Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

Most reliable track car?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-01-2017, 02:03 AM
  #16  
bigskyGT3
Burning Brakes
 
bigskyGT3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: MT
Posts: 811
Received 32 Likes on 17 Posts
Default

Mitsu Evo IX? I've never owned one but the 4G63 seemed pretty bullet proof.
Old 01-01-2017, 10:48 AM
  #17  
35Mugen
Instructor
 
35Mugen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: GTA
Posts: 165
Received 37 Likes on 23 Posts
Default

Like several others have already said, dollar for dollar - pound for pound, it's hard to beat the S2000 in terms of fun / reliability / cost as a track car.

I think a lot of the enthusiast owners that have well kept, well modified and well maintained S2000's drive a large percentage of their mileage on the track. Meanwhile the other contingent of S2000 owners might be busy "stancing" their rides to Hella Flush status.

Many tracks miles and never missed a beat...
Old 01-01-2017, 11:08 AM
  #18  
GT4Tony
Racer
 
GT4Tony's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 255
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

Adding E36 M3. Also for me the E46 M3 was solid, rear subframe needs reinforcing if I recall correctly.
Old 01-01-2017, 11:17 AM
  #19  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,638
Received 938 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by MayorAdamWest
I don't agree with your assessment. Yes, a couple people have had issues, but nothing widespread. That's despite people like myself and Orthojoe putting MANY track days on these cars. Joe and Ben even do days where they both drove it. 10+ sessions in a single day. I've personally done something like 40 days, and couple of which were 8-10 sessions. I think they are as rock solid as any track car made from 2015 on.
I guess it must be Texas then. Too many instances of cam issues.
Old 01-01-2017, 11:54 AM
  #20  
Shockwave
Three Wheelin'
 
Shockwave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,570
Received 99 Likes on 36 Posts
Default

No lie... that 3rd gear lovk out and strut tower issue make me nervous.

The cost of consumables is almost double with the Porsche...
Old 01-01-2017, 11:57 AM
  #21  
cox1974
Rennlist Member
 
cox1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Puglia
Posts: 803
Received 121 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

S2000 also for me and then 350Z

Last edited by cox1974; 01-01-2017 at 01:09 PM.
Old 01-01-2017, 12:33 PM
  #22  
texasviany
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
texasviany's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 964
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 35Mugen
Like several others have already said, dollar for dollar - pound for pound, it's hard to beat the S2000 in terms of fun / reliability / cost as a track car.

I think a lot of the enthusiast owners that have well kept, well modified and well maintained S2000's drive a large percentage of their mileage on the track. Meanwhile the other contingent of S2000 owners might be busy "stancing" their rides to Hella Flush status.

Many tracks miles and never missed a beat...
Good looking ride...
Old 01-01-2017, 01:14 PM
  #23  
ChrisF
Rennlist Member
 
ChrisF's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: La La Land
Posts: 4,144
Received 889 Likes on 336 Posts
Default

I echo what golfnutintib said: every car i've tracked has had at least one fatal flaw. If remedied, they have been fine. Limited view:

EVO VIII: 68K miles, 40 ish track days, heavily modded to 100hp over stock for most of it's life. With regular maintenance and consumables, was VERY reliable. Engine was within 1psi across all cylinders at sale; never replaced tranny, diff or anything else. Started throwing heater cores though towards the end.

987.2 Cayman S: 17K miles, 10 track days. Needed brake cooling badly. Overheated in very hot SoCal summer weather. Did not address before sale. Otherwise, add consumables, fluids and drive.

997.2 GT3: 32K miles, 20 ish track days. Had diff built with guard internals, lines pinned. 0 failures on track or otherwise. Most reliable track car I've owned. Still happy and healthy with new owner. Point taken though that if/when it fails, the bills are breathtaking.

GT4: 11K miles; 15 track days. 0 issues and it was not babied.

991 GT3 RS: 10K miles; 6 track days so far and the engine hasn't exploded I tend to think if Trak Car hasn't killed his by now, the hysteria over engine failures may be overstated. Hard to tell with so few getting serious track miles. Time will tell.

My guess as has been already posted, is that the S2K, Miata and E36 would be the most solid, lowest cost to run. Have thought about going that way many times but I just don't enjoy driving those cars as much.
Old 01-01-2017, 01:31 PM
  #24  
Accel Junky
Burning Brakes
 
Accel Junky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Merica
Posts: 949
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 2 Posts
Default

E46 M3 was hit or miss for me. Overheated in the summer on the stock cooling system and had some diff issues. Plus plan to spend big to properly do preventative.

My F80 M3 seemed bullet-proof but only a couple of summer track days tested.

My Fiesta ST tore one CV boot and then overheated in the summer. Seized brakes another track day.
Old 01-01-2017, 04:06 PM
  #25  
cingulus
Racer
 
cingulus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Socal
Posts: 342
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

I have had success with my E90 M3 (over 30 track days and just factory rotors and consumables so far, it is also my daily driver with over 130K miles. It has basic Mods KW3s, rims, intake, tune exhaust, race pipes) and my 2003 350z (20 track days, it has factory Brembo's and Nismo s-tune suspension, again just brakes, rotors and tires).

My GTR (transmission, brake calipers, suspension, fuel pump) and EVO X (overheating etc.) were not reliable for me.

I only did 3 track days in my 991 GT3 with no problems, so not much to judge.

I have not tracked the GT4 yet, first track day will be Jan 21.
Old 01-01-2017, 07:10 PM
  #26  
electron mike
Rennlist Member
 
electron mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,444
Received 618 Likes on 274 Posts
Default

Both my GT4 and F80 M3 have been very reliable on track even in very hot weather. Just fluids, tires, pads, rotors.. rinse and repeat.

Others:
2002 Z06 - Brakes not up to the task, needed full aftermarket braking system.
2008 Corvette - Brakes not up to the task, needed full aftermarket braking system.
2011 Z06 - Brakes not up to the task, needed full aftermarket braking system.
2013 Camaro ZL1 - engine overheated
2014 Stingray - brakes not up to the task, needed full aftermarket braking system
2015 Z06 - complete disaster. Limp mode, fuel delivery issues, broken control arm, overheating
2014 GTR - transmission overheated
Old 01-01-2017, 07:41 PM
  #27  
ShakeNBake
Rennlist Member
 
ShakeNBake's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Posts: 5,638
Received 938 Likes on 543 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by electron mike
Both my GT4 and F80 M3 have been very reliable on track even in very hot weather. Just fluids, tires, pads, rotors.. rinse and repeat.

Others:
2002 Z06 - Brakes not up to the task, needed full aftermarket braking system.
2008 Corvette - Brakes not up to the task, needed full aftermarket braking system.
2011 Z06 - Brakes not up to the task, needed full aftermarket braking system.
2013 Camaro ZL1 - engine overheated
2014 Stingray - brakes not up to the task, needed full aftermarket braking system
2015 Z06 - complete disaster. Limp mode, fuel delivery issues, broken control arm, overheating
2014 GTR - transmission overheated
Ug...that truly is frustrating. Texas/COTA is also not very nice to cars. That's one nice thing about Porsches, even if the ECU pulls a lot of timing, they *usually* handle the heat pretty well.
Old 01-01-2017, 08:53 PM
  #28  
turbo8765
Instructor
 
turbo8765's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 175
Received 26 Likes on 14 Posts
Default

s2000.
Old 01-01-2017, 09:09 PM
  #29  
matttheboatman
Rennlist Member
 
matttheboatman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,523
Received 610 Likes on 235 Posts
Default

As a pleasant to drive normal sized street car, the 981 Cayman in all its variants, is beyond compare IMO. My experience owning one of each - ZERO failures of any kind.

I always contended that the GTS model was the perfect balance between the competing factors of weight / horsepower / and brakes.

Whereas, the GT4 has some extremes - the hp can develop speeds that can overdrive streetable tires, and the brakes are waaaay more capable than would otherwise been needed on a 3,000# car. The GT4's extremes do require more driver skill to manage the car, where as the base, S, and GTS you just drive.

My vote - any 981 Cayman.
Old 01-01-2017, 10:59 PM
  #30  
electron mike
Rennlist Member
 
electron mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,444
Received 618 Likes on 274 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ShakeNBake
Ug...that truly is frustrating. Texas/COTA is also not very nice to cars. That's one nice thing about Porsches, even if the ECU pulls a lot of timing, they *usually* handle the heat pretty well.
Yes! It was when I was always in the paddock fixing/cooling/diagnosing my C7 Z06 while the Porsches on track kept going all day that the light bulb finally went on, and I thought maybe I should buy a Porsche myself!


Quick Reply: Most reliable track car?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 10:12 PM.