Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

Salter Aero Wing Supports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-09-2016, 12:23 PM
  #16  
Dr.Bill
Race Car
 
Dr.Bill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 4,690
Received 719 Likes on 394 Posts
Default

How can it be a cosmetic 'upgrade' when it looks worse than stock?
Old 08-09-2016, 12:50 PM
  #17  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,399
Received 1,314 Likes on 799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Knolow
Originally Posted by ExMB
Considering that it sits higher in the airstream I would question that comment about not compromising OEM aerodynamics. Where is the data that shows this?
I can see your point but visit the site and reach out to the Salter Aero. They are very responsive and open which is why I was able to work out a group buy. I am helping forum members get this product for a great deal as people want aftermarket wing risers.

I myself track and compete and will be utilizing this in my competitions.
No flame, but here is what they say on their site which is different from your statement.

Track tested by professional drivers, these supports provide just enough added downforce in the rear to aid cornering without upsetting stock aerodynamics intended by Porsche.

I don't think that a butt dyno measurement by an unknown professional driver qualifies as verifiable data.


Originally Posted by d00d
It may actually decrease downforce.
From https://rennlist.com/forums/gt4/9432...uprights.html;


No mention of increased angle adjustment, and if there were it may look odd at that setting;
http://salteraero.com/product/gt4-wing-support/

Also, a higher wing won't be able to take advantage of air flow over the rear fenders;
Attachment 1078727

__________________
2016 white/black GT4;
https://rennlist.com/forums/gt4/9321...e-journal.html
2008 white/amaretto S8
From their site

The OEM wing angle and its adjustability is maintained.

That and the butt dyno reference from above definitely leaves a lot open to interpretation.


Originally Posted by RDCR
Originally Posted by odwa
Too many online experts just guessing here. Take a look at the Crawford Wing that is installed on many GT3's for track purpose, it has approx 6" higher location than standard GT3 and increases downforce substantially in wind tunnel testing.
I'll venture a "guess" that the aero on a rear engined GT3 just might be different then the GT4's? You did mention some key words though: "wind tunnel testing"
+1
Old 08-09-2016, 01:09 PM
  #18  
zmon
Rennlist Member
 
zmon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Keswick VA
Posts: 900
Received 140 Likes on 78 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Accel Junky
Crackpipe money. And $60 for shipping? Is that next day air with a complimentary bottle of wine?
SERIOUSLY!!!
Old 08-09-2016, 01:44 PM
  #19  
trebien
Racer
 
trebien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: TX & CA
Posts: 439
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by ExMB
I don't think that a butt dyno measurement by an unknown professional driver qualifies as verifiable data.
Exactly. It's a no-brainer that moving the wing to a different location within the airstream will affect the aerodynamics. Seems like false, unsubstantiated claims to imply or state that it is not.
Old 08-09-2016, 05:19 PM
  #20  
24Chromium
Drifting
 
24Chromium's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Black Sheep Racing World HQ
Posts: 3,278
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 13 Posts
Default

You lot crack me up. A bunch of keyboard experts.

What would it take to satisfy you? Wind tunnel data, is it? Well exactly how much is that gonna cost? Let's say it's $10k/day. You'll need a good baseline, plus testing the new parts. Then you'll want to try various tweaks. So let's say you spend two days in a wind tunnel. That's $20k. Plus you'll need to hire an expert, have your designer on-site, maybe another guy to do the wrenching. You'll need a car, of course. And wind tunnels aren't on every corner, like Starbucks, so you'll need to travel to reach it, not to mention food and lodging. Let's say all that was another $10k. Now you're in for $30k. How many do you expect to sell? I'll be generous and say 50. $30k/50 units = $600/unit sold just to recoup that money. And you haven't even factored in the actual cost of design and manufacture.

Obviously these are just guesstimates, but I'll bet I'm on the low end of real numbers. I work in design and manufacture, so I think I understand this better than most.

That's a hell of a lot of money to risk on a niche product. And don't even get me started about some of you asking for them to test with other vendors parts to balance the front end.

I'll just wrap up by saying I've already purchased a set. I'm very much looking forward to putting them on my car.
Old 08-09-2016, 07:55 PM
  #21  
Bill Lehman
Three Wheelin'
 
Bill Lehman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,934
Likes: 0
Received 228 Likes on 134 Posts
Default

"You lot crack me up. A bunch of keyboard experts. " I might qualify, designed, built, and installed a splitter on my MGB race car in the 70s and made it to the SCCA Runoffs. Did aero design on my 987.1 Cayman and have AiM data to prove it worked at Watkins Glen.
Old 08-09-2016, 09:25 PM
  #22  
RDCR
Rennlist Member
 
RDCR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Santa Cruz - Norcal
Posts: 1,979
Received 481 Likes on 303 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by 24Chromium
You lot crack me up. A bunch of keyboard experts.

What would it take to satisfy you? Wind tunnel data, is it? Well exactly how much is that gonna cost? Let's say it's $10k/day. You'll need a good baseline, plus testing the new parts. Then you'll want to try various tweaks. So let's say you spend two days in a wind tunnel. That's $20k. Plus you'll need to hire an expert, have your designer on-site, maybe another guy to do the wrenching. You'll need a car, of course. And wind tunnels aren't on every corner, like Starbucks, so you'll need to travel to reach it, not to mention food and lodging. Let's say all that was another $10k. Now you're in for $30k. How many do you expect to sell? I'll be generous and say 50. $30k/50 units = $600/unit sold just to recoup that money. And you haven't even factored in the actual cost of design and manufacture.

Obviously these are just guesstimates, but I'll bet I'm on the low end of real numbers. I work in design and manufacture, so I think I understand this better than most.

That's a hell of a lot of money to risk on a niche product. And don't even get me started about some of you asking for them to test with other vendors parts to balance the front end.

I'll just wrap up by saying I've already purchased a set. I'm very much looking forward to putting them on my car.
You're estimating a cost of $600 a unit WITH wind tunnel testing.

They're asking $2K a set with no apparent testing! I'm not sure you made your point of justifying theircost with the above analysis.

If you're impartial enough about your purchase to give an honest report as to the benefits (or lack there of) I'd be interested in hearing it.

I have a feeling there will never be wind tunnel testing and if these are beneficial (based on multiple user experience) other mfgs will copy the design and the price will end up below $500.
Old 08-09-2016, 10:00 PM
  #23  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,399
Received 1,314 Likes on 799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by RDCR
You're estimating a cost of $600 a unit WITH wind tunnel testing.

They're asking $2K a set with no apparent testing! I'm not sure you made your point of justifying theircost with the above analysis.

If you're impartial enough about your purchase to give an honest report as to the benefits (or lack there of) I'd be interested in hearing it.

I have a feeling there will never be wind tunnel testing and if these are beneficial (based on multiple user experience) other mfgs will copy the design and the price will end up below $500.
Similar and cheaper

Link

I'm also sure that there are more than enough of us with actual design experience, including testing of said designs, that it doesn't need to be used as an argument to dispel posts.
Old 08-09-2016, 10:24 PM
  #24  
d00d
Rennlist Member
 
d00d's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: 4MB, HYA
Posts: 1,670
Received 275 Likes on 180 Posts
Default

Aerodynamics aside, of all the aftermarket supports I consider these the best looking.
These supports need wider functional RS vented fenders to balance the higher wing visually.
Without those, the factory supports make the overall design with the wing placement the best in my opinion.

Last edited by d00d; 10-28-2017 at 06:55 PM.
Old 08-09-2016, 10:57 PM
  #25  
Knolow
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Knolow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 283
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

...

Last edited by Knolow; 08-10-2016 at 12:32 AM.
Old 08-09-2016, 10:59 PM
  #26  
GTautoDesign
Instructor
 
GTautoDesign's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Delaware
Posts: 207
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

...
Old 08-09-2016, 11:20 PM
  #27  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,399
Received 1,314 Likes on 799 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Knolow
Hey it's within everyone's right to question and our amendment to provide speech/input. Like you, I was intrigued and definitely appreciative of the visual appeal. Performance wise I will compete my GT4 so I am open to the idea of my oem aero dynamics components getting "upgraded".

Salter Aero is company that is open and friendly. Guys feel free to reach out to them. I brought to their attention the concern over aerodynamic impacts and their design intentions and below is the reposponse and data they provided:

"The below image is a representation of air flow based on our 3D CFD results. At top speed there is an approximate increase of 10% in down force. Air speed travel across the top of the GT4 body was also improved at 6% measured at 145 KPH.

These results were obtained by 3D scanning the entire vehicle and simulating air flow using computational fluid dynamics software"
In other words they now have debunked their own website statement

Track tested by professional drivers, these supports provide just enough added downforce in the rear to aid cornering without upsetting stock aerodynamics intended by Porsche.

by showing that their butt dynos versus their CFD analysis show that there is an effect not intended by Porsche.
Old 08-09-2016, 11:35 PM
  #28  
Knolow
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Knolow's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Posts: 283
Received 4 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

...

Last edited by Knolow; 08-10-2016 at 12:32 AM.
Old 08-09-2016, 11:53 PM
  #29  
fastauto
Instructor
 
fastauto's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 124
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Default

Nice looking piece but the cost associated with it is crazy.
Old 08-09-2016, 11:57 PM
  #30  
Scottykenneth
Rennlist Member
 
Scottykenneth's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,678
Received 374 Likes on 195 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by fastauto
Nice looking piece but the cost associated with it is crazy.
Ditto.


Quick Reply: Salter Aero Wing Supports



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:08 AM.