down to feel. The GTS is retaining a higher value than the higher HP Panamera Turbo because it just doesn't feel as good to drive. Difference between an NA V8 and the V6 is rather staggering, all the way down to the exhaust note. I ended up going with the GTS over the Turbo. The Gen 2's also have some noticeable turbo lag.
Old 08-29-2018, 05:38 PM
  #13  
c4racer
Pro
 
c4racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 596
Received 53 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

I would get the GTS for sure. But I'm a NA V8 guy.
Old 08-29-2018, 05:49 PM
  #14  
CincyScott
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
CincyScott's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,377
Received 82 Likes on 58 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Eclipser
Comes down to feel. The GTS is retaining a higher value than the higher HP Panamera Turbo because it just doesn't feel as good to drive. Difference between an NA V8 and the V6 is rather staggering, all the way down to the exhaust note. I ended up going with the GTS over the Turbo. The Gen 2's also have some noticeable turbo lag.
Originally Posted by c4racer
I would get the GTS for sure. But I'm a NA V8 guy.
Yep definitely understand the allure of the GTS. I am a big fan of forced induction, so that's always my preference. I will drive one to see how I feel about it though (assuming I can find one)
Old 08-29-2018, 08:04 PM
  #15  
c4racer
Pro
 
c4racer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 596
Received 53 Likes on 41 Posts
Default

Religious argument for sure. I've tried a few. Not my thing. I raced NA V8 rwd cars for many years so that's the camp I fall into !


Quick Reply: Looking for some Panamera Turbo Advice



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:09 AM.