Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

Loser article: Future Of The Porsche 718 Boxster And Cayman Isn’t Looking Too Good

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-27-2018, 03:00 PM
  #1  
Perimeter
Rennlist Member
Thread Starter
 
Perimeter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: USA PNW + AZ
Posts: 3,714
Received 328 Likes on 219 Posts
Default Loser article: Future Of The Porsche 718 Boxster And Cayman Isn’t Looking Too Good

I don't like this fear/speculation that they will drop this model, must be trying to generate readership?
Worse yet, the comparison to BRZ/FRS ....
https://carbuzz.com/news/future-of-t...oking-too-good
Old 01-27-2018, 05:04 PM
  #2  
ExMB
Rennlist Member
 
ExMB's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 8,400
Received 1,317 Likes on 800 Posts
Default

Old 01-27-2018, 05:47 PM
  #3  
Five12Free
Rennlist Member
 
Five12Free's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,496
Received 199 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

The 718 isn’t selling... it’s not a secret.
Old 01-27-2018, 06:01 PM
  #4  
Diablo Dude
Race Car
 
Diablo Dude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,938
Received 2,087 Likes on 1,174 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Five12Free
The 718 isn’t selling... it’s not a secret.
Yup.

http://press.porsche.com/news/release.php?id=1059

5,087 Boxster/Cayman sales in 2017
Old 01-27-2018, 10:25 PM
  #5  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,878
Received 1,278 Likes on 597 Posts
Default

I rarely comment on other media, but what a fantastically erroneous statement:

"Porsche became the famed automaker it is today all thanks to the 911. It later began offering a distilled version of its performance car, the Cayman and Boxster, in order to take a larger share of the performance market."

It's hard for me to believe that something like this got published by a name-brand automotive title. Even if the author tried to wiggle by suggesting the 993-based 911 turned the tide before the 986 Boxster changed the ocean, the "all thanks to the 911" clause counters that. Not to mention, you know, the 356, 912, 914, 924, 928, 944, etc etc. Or the 550, 718, 904, 906, 910, 907, 908, 917, 936, 956, 962, GT1, etc etc. Nah, they had nothing to do with Porsche becoming a famed automaker. Nor did the Cayenne...especially in a market like China.
Old 01-27-2018, 10:43 PM
  #6  
mooty
GT3 player par excellence
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
 
mooty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: san francisco
Posts: 43,333
Received 5,482 Likes on 2,269 Posts
Default

^ LOL, as u know, anyone who can type without typo is a journlkist now days.
Old 01-27-2018, 10:52 PM
  #7  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,878
Received 1,278 Likes on 597 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mooty
^ LOL, as u know, anyone who can type without typo is a journlkist now days.
Nowadays? Brother, as you know, it's been that way for decades. This, however, is next-level BS.

With that said, the Boxster/Cayman IS in an interesting place. Given the platform share with the 991/992, I think the 982 can bump along for a while. But, as much a mid-engined guy as I am, I wouldn't cry if the Boxster/Cayman was discontinued (though I would be a bit bummed for those who are into these Porsches). Why? They handle even better than my GT4 did, but the flat four is anathema after 20 years of flat sixes in the 986/987/981…and the 718 styling is beat down imo.

Meanwhile, I am starting to wonder what a small, pure electric sports car from Porsche might be like. Keep thinking back to a drive in a 918 in E-Power mode with a friend in a Boxster Spyder chasing. It was a new world to me...feeling like re-harnessed energy redirected and it was definitely fun. You know the road, too, from when you were chasing me in a 4.1 when I was driving your 4.0. All sorts of new noises to consider in the 918, noises you just don't hear in IC sports cars. Tires, bearings, anti-roll bars, etc. Haven't decided if I like that or not, but the experience opened my mind to wonder IF I could like that experience. Reminded me of the sounds of wind in the sails paired with the sensation of those forces...and I do like those noises and feelings in a sailboat. A modern 550E, Speedster E, or 912E might also be nice for use around town, especially if it is achingly beautiful and sized right. Could also be awful. At least it would be interesting. The 718, to me, is not.

Last edited by stout; 01-28-2018 at 01:02 AM.
Old 01-27-2018, 11:03 PM
  #8  
BryanCO
Drifting
 
BryanCO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Colorado Springs
Posts: 2,941
Received 208 Likes on 148 Posts
Default

Appreciate the insight Pete.
Old 01-27-2018, 11:08 PM
  #9  
Marine Blue
Addict
Rennlist Member
 
Marine Blue's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Temecula, CA
Posts: 16,022
Received 801 Likes on 465 Posts
Default

The 718 was specifically made for the Chinese market and it shouldn’t come as a surprise that it’s not doing well in the US. The Boxster and Cayman used to be the affordable Porsche that was accessible to a larger buyer pool but that no longer applies. The remaining buyer pool are the enthusiasts which covet the, sound, feedback and overall driving experience and that’s the issue. The 718 doesn’t really appeal to either of the primary buyers anymore so sales have stagnated. I’m really curious if the 718 is doing well in China, if not it was a major marketing mis step by Porsche.
Old 01-28-2018, 01:05 AM
  #10  
stout
Rennlist Member
 
stout's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: ^ The Bay Bridge
Posts: 4,878
Received 1,278 Likes on 597 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Marine Blue
The 718 was specifically made for the Chinese market and it shouldn’t come as a surprise that it’s not doing well in the US. The Boxster and Cayman used to be the affordable Porsche that was accessible to a larger buyer pool but that no longer applies. The remaining buyer pool are the enthusiasts which covet the, sound, feedback and overall driving experience and that’s the issue. The 718 doesn’t really appeal to either of the primary buyers anymore so sales have stagnated. I’m really curious if the 718 is doing well in China, if not it was a major marketing mis step by Porsche.
^ Good points, and reminded me of one other major challenge for the 718: Pricing for a four-cylinder car. May or may not be an issue in other markets, but one can easily option a 718 up to $75-90k, and that's a lot of coin for something with four cylinders...
Old 01-28-2018, 02:55 AM
  #11  
Five12Free
Rennlist Member
 
Five12Free's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Tucson, AZ
Posts: 1,496
Received 199 Likes on 120 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stout
^ Good points, and reminded me of one other major challenge for the 718: Pricing for a four-cylinder car. May or may not be an issue in other markets, but one can easily option a 718 up to $75-90k, and that's a lot of coin for something with four cylinders...
I think world market expansion was in the mind of Porsche for sure. Some of these countries have some outrageous taxes on cars with larger engines. If they can’t sell these in the US, they did the next best thing. FWIW, if Porsche execs weren’t analyzing and assessing the future of what’s next, they aren’t doing their jobs. They should always be asking ‘can we do better?’

Another source saying the same thing. I’m sure based on speculation derived from the release of the 2017 sales presss release.
http://www.automobilemag.com/news/91...718s-not-much/

Old 01-28-2018, 03:46 AM
  #12  
Semitone
Pro
 
Semitone's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Posts: 520
Received 121 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Regardless of the US sales, global sales for the 718 seem to be up 6% y/y, IIRC. 25,000 units compared to 32,000 for the 911. Doesn't sound like it's time for a requiem yet.

The article seems to be trolling.

(Edit: Sadly it looks like the author of the Carbuzz article read another speculative article from Automobile Magazine and then just created a new piece without doing any additional research. Lazy ****)

Last edited by Semitone; 01-28-2018 at 04:01 AM.
Old 01-28-2018, 05:33 AM
  #13  
GregWormald
Racer
 
GregWormald's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: South Australia
Posts: 390
Received 48 Likes on 38 Posts
Default

Oh pu-leeezze. You don't expect online journos to actually research their articles do you?
They just quote what they're fed. It's why the acceleration times/speeds are all identical to the Porsche handouts except for one or two of the prestige mags that actually did the tests.
Most of the online stuff counts as entertainment, not reportage.
Old 01-28-2018, 09:21 AM
  #14  
Keadog
Rennlist Member
 
Keadog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 6,799
Received 1,019 Likes on 612 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by stout
^ Good points, and reminded me of one other major challenge for the 718: Pricing for a four-cylinder car. May or may not be an issue in other markets, but one can easily option a 718 up to $75-90k, and that's a lot of coin for something with four cylinders...
For me, this. After a ‘13 Boxster S and a ‘16 Boxster GTS (both of which I ordered well optioned at under $90K MSRP), I for one simply won’t pay that kind of money for a 4 cylinder car, especially when I know it was only done to “fit” a market that is not my own.

I don’t recall them even trying the “back to basics” approach as an homage to their roots in the 356. Not that it would have mattered to me.

I am on “the list” for a 718 Spyder, but only if the (good) engine rumors are true. I told my GM not to bother calling if it’s a Turbo 4.
Old 01-28-2018, 10:50 AM
  #15  
okie981
Rennlist Member
 
okie981's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: On a pygmy pony over by the dental floss bush
Posts: 3,286
Received 606 Likes on 415 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Semitone
(Edit: Sadly it looks like the author of the Carbuzz article read another speculative article from Automobile Magazine and then just created a new piece without doing any additional research. Lazy ****)
Exactly my thought. I read the Automobile piece first yesterday, and reading the Buzzkill version immediately struck me as a ripoff with bad imagination added. Echoing Stout's thoughts, the 718 is anathema to me as well. Seems like I read the real-world fuel economy of the 981 Boxster 3.4L is better than the 718 BS Turbo, with same transmissions. I got 31.4 average MPG over 5,800 miles of driving from DFW to Jay Peak VT (2016 Parade) and back in my 981 BS with PDK, and good fuel economy was not my goal at any point of that drive. I've wondered if the 911 RSR being mid-engine design could lead eventually to a production mid-engine 911 sized platform that would make the Cayman/Boxster redundant. Heresy to both 911 and Cayman/Boxster fans, I know.


Quick Reply: Loser article: Future Of The Porsche 718 Boxster And Cayman Isn’t Looking Too Good



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 03:09 PM.