Notices
GT4/Spyder Discussions about the 981 GT4/Spyder
Sponsored by:
Sponsored by: APR

More power for the GT4 - any valid numbers?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-24-2017, 09:22 PM
  #31  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,717
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT4_Driver
Well, to be honest: one of the most reputed German Porsche tuning shops told me that they have serious doubts about the alleged power gains by installing the IPD, TB etc. because none of the cars they had on their dyno achieved the alleged power. Therefore, I just wanted to know if anybody measured the acceleration of his GT4 after the tuning. It is kind of funny that, apparently, nobody does that. As I mentioned the a-Workx that was tested in SportAuto had allegedly 420hp, however, the acceleration measured by SportAuto was on the same level like the series GT4.
Dyno data isn't always everything. The change in the drivability, throttle response, and overall feel of the powercurve is very nicely enhance by the plenum/tb package. All the feedback i've gotten from my clients are around the same lines...smoother powercurve that pulls more evenly and harder throughout the curve.

Extended Warranty just posted some nice insight on the plenum/tb upgrade here saying " Loaded up the Cobb Stage 2 OTS map last week, very nice bump in power.

Today I got the IPD Plenum/82mm GT3 TB installed. See it as my big '**** you' to Porsche for putting a 74mm TB on the GT4 when the 991.1S came with the 82mm TB stock. Impressions: The Cobb Stage 2 OTS tune integrated flawlessly to the IPD Plenum/82mm TB, no codes, no stumble, no knock The stock exhaust sounds 20% louder and there is a very nice bump in power in the mid-range and a smaller bump up too. There is an increased in air induction sound and the throttle response is more lively. The car pulls smoothly to no end without any dips in the midrange anymore (the Fabspeed headers themselves smoothed out 95% of it). Highly recommended modification to complete your bolt ons Don't just settle for that 74mm TB that Porsche purposely gimped the car with."

Originally Posted by cox1974
Just finished to make datalogs for Fabspeed... Tonight i'll send them via email and wait for the custom ecu map.... I think that for the end of january/beginning of febrary ...i will dyno again my gt4 to see if my buttdyno works correctly... Fingers crossed...and stay tuned for the next dynosheet....
​​​​​​
Looking forward to hearing how everything goes with the new upgrades!

Originally Posted by Bardman
I too struggle with the lack of data that is put out there by those selling performance products. What I will say, however, is that 1/4 mile runs introduce so many variables that it makes valid comparisons difficult. A dyno done right will pretty accurately tell you what has changed with regards HP/torque, but 1/4 mile adds in additional variables like tyres (hot or cold), surface grip, how good was the launch, gear changes, wind speed etc. (I'm assuming temperature/humidity etc variances are equally bad between the two).
Very well said! To add to this point, most clients aren't going to give shops permission to take their car to the nearest drag strip to whoop on their car. We don't even bother asking as we don't want that responsibility on our head.

Originally Posted by mrd_spy
no one cares about dyno sheets anymore, we have all seem them time and time again

even fabspeed are out there quoting peak BHP at stupid revs one will never see !

there manifold gave less bhp where you wanted it !
May I ask you to elaborate a bit on this? I am quite familiar with all our dyno graphs, and to start I don't quite understand the "peak BHP at stupid revs one will never see". Peak BHP on these cars are seen at right around 6500rpm, and this doesn't change more than a few hundred rpm between different cars, upgrades, and dynos.
__________________
Porsche Performance Specialist
John@Fabspeed.com
215-618-9796

Fabspeed Motorsport USA
155 Commerce Drive Fort Washington, PA 19034
www.Fabspeed.com


Old 01-25-2017, 04:47 PM
  #32  
GT4_Driver
Advanced
Thread Starter
 
GT4_Driver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Munich
Posts: 52
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Default

Well John, you wrote a lot, but still no numbers. Why is it such a huge problem to measure the car with a PB?
Old 01-25-2017, 04:59 PM
  #33  
mrd_spy
Burning Brakes
 
mrd_spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 785
Received 202 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Fabspeed Motorsport


May I ask you to elaborate a bit on this? I am quite familiar with all our dyno graphs, and to start I don't quite understand the "peak BHP at stupid revs one will never see". Peak BHP on these cars are seen at right around 6500rpm, and this doesn't change more than a few hundred rpm between different cars, upgrades, and dynos.

to quote your manifolds

"Fabspeed's Sport Headers for the Porsche Cayman GT4 add 26 whp and 39 ft-lbs of torque at 3600RPM"

when infact at 4k revs fitting the manifolds would give lower than stock numbers !

and gains at 6.5k are 10bhp so just about worthless.

hence why in the real world people are not doing timed runs as the cars no quicker WOT !

who give a flying what a peak figure quoted at 3.6k revs is, I never see 3.6k revs !

remember these are fabspeed words not mine in the quote above
Old 01-25-2017, 05:06 PM
  #34  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,717
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by GT4_Driver
Well John, you wrote a lot, but still no numbers. Why is it such a huge problem to measure the car with a PB?
Well I wouldn't really say its a big problem at all. Up until the last few days there was little to no request for such data to warrant the time and material to invest in a PB, along with the additional invested time in performing that testing on top of all the other R&D work and dyno testing we do on our products. In over two years I have only had one other person (a 991TT owner) ask for that kind of data.
Old 01-25-2017, 05:30 PM
  #35  
John@Fabspeed
Basic Sponsor
Rennlist
Site Sponsor

 
John@Fabspeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Fort Washington, Pa
Posts: 4,717
Received 56 Likes on 40 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by mrd_spy
to quote your manifolds

"Fabspeed's Sport Headers for the Porsche Cayman GT4 add 26 whp and 39 ft-lbs of torque at 3600RPM"

when infact at 4k revs fitting the manifolds would give lower than stock numbers !

and gains at 6.5k are 10bhp so just about worthless.

hence why in the real world people are not doing timed runs as the cars no quicker WOT !

who give a flying what a peak figure quoted at 3.6k revs is, I never see 3.6k revs !

remember these are fabspeed words not mine in the quote above
I take it you must not have seen the dyno graph by a third party PCS Motorsport, which is also on the Sport Header product page for your reference. If you are looking for maximum gains in the higher RPMs, you should looking at Race Headers and ditching your factory cats.

After countless inquiries and complaints of the factory powercurve having a performance dip in the 3200-3800RPM range and long gearing, our Sport Headers were developed to target that low end power dip. That is where the gains are needed to optimize the performance for majority street use, with a much stronger and smoother low-end/mid-range the get the car powering through the powerdip and the long gearing.

Again, if you never see 3-4k rpms then you should be investing in a set of Race Headers for your car. Different needs fit different products, just because yours don't match our Sport Headers doesn't mean the Sport Headers don't exceed the expectations of all our clients running them.
Old 01-25-2017, 08:18 PM
  #36  
turbo8765
Instructor
 
turbo8765's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 180
Received 29 Likes on 16 Posts
Default

In the end, a quarter mile track is the best way to confirm power gains. It's a known verifiable location.... and there's always a large database of info to compare to.

Trap speed is a reliable indicator of power, and it's easy to correct for DA.
Old 01-25-2017, 10:06 PM
  #37  
jmartpr
Rennlist Member
 
jmartpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,756
Received 1,478 Likes on 919 Posts
Default

The more info we have available the better but I do agree with John on the application of sport vs race headers and what they really provide in the real world. Also, 1/4 mile times can give you some idea but I think too many variables come into play and very difficult to control them. Would love to see owners dumping clutches at 4-5K rpms on the drag strip....unless you do a roll. Again too many things that can change from pass to pass.
Old 01-25-2017, 11:17 PM
  #38  
user1029
Drifting
 
user1029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,178
Received 562 Likes on 276 Posts
Default

In contrast to modifying turbo'ed cars, debating about modification gains on a naturally aspirated platform is like fighting over meager table scraps.

'oh but that mod gained 10hp but is it really 10hp or it is just random dyno variation?!?!?!?!?'

Look at the overall gains underneath the curve and improvements to driveability if you want to scrutinize anything - headers are definitely a good bang for the buck mod for this platform
Old 01-26-2017, 02:23 AM
  #39  
Peter_GT4
Advanced
 
Peter_GT4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Posts: 98
Received 94 Likes on 18 Posts
Default

GT4, cargraphic sport headers, IPD, tune, 100-200 km/h between 9.1 and 9.5 seconds.

Performance box was borrowed from a fellow GT4 owner, his stock GT4 (same weight)
took 10.1 to 10.5 seconds. I assume that a 0.5 to 1 second improvement is to be expected
and realistic in relation to the claimed figures.

More important...it does feel right and defintely different, as often described here.


Peter
The following users liked this post:
Martin Anders (09-26-2020)
Old 01-26-2017, 02:34 AM
  #40  
cox1974
Rennlist Member
 
cox1974's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Puglia
Posts: 803
Received 122 Likes on 65 Posts
Default

Custom map uploaded.... Next Wednesday i will dyno my gt4 for the third time on the same dyno ...and will post the graph....
Old 01-26-2017, 03:52 AM
  #41  
Alan C.
Rennlist Member
 
Alan C.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2001
Location: Ohio
Posts: 9,472
Received 1,060 Likes on 546 Posts
Default

Thanks for your willingness to share your data and time.
Old 01-26-2017, 01:03 PM
  #42  
jmartpr
Rennlist Member
 
jmartpr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 4,756
Received 1,478 Likes on 919 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by Peter_GT4
GT4, cargraphic sport headers, IPD, tune, 100-200 km/h between 9.1 and 9.5 seconds.

Performance box was borrowed from a fellow GT4 owner, his stock GT4 (same weight)
took 10.1 to 10.5 seconds. I assume that a 0.5 to 1 second improvement is to be expected
and realistic in relation to the claimed figures.

More important...it does feel right and defintely different, as often described here.


Peter

Thanks for posting this info...first time I see something like this posted. Also, your test start at 100 km/h (60 mph) all the way to 200.....which is a good indication that indeed there's a good performance gain that shows on a very useful speed range.
The following users liked this post:
Martin Anders (09-26-2020)
Old 01-26-2017, 02:27 PM
  #43  
Yargk
Rennlist Member
 
Yargk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: SF Bay Area, CA
Posts: 2,228
Received 232 Likes on 151 Posts
Default

Originally Posted by cox1974
Custom map uploaded.... Next Wednesday i will dyno my gt4 for the third time on the same dyno ...and will post the graph....
The following users liked this post:
Martin Anders (09-26-2020)
Old 01-26-2017, 04:05 PM
  #44  
mrd_spy
Burning Brakes
 
mrd_spy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 785
Received 202 Likes on 131 Posts
Default

nice gain in time that.

which tune was on that car ?

My Audi TTRS with a remap was 7.8 seconds 100-200 kmh.
So it makes you think , one does not buy GT cars for the outright performance.
Old 01-26-2017, 04:21 PM
  #45  
user1029
Drifting
 
user1029's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 3,178
Received 562 Likes on 276 Posts
Default

One buys a GT car to not be mistaken for a hairdresser


Quick Reply: More power for the GT4 - any valid numbers?



All times are GMT -3. The time now is 05:20 AM.