Adding Tire temp to AIM system
#1
Adding Tire temp to AIM system
I'd like to add the AIM infrared tire temperature sensors to my data set up.
I just had a Smartycam system with the cup ECU bridge and GPS antenna installed. After a little research on the AIM site, it looks like in addition to the four sensors, some custom fabbed sensor brackets and various lengths of extension cables, I need an EVO4S data logger to "read" the sensor data and transmit it on.
Does the data logger replace the ECU bridge and GPS antenna? Is there an alternative to this combination?
Thanks for any help.
I just had a Smartycam system with the cup ECU bridge and GPS antenna installed. After a little research on the AIM site, it looks like in addition to the four sensors, some custom fabbed sensor brackets and various lengths of extension cables, I need an EVO4S data logger to "read" the sensor data and transmit it on.
Does the data logger replace the ECU bridge and GPS antenna? Is there an alternative to this combination?
Thanks for any help.
#2
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,833 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
Yes, the logger replaces the ECU Bridge and antenna.
The infrared tire sensors that AiM sells are individual, analog (one per channel) sensors that work well and are $100/ea. You could buy six, a channel expansion and an EVO4S and get three temps across each front tire, pretty reasonably.
Of course, the sky is the limit with 16 channel (per corner), basically four IZZE CAN based units (which would require their own harness) fed to the CAN input on the logger. About $1800 for that setup, plus you'd need an AiM logger with two CAN networks (EVO5 or dash display logger with two AutoSport connectors).
Glad to help. I often test just four corners to tune the balance of the car better. KISS...
The infrared tire sensors that AiM sells are individual, analog (one per channel) sensors that work well and are $100/ea. You could buy six, a channel expansion and an EVO4S and get three temps across each front tire, pretty reasonably.
Of course, the sky is the limit with 16 channel (per corner), basically four IZZE CAN based units (which would require their own harness) fed to the CAN input on the logger. About $1800 for that setup, plus you'd need an AiM logger with two CAN networks (EVO5 or dash display logger with two AutoSport connectors).
Glad to help. I often test just four corners to tune the balance of the car better. KISS...
__________________
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
-Peter Krause
www.peterkrause.net
www.gofasternow.com
"Combining the Art and Science of Driving Fast!"
Specializing in Professional, Private Driver Performance Evaluation and Optimization
Consultation Available Remotely and at VIRginia International Raceway
#3
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
What logger do you have in the car now? Are you using the data from it? If so, no sense adding a logger just for tire temps that is separate from the other data.
I'll have a user configurable, 16 channel, multi field of view sensor available in the next month or so. It's a great more configurable alternative to the Izzy sensors.
If you add a logger for just CAN tire temps, uink about just using an S2DL.
I'll have a user configurable, 16 channel, multi field of view sensor available in the next month or so. It's a great more configurable alternative to the Izzy sensors.
If you add a logger for just CAN tire temps, uink about just using an S2DL.
#4
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,833 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
Good point, but if you used the S2DL, you would need the CAN based (not the AiM supplied analog) tire temp sensors from IZZE, Texense or the ones Matt says are coming.
You wouldn't (I don't think) be able to get BOTH the MS3 Bosch ECU data (which is what you get now on your ECU Bridge that feeds the camera) AND the CAN based tire temp information, onto the Solo 2 DL. You could feed the camera from the Solo 2 DL.
For cost and simplicity, still think it's best to replace the ECU Bridge and antenna with the most inexpensive, expandable logger (EVO4S) that will not only connect to your car's ECU, but also accept the inexpensive AiM analog tire temp sensors and feed the camera.
You wouldn't (I don't think) be able to get BOTH the MS3 Bosch ECU data (which is what you get now on your ECU Bridge that feeds the camera) AND the CAN based tire temp information, onto the Solo 2 DL. You could feed the camera from the Solo 2 DL.
For cost and simplicity, still think it's best to replace the ECU Bridge and antenna with the most inexpensive, expandable logger (EVO4S) that will not only connect to your car's ECU, but also accept the inexpensive AiM analog tire temp sensors and feed the camera.
#5
I’m not sure about the details, but I’m assuming the current “logger” is the MoTeC. In addition to the info provided through the ECU, the car has brake pressure and steering angle sensors and the Smartycam GPS antenna should provide track position. Adding tire temperature info has been mentioned to help with car set up and as a driver improvement tool.
#6
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,833 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
Yes, 997 GT3 Cup should have MoTeC ADL2. You could use the AiM sensors referenced in your original post or better yet, you could collect IR temps through the MoTeC CAN. That's the best way to do it. Don't even bother with swapping out the Bridge connected to the camera.
#7
Nordschleife Master
You also need to know if the harness for the current logger was built to be expanded. It’s incredibly time consuming (aka expensive) to rebuild the harness.
Trending Topics
#8
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,833 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
For instance, most systems in Cup cars have BR2 Beacon receivers on both sides of the car. Many of those systems have been upgraded to GPS, rendering the BR2 receiver superfluous.
You can connect a CAN accessory easily to that Autosport connector and, without anything other than config changes to the dash, add another (or two) CAN accessories.
I've always seen extra CAN pigtails on most professionally built harnesses, and when I haven't, I've gone to the back of the ADL2/3 or the L120 to add one.
#9
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
You generally don't need to rebuild the harness.
For instance, most systems in Cup cars have BR2 Beacon receivers on both sides of the car. Many of those systems have been upgraded to GPS, rendering the BR2 receiver superfluous.
You can connect a CAN accessory easily to that Autosport connector and, without anything other than config changes to the dash, add another (or two) CAN accessories.
I've always seen extra CAN pigtails on most professionally built harnesses, and when I haven't, I've gone to the back of the ADL2/3 or the L120 to add one.
For instance, most systems in Cup cars have BR2 Beacon receivers on both sides of the car. Many of those systems have been upgraded to GPS, rendering the BR2 receiver superfluous.
You can connect a CAN accessory easily to that Autosport connector and, without anything other than config changes to the dash, add another (or two) CAN accessories.
I've always seen extra CAN pigtails on most professionally built harnesses, and when I haven't, I've gone to the back of the ADL2/3 or the L120 to add one.
#10
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,833 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
#11
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
#12
After more research and some trusted advice, I think I'll go with the IZZE system. The IZZE sensors are multi channel with a single sensor capable of reading up to 16 individual "zones" across the surface of the tire:
http://www.izzeracing.com/products/i...e-sensors.html
The sensors can be had in a 120 degree spread which is ideal for the wider tires on a cup. With the 120 degree sensor, it can be placed just 70 mm from a 275 front and 80mm from a 315 rear tire. I'm thinking at the bottom center of the front inner well liner and I'll have to figure out the back since the wheel house is too far from the tire. I do have a pair of CF tub liners that can be installed and the sensor can be attached to the leading edge of that. Those detail will have to be worked out.
As far as a real time display, I haven't given that any thought. I guess a numerical value of average temp across the two front tires can be shown as one of the bottom displays on the MoTeC dash when left in warm up or practice mode. That call will have to be made by someone with a much better understanding of what is and isn't possible.
As you can tell, this is totally a work in progress.
#13
Rennlist
Basic Site Sponsor
Basic Site Sponsor
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Durham, NC and Virginia International Raceway
Posts: 18,677
Received 2,833 Likes
on
1,670 Posts
That’ll work.
On the LMP-C cars, we had alarms on the dash (and you could do it on an SLM) to indicate both brake temps and tire temps below and above a trigger temp.
On the LMP-C cars, we had alarms on the dash (and you could do it on an SLM) to indicate both brake temps and tire temps below and above a trigger temp.
#14
Addict
Rennlist Member
Rennlist Member
I believe you are talking about a single point infrared sensors.
After more research and some trusted advice, I think I'll go with the IZZE system. The IZZE sensors are multi channel with a single sensor capable of reading up to 16 individual "zones" across the surface of the tire:
http://www.izzeracing.com/products/i...e-sensors.html
The sensors can be had in a 120 degree spread which is ideal for the wider tires on a cup. With the 120 degree sensor, it can be placed just 70 mm from a 275 front and 80mm from a 315 rear tire. I'm thinking at the bottom center of the front inner well liner and I'll have to figure out the back since the wheel house is too far from the tire. I do have a pair of CF tub liners that can be installed and the sensor can be attached to the leading edge of that. Those detail will have to be worked out.
As far as a real time display, I haven't given that any thought. I guess a numerical value of average temp across the two front tires can be shown as one of the bottom displays on the MoTeC dash when left in warm up or practice mode. That call will have to be made by someone with a much better understanding of what is and isn't possible.
As you can tell, this is totally a work in progress.
After more research and some trusted advice, I think I'll go with the IZZE system. The IZZE sensors are multi channel with a single sensor capable of reading up to 16 individual "zones" across the surface of the tire:
http://www.izzeracing.com/products/i...e-sensors.html
The sensors can be had in a 120 degree spread which is ideal for the wider tires on a cup. With the 120 degree sensor, it can be placed just 70 mm from a 275 front and 80mm from a 315 rear tire. I'm thinking at the bottom center of the front inner well liner and I'll have to figure out the back since the wheel house is too far from the tire. I do have a pair of CF tub liners that can be installed and the sensor can be attached to the leading edge of that. Those detail will have to be worked out.
As far as a real time display, I haven't given that any thought. I guess a numerical value of average temp across the two front tires can be shown as one of the bottom displays on the MoTeC dash when left in warm up or practice mode. That call will have to be made by someone with a much better understanding of what is and isn't possible.
As you can tell, this is totally a work in progress.
#15
Rennlist Hoonigan
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
which cost no drachmas
Lifetime Rennlist
Member
Rennlist
Site Sponsor
I've found displaying tire temps or pressures can be a bit of a mixed bag. I've seen some drivers need that verification to have the confidence that the car will handle the inputs they want to deliver and it improves their performance. I've also seen other drivers hold back temporarily or worse, for significant portions of a session, because they thought the car would not perform. In other "blind" tests, I've found that most drivers do not have an accurate sense of when the tires come up to temp and pressure. In my experience, they have the "feel" the tires are ready to go before they actually do. Many do their best laps at that point.
Point being - I think Ross Bentley's idea of "Fast Fast" and being able to get up to speed as soon as possible is the right one. Drive the car to what it can take, not what you think. Use the data for engineering, setup, and evaluation after the fact, but don't let it limit your performance.
Point being - I think Ross Bentley's idea of "Fast Fast" and being able to get up to speed as soon as possible is the right one. Drive the car to what it can take, not what you think. Use the data for engineering, setup, and evaluation after the fact, but don't let it limit your performance.